Gransnet forums

News & politics

King Charles’ Coronation: Yay, Nay or Meh? 👑

(396 Posts)
FannyCornforth Sat 08-Apr-23 12:22:28

Hello 👋
Just that. A straw poll.
It would be interesting to see the lay of the land with this.
See how it goes


volver3 Sun 09-Apr-23 08:55:39

Mollygo

^Why do people always pick disgraced politicians forward when they think of possible presidents?^
Because there’s a 50/50 chance that that’s what we’d get, same as we do with prime ministers or first ministers or finance ministers etc. Somebody, somewhere would disapprove. Their murky pasts would be dragged into the limelight and rumours would fly around and be used as reasons why they are unsuitable.
Or, the public would vote by a majority for something those in charge would not accept-like the Boaty McBoatface débùcle.

We already vote for a government. Our votes decide on who will actually run the country.

Do you think we're not capable of deciding who hands out money on Maundy Thursday and shakes hands with Macron?

Should we just shelve this democracy lark altogether?

Fleurpepper Sun 09-Apr-23 08:48:58

I shall be in rural Tuscany with no UK TV - ah well ...

Mollygo Sun 09-Apr-23 08:32:52

Why do people always pick disgraced politicians forward when they think of possible presidents?
Because there’s a 50/50 chance that that’s what we’d get, same as we do with prime ministers or first ministers or finance ministers etc. Somebody, somewhere would disapprove. Their murky pasts would be dragged into the limelight and rumours would fly around and be used as reasons why they are unsuitable.
Or, the public would vote by a majority for something those in charge would not accept-like the Boaty McBoatface débùcle.

volver3 Sun 09-Apr-23 07:48:24

vegansrock

Why do people always pick disgraced politicians forward when they think of possible presidents? They wouldn’t be the only choices. Charles or William could stand as head of state if they really wanted the job and may even get elected if that’s who people actually wanted. There is more chance of getting someone genuinely popular or worthy as the current system which depends on an accident of birth - why not someone like David Attenborough or (bless him) Paul O Grady, or someone like President Zelenskyy? They’d get max of a 8 year stint then someone else worthy can do the job.

I've tried saying exactly that before vegansrock. It won't get you anywhere.

Rowantree Sun 09-Apr-23 07:36:09

A loud NAY whilst assembling the guillotine.

vegansrock Sun 09-Apr-23 06:38:51

it’s a Nay and Meh from me.

vegansrock Sun 09-Apr-23 06:37:34

Why do people always pick disgraced politicians forward when they think of possible presidents? They wouldn’t be the only choices. Charles or William could stand as head of state if they really wanted the job and may even get elected if that’s who people actually wanted. There is more chance of getting someone genuinely popular or worthy as the current system which depends on an accident of birth - why not someone like David Attenborough or (bless him) Paul O Grady, or someone like President Zelenskyy? They’d get max of a 8 year stint then someone else worthy can do the job.

rubysong Sun 09-Apr-23 00:48:58

Definitely yay and good luck to the King and Queen. The thought of a Republic with a President has no appeal. At least we know who we are getting and don't have to go through elections, with prospects like Boris or Tony Blair putting themselves forward.

biglouis Sat 08-Apr-23 23:38:10

Meh with yeh tendencies. Will probably watch at least some of it live.

Summerlove Sat 08-Apr-23 23:37:31

Meh

I’ll still watch it, but I’m feeling very disillusioned

henetha Sat 08-Apr-23 23:27:47

Yay. I'm a monarchist. And I like Charles. I'll watch every bit of it.
(Just to cheer up my miserable life of course, my only activity being to tug my forelock every five minutes and
practically breaking my hip with all the curtsying I do. grin)

BigBertha1 Sat 08-Apr-23 22:32:06

Yes for me. He is a good man I think and has already achieved a great many things. I shall be watching on TV and wishing I lived n London again. We shall toast Good King Charles in champagne and enjoy the whole event.

fancythat Sat 08-Apr-23 22:08:07

Well yay. But wont take that much to make me a Nay.

lixy Sat 08-Apr-23 21:58:51

Nay; will be busy washing my hair that weekend.

Freya5 Sat 08-Apr-23 21:57:38

Yes, most definitely. My sister even flying in to watch and celebrate. 1000 years of history will not be decimated by the few bleating republicans. Its been tried once, Olli Cromwell, look how well that ended. Be carefull what you wish for.

Mollygo Sat 08-Apr-23 21:45:26

Yay with meh tendencies. We are visiting my sister in law who lives in a village which is big on celebrations.
I like watching the pomp, ceremony, tradition and history.

Fleurpepper Sat 08-Apr-23 21:37:50

meh

swampy1961 Sat 08-Apr-23 21:23:54

Yay!! History in the making!!

Bridie22 Sat 08-Apr-23 21:03:15

Yay from me .đŸ€Ž

nadateturbe Sat 08-Apr-23 21:00:27

Nay, but I'll watch it 😁.

nadateturbe Sat 08-Apr-23 20:59:43

Nat, but I'll watch it 😁.

Grany Sat 08-Apr-23 20:50:49

@guardiannews
Royals made almost ÂŁ2m from sale of horses received as gifts from prominent figures dlvr.it/Sm6tzd

India. A lot of colonial loot in Royal jewels

Guardian
How much do royals get and what work, behind the secrecy

Callistemon21 Sat 08-Apr-23 20:23:03

Deedaa

I was just old enough to remember some of the Queen' coronation - Queen Salote in her open carriage in the rain for instance. It will be interesting to see how this one compares.

Wasn't she just wonderful!!
🙂

Deedaa Sat 08-Apr-23 20:16:50

I was just old enough to remember some of the Queen' coronation - Queen Salote in her open carriage in the rain for instance. It will be interesting to see how this one compares.

Grannyben Sat 08-Apr-23 20:11:32

Watching it!