You sound very confused, Amalegra. And not at all moderate, I'm afraid.
This has been explained time and time again on this forum. The people wo have arrived via the small boats are not 'illegal', and unless you are a Home Office employee tasked with processing their asylum applications and know for a fact that every single one of them is here under false pretences, then calling them 'illegal' is wrong and deliberately inflammatory.
It has also been pointed out that:
a) Johnson refused to take up the French offer of a facility to process their asylum applications in France, which would have meant that any bogus claimants could be returned to their country of origin and the bona fide claimants could come to the UK by safe routes and be entitled to look for work when they got here
b) The Home Office has suffered so much from the tories cutting their budgets over the past decade that it is understaffed and unable to deal with all asylum applications in a timely manner. The £millions you complain of being spent on hotels would be better spent in recruiting and training more staff to get the claimants through the system faster.
85% plus of asylum applications are approved, which rather shows that your insistence that they are all 'illegal' is badly mistaken.
Lack of vital infrastructure, GPs, hospitals, schools etc. is the result of tory 'austerity' over the past 13 years, it is not the fault of the refugees.
Bereavement wipes out everything
What colour car do you have or did you used to drive?
Voting. I’m so glad we still have the ‘old fashioned’ system…


