Gransnet forums

News & politics

The Refugee Ship

(445 Posts)
nanna8 Tue 18-Jul-23 13:52:15

I couldn’t believe this. Tell me it isn’t true. Back to the 18 th century.

Germanshepherdsmum Sun 23-Jul-23 16:21:25

Yes, I think that’s right GG.

Glorianny Sun 23-Jul-23 16:40:24

GrannyGravy13

Hoteliers charge VAT on rooms.

The Government will therefore be paying VAT on its bills for the hotels it has commandeered.

Not necessarily. The hotels are booked on a contract basis with hotel owners being offered a one year guaranteed 100% occupancy for a specified sum. This hotelier refused www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11434403/Hotel-owner-turns-1m-Government-offer-house-migrants-ruined-business.html
There is the added attraction for owners of needing less staff which increases profits.
The cost of the barge is even more dodgy. Housing asylum seekers is becoming a big and profitable business for some.

Germanshepherdsmum Sun 23-Jul-23 16:46:43

A business supplying services is required to charge VAT if income exceeds the VAT threshold.

What’s dodgy about the cost of the barge? Someone owns it and has rented it out to house asylum seekers. Same principle as the hotels,

GrannyGravy13 Sun 23-Jul-23 17:03:48

Glorianny

GrannyGravy13

Hoteliers charge VAT on rooms.

The Government will therefore be paying VAT on its bills for the hotels it has commandeered.

Not necessarily. The hotels are booked on a contract basis with hotel owners being offered a one year guaranteed 100% occupancy for a specified sum. This hotelier refused www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11434403/Hotel-owner-turns-1m-Government-offer-house-migrants-ruined-business.html
There is the added attraction for owners of needing less staff which increases profits.
The cost of the barge is even more dodgy. Housing asylum seekers is becoming a big and profitable business for some.

Hotels are businesses, all businesses pay VAT if their turnover exceeds £85,000 this is the threshold until March 2024.

Dickens Sun 23-Jul-23 18:12:10

GrannyGravy13

Glorianny

GrannyGravy13

Hoteliers charge VAT on rooms.

The Government will therefore be paying VAT on its bills for the hotels it has commandeered.

Not necessarily. The hotels are booked on a contract basis with hotel owners being offered a one year guaranteed 100% occupancy for a specified sum. This hotelier refused www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11434403/Hotel-owner-turns-1m-Government-offer-house-migrants-ruined-business.html
There is the added attraction for owners of needing less staff which increases profits.
The cost of the barge is even more dodgy. Housing asylum seekers is becoming a big and profitable business for some.

Hotels are businesses, all businesses pay VAT if their turnover exceeds £85,000 this is the threshold until March 2024.

I can quite understand the hotelier refusing, considering his future bookings and how this might affect his reputation, but I don't quite understand why he was so offended at being asked!

It's nothing 'personal' - the HO are just searching around to find what might be considered suitable accommodation in a rather desperate situation, basically anywhere where they can just plonk the migrants... he only had to say, thanks but no thanks.

There was one hotelier, some time ago now, who was quite glad to accept the offer because for some reason, he was not doing too well and was relieved to be given the chance to survive. Although how that will work out ultimately is anyone's guess.

Glorianny Sun 23-Jul-23 18:26:14

GrannyGravy13

Glorianny

GrannyGravy13

Hoteliers charge VAT on rooms.

The Government will therefore be paying VAT on its bills for the hotels it has commandeered.

Not necessarily. The hotels are booked on a contract basis with hotel owners being offered a one year guaranteed 100% occupancy for a specified sum. This hotelier refused www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11434403/Hotel-owner-turns-1m-Government-offer-house-migrants-ruined-business.html
There is the added attraction for owners of needing less staff which increases profits.
The cost of the barge is even more dodgy. Housing asylum seekers is becoming a big and profitable business for some.

Hotels are businesses, all businesses pay VAT if their turnover exceeds £85,000 this is the threshold until March 2024.

Of course the business does, but if the government is is questionable. I've already said this.
For hotels it is currently 9%

GrannyGravy13 Sun 23-Jul-23 18:29:18

Sorry Glorianny it’s back at 20% now.

Source - Government website

Glorianny Sun 23-Jul-23 18:30:59

Germanshepherdsmum

A business supplying services is required to charge VAT if income exceeds the VAT threshold.

What’s dodgy about the cost of the barge? Someone owns it and has rented it out to house asylum seekers. Same principle as the hotels,

The barge has been widely proclaimed as better value than hotels, but it isn't.
www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/23651735.portland-barge-more-expensive-hotels-asylum-seekers/

GrannyGravy13 Sun 23-Jul-23 18:41:14

Wherever the asylum seekers are housed it’s going to cost money.

There are only so many hoteliers willing to risk the loss of any future business by giving over their premises to the Government to house asylum seekers.

Where else can they be housed, there is not enough social housing as it is. It takes months to build a house (not kit houses).

Germanshepherdsmum Sun 23-Jul-23 18:45:02

Don’t you think the local rag has an agenda? Exactly what is
the alternative!

Joseann Sun 23-Jul-23 19:23:14

I'm sure I remember Weymouth hosting the water events for the 2012 Olympics - like sailing, canoeing etc. What happened to the village accommodation that was built for the contestants? I assume the town has used it as social housing which must have been a big benefit. Maybe there aren't so many homeless needy British nationals in that town now, so they won't resent the barge as much?

Freya5 Sun 23-Jul-23 20:11:37

Joseann

I'm sure I remember Weymouth hosting the water events for the 2012 Olympics - like sailing, canoeing etc. What happened to the village accommodation that was built for the contestants? I assume the town has used it as social housing which must have been a big benefit. Maybe there aren't so many homeless needy British nationals in that town now, so they won't resent the barge as much?

Really, at least these migrants can get,free health dental care. Free meals, laundry facilities etc. Free gym,TV, subscription paid for, wi fi, paid for, free utilities, free transport, in fact free everything , just because ,possibly, our homeless population have been housed , , they will still have to pay,possibly on minimum wage, much more than these people will have to pay for. They may well have to go without some utilities, and food. No whining about poor WiFi, they have no WiFi.

Callistemon21 Sun 23-Jul-23 22:30:59

Joseann

I'm sure I remember Weymouth hosting the water events for the 2012 Olympics - like sailing, canoeing etc. What happened to the village accommodation that was built for the contestants? I assume the town has used it as social housing which must have been a big benefit. Maybe there aren't so many homeless needy British nationals in that town now, so they won't resent the barge as much?

The accommodation for the athletes was a hotel or Pontins on the bay, which was being refurbished I remember..

Callistemon21 Sun 23-Jul-23 22:36:06

Joseann

I'm sure I remember Weymouth hosting the water events for the 2012 Olympics - like sailing, canoeing etc. What happened to the village accommodation that was built for the contestants? I assume the town has used it as social housing which must have been a big benefit. Maybe there aren't so many homeless needy British nationals in that town now, so they won't resent the barge as much?

Some of it is socal housing, some sold to private owners.

Primrose53 Tue 25-Jul-23 11:46:20

Yes, I know it’s the DM, but it’s an exclusive so others will follow suit.

Seems you can buy your way in from dodgy solicitors if you are a refugee. They make up stories about how you cannot possibly be returned to your country for various reasons. the more they pile it on the better.

In our area we had a couple claiming to be fleeing war in the Congo, they were housed, provided with money, furniture, food etc and people were bending over backwards to help. Then the guy decided to kill his partner and when her body was found in a ditch more extensive enquiries were carried out. They had been living quite happily in Holland for 10 years before turning up here with their pack of lies.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12333013/Immigration-law-firms-LIE-authorities-win-asylum.html

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 25-Jul-23 12:12:39

It wouldn’t surprise me Primrose. I have come across some so-called solicitors with such a poor command of English that I have strongly suspected they paid someone to sit their exams for them. There was no way that their grasp of the language would have permitted them to understand and pass exams in such a complex subject. Ideally placed for immigration work I would say.

pascal30 Tue 25-Jul-23 15:46:53

I think that British citizens, especially young working families, should be given housing priority.. and as I've said before that immigrants should be allowed to work much more quickly and pay for their own accomodation.. quicker processing is really the only way forward

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 25-Jul-23 16:09:02

I agree that British citizens should have priority when it comes to housing.
I agree that the processing needs to be done more quickly but I wonder to what extent the problem is the lack of identification? I have no idea how they begin to confirm the identity or profession of a person who has no papers and claims to come from a country which doesn’t keep proper records or whose records have been destroyed by warfare. Do they end up taking someone on trust?

Nicenanny3 Tue 25-Jul-23 17:03:36

11:46Primrose53

Yes big business aiding the Illegal boat migrants, lots of money to be made illegally or legally by the so called human rights lawyers no wonder they don't want to stop the boats.

Casdon Tue 25-Jul-23 17:12:34

Germanshepherdsmum

I agree that British citizens should have priority when it comes to housing.
I agree that the processing needs to be done more quickly but I wonder to what extent the problem is the lack of identification? I have no idea how they begin to confirm the identity or profession of a person who has no papers and claims to come from a country which doesn’t keep proper records or whose records have been destroyed by warfare. Do they end up taking someone on trust?

They are questioned in detail when they first enter Europe, fingerprints taken, all available details gathered and any documentation they are carrying at that stage is copied and stored, many are carrying I’d when they first arrive. If UK was still in Eurodac we would be able to access that information. It will be a priority for the next government to get that reinstated.

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 25-Jul-23 17:14:23

I have previously posted - to much opprobrium - that I call these firms Scummy & Co - because I genuinely doubt the qualifications and integrity of many of them. I have seen enough during my career to consider that that is not inaccurate. We’re not talking about the highly respectable Amal Clooneys of this world, we’re talking about so-called lawyers prepared to fabricate stories at the expense of the taxpayer.

Nicenanny3 Tue 25-Jul-23 17:17:38

I would think it would be almost impossible to process the Illegal boat migrants who have destroyed their ID and the smuggling gangs tell them what to say in order to stay here, most are computer savvy and know exactly how to game the system. Illegal crossings have shot up since 2018 just look at this chart from Migration Watch.

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 25-Jul-23 17:29:26

I really can’t imagine how you identify them. The smugglers have become much more sophisticated. It’s virtually an impossible task given the numbers constantly arriving. I don’t lay blame at the door of the government. How many of us can m

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 25-Jul-23 17:31:21

Make any suggestions as to how you identify someone with no papers who claims to come from a country where there’s little or no chance of tracing them? Not me, that’s for sure.

Casdon Tue 25-Jul-23 17:35:54

DNA sampling. If you think about how Ancestry dot.com works, they have to be identifying people through their DNA. There are increasingly few secrets now. As mentioned above, papers are destroyed on crossing the channel, but that doesn’t mean that they didn’t carry them when they left their originating country. There are four different routes at least into Europe too.