Gransnet forums

News & politics

Is it OK to break the law if you are a Tory?

(338 Posts)
CvD66 Mon 16-Jan-23 13:12:20

In 1987 Lester Pigott was imprisoned for tax evasion of £3m. Nadhim Zahawi (former chancellor) is having to pay back £3m used a tax evasion process incorrectly. He lied about this process and instructed lawyers to threaten a tax lawyer, who exposed him. Zahawi should resign and then face criminal charges both for the tax evasion and threats. But he’s a Tory….and the BBC aren’t even covering his crime.

ronib Tue 24-Jan-23 10:35:09

Whitewavemark2

Oh then I bow to what is clearly a greater authority, and have clearly been wasting my time since university.

I wasted my time at university. Most people do.

ronib Tue 24-Jan-23 10:34:09

volver

Did he?

Well that's new.

Evidence?

(Why do I bother asking?)

Google search there are quite a few references
herald Scotland.com
26 September Dominic Ryan
Boldest of budgets
Etc etc

Hope Jenners has not burnt to the ground.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 24-Jan-23 10:22:32

Oh then I bow to what is clearly a greater authority, and have clearly been wasting my time since university.

growstuff Tue 24-Jan-23 10:18:45

Whitewavemark2

growstuff

Whitewavemark2

growstuff

No market is 100% free. For example, the UK has laws which place restraints on monopolies.

Yes but they operate in a free market capitalist economy, not an economy that is run by the state.

There is a difference.

Have you read the link I posted?

It's a continuum. The state intervenes all the time in the UK economy.

Yes of course it does. But there is a distinct difference between how the state operates in China and the U.K.

In order to describe this difference an economist would use the terms I have described.

Yes economies around the world are on a continuum from traditional hunting/gathering to entirely free market economics, but it is useful to use various terms to describe where economies are on this continuum.

I don't think any serious economist would describe any economy in such black and white terms. They might describe elements within an economy as "capitalist" or "socialist", but every economy is unique in the way it combines the elements.

volver Tue 24-Jan-23 10:07:59

Did he?

Well that's new.

Evidence?

(Why do I bother asking?)

Caleo Tue 24-Jan-23 10:05:42

I believe most policemen are politically right wing.

ronib Tue 24-Jan-23 10:04:12

volver

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Hunter

I quite admire this chap, and his approach to life and business.

Never felt the need for deference towards him though. I don't suppose he'd expect it.

Tom Hunter supported the economic policies of Truss and Kwasi. Shame Hunter could not persuade the Bank of England.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 24-Jan-23 09:51:36

growstuff

Whitewavemark2

growstuff

No market is 100% free. For example, the UK has laws which place restraints on monopolies.

Yes but they operate in a free market capitalist economy, not an economy that is run by the state.

There is a difference.

Have you read the link I posted?

It's a continuum. The state intervenes all the time in the UK economy.

Yes of course it does. But there is a distinct difference between how the state operates in China and the U.K.

In order to describe this difference an economist would use the terms I have described.

Yes economies around the world are on a continuum from traditional hunting/gathering to entirely free market economics, but it is useful to use various terms to describe where economies are on this continuum.

ronib Tue 24-Jan-23 09:49:47

Growstuff my sister in law lived in Peru for many years and she thought it was socialist. The people there are very poor and have little in the way of possessions.

growstuff Tue 24-Jan-23 09:44:48

There are elements of socialism and capitalism in all modern economies, including North Korea.

growstuff Tue 24-Jan-23 09:43:29

Whitewavemark2

growstuff

No market is 100% free. For example, the UK has laws which place restraints on monopolies.

Yes but they operate in a free market capitalist economy, not an economy that is run by the state.

There is a difference.

Have you read the link I posted?

It's a continuum. The state intervenes all the time in the UK economy.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 24-Jan-23 09:42:14

I originally commented on the description of a mixed economy as a socialist economy. It isn’t it is a capitalist mixed economy.

Those industries that are owned by the state are recognised as unique and necessary for the good of the citizens and the economy. So utilities like water, fuel etc. education and health, defence and law and order are all run by the state, but everything else is privately owned and largely run as a free market, although different governments will have different policies as various points in a states life.

growstuff Tue 24-Jan-23 09:42:11

ronib

Growstuff is Peru socialist?

Not as far as I know.

uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/0-500-7812?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true

Whitewavemark2 Tue 24-Jan-23 09:34:25

growstuff

No market is 100% free. For example, the UK has laws which place restraints on monopolies.

Yes but they operate in a free market capitalist economy, not an economy that is run by the state.

There is a difference.

growstuff Tue 24-Jan-23 09:27:30

www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mixed-economic-system.asp#:~:text=Technically%2C%20almost%20every%20country%20can,limited%20number%20of%20private%20markets.

growstuff Tue 24-Jan-23 09:24:47

No market is 100% free. For example, the UK has laws which place restraints on monopolies.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 24-Jan-23 09:22:03

growstuff

Katie59

ronib

Fleurpepper I thought socialism had the oligarchs paradoxically

Socialist systems almost all exist for the benefit of the elite, China and Russia are no better examples.

Apart from North Korea, please give an example of a wholly socialist country. China and Russia have mixed economies.

How they differ from a capitalist mixed economy is that the state administers the market. It is not free. So it is not strictly speaking a capitalist economy. There are some businesses that are privately owned, but the majority of businesses are run by the state.

A socialist market economy.

volver Tue 24-Jan-23 09:20:20

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Hunter

I quite admire this chap, and his approach to life and business.

Never felt the need for deference towards him though. I don't suppose he'd expect it.

ronib Tue 24-Jan-23 09:20:15

Growstuff is Peru socialist?

ronib Tue 24-Jan-23 09:17:07

At the moment I don’t admire anyone…. Don’t do deference much.

growstuff Tue 24-Jan-23 09:16:23

Katie59

ronib

Fleurpepper I thought socialism had the oligarchs paradoxically

Socialist systems almost all exist for the benefit of the elite, China and Russia are no better examples.

Apart from North Korea, please give an example of a wholly socialist country. China and Russia have mixed economies.

Katie59 Tue 24-Jan-23 09:15:15

ronib

Fleurpepper I thought socialism had the oligarchs paradoxically

Socialist systems almost all exist for the benefit of the elite, China and Russia are no better examples.

Katie59 Tue 24-Jan-23 09:13:07

Fleurpepper

And there is the problem ronib. All this nonsense about people who criticise Zawahi and others in the same league being jealous of their wealth. NO, I will admire anyone who builds a great business- if they employees have decent conditions and fair pay, and IF THEIR PAY THEIR TAXES.

I admire those that build useful businesses honestly, that does not include Zahawi and a lot of other Tories.

ronib Tue 24-Jan-23 09:12:18

Fleurpepper

Where on earth did I say that !?!

You mean you don’t want to revise the tax system?

Whitewavemark2 Tue 24-Jan-23 09:11:55

Nobody is suggesting a socialist economy are they?

I think that the majority if asked would opt for the type of mixed capitalist economy, that ensures good public services, and utilities that are run for the good of the system and economy.