Glorianny
DaisyAnne
Glorianny
I'd be much happier if Starmer just made two pledges.
1. No more privatisation of the NHS
2. Non-profit making cooperative companies to run energy and water provision providing reasonably priced products with any profits ploughed back into development.
He won't!
I thought his new image was funny. I could hear his advisors "Leave the jacket off, roll up your sleeves. Try to look like a working man."
I do find that sort of comment odd. Why would the parties only have campaigns that attract one person? Why would they even, should others agree with you, try to attract just a handful of people?
They are bound to have a broader appeal than that or they would have no hope of winning an election and running a democratic country for the majority.
The idea that I'm alone in wanting these things is ludicrous. 66% of people want public ownership of energy companies
weownit.org.uk/public-ownership/energy#:~:text=66%25%20of%20us%20believe%20energy,%2C%20transmission%2C%20distribution%20and%20supply.
And 84% of people think the NHS should remain a publicly funded service
www.nhsforsale.info/public-opinion-on-the-nhs-and-privatisation/
The pity is that Starmer never really manages to read the public properly. Possibly because he is so busy trying to do what he imagines people want.
I like Aneurin Bevan
^We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over!^
Your reference goes to "We Own It". It shows none of the original statistics from this single poll last August. Nor does it seem to have a link to them. So we only have their opinion on what the stats say. What is a group called "We Own it" trying to sell us, I wonder?
So the poll was conducted in August 2022. That was time, when we looked forward to what would happen in the winter and to our heating bills. August 2022, when most people had absorbed the knowledge that this government had provided very little energy security. August, when we heard about the windfall profits. August, when most found that the government was unwilling to control prices. And one poll offers one alternative and asks people if they would rather have that.
And then you spout nonsense about Starmer, a man who has dragged his party from the unpopular to the popular in a way that no one thought could be done. How has he done that without being able to "read the public properly"? Your comment is not just biased. It is from someone wearing a blindfold of prejudice.
I would happily agree that he doesn't dance to your extreme left-wing views. For many voters, that makes his leadership so much more attractive. I don't doubt that energy ownership will be under discussion if the Labour Party get into government. It will affect my view about who to vote for if it includes such things as mutuality and co-operative and community movements. I accept that you still believe in the state running the country in that nearly communist way they did after the war. You need to accept that other don't and that, in a democratic country, we may all vote from our own point of view. Hopefully, the ideas will come from Starmer and his teams and those in the smaller parties, not those still living in 1945.
If those in the middle of politics get destroyed, it's not because they are stupidly standing still and never thinking or changing their position as their perspective of danger changes. They are the very ones who watch the careering juggernaut of extremism deliberately destroy half the population. The destruction is always, absolutely always, carried out by those on the extremes who, it seems, are unable to see an altered perspective when time is constantly changing the view.