Luckygirl3
What would replace the monarchy?
Maybe we could have a genuinely pared-down slim-line monarchy as some other countries do. We pay a decent salary to a king or queen and expenses for royal duties and that's it.
Upkeep of their many properties, estates and art collections would be their responsibility, just like other property owners.
The cost of ceremonials that increase tourist income could be regarded as expenses, but the final say over reasonable costs should rest with the government as our representatives.
We do not have to go straight down the presidential route - give a pared down monarchy a go and if that fails, then move on to presidential.
I've just watched a young person (another one) who told the story of how she was helped by The Prince's Trust. She was in prison at the time, started being helped by the Trust then, and has gone on to set up her own florist's business plus two cafés. She said that Prince Charles, as he then was, took a personal interest, came to meet all her staff and see how she had succeeded, with the help of the Trust, to turn her life around.
Over one million young people have been helped by the Trust over the years.
I can't see a short-term President beginning and following through on anything like this of this scale.
What would have happened to those young people?