Gransnet forums

News & politics

Covid enquiry

(57 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Fri 20-Oct-23 06:50:37

I have been dipping in and out of this enquiry.

Anyone listening to this would never ever for one mili-second consider voting Tory ever again.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 21-Oct-23 01:18:51

Aveline

Or many more could have died?

No quite the opposite according to all the scientists, doctors etc.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 21-Oct-23 01:21:39

aveline you still haven’t listened to any of the Covid enquiry have you? 😄

Whitewavemark2 Sat 21-Oct-23 08:09:27

Companies etc now providing evidence that PPE contracts were delayed by the government to allow their cronies to get their application in as VIPs and gain the lucrative contracts.

So people were wearing big bags because of this delay.

MaizieD Sat 21-Oct-23 09:10:15

Whitewavemark2

Aveline

Or many more could have died?

No quite the opposite according to all the scientists, doctors etc.

I'm not sure that I can work out what Aveline is talking about.

Thousands of people died unnecessarily because the government hadn't a clue what it was doing and didn't give a toss about people's lives. The evidence is there in the evidence of those working to try to stem the effects of the pandemic.

The government still doesn't give a toss. If it did it would pay the NHS staff properly and fund it properly. 7million people on the waiting lists because government does nothing is utterly disgraceful.

Aveline Sat 21-Oct-23 10:23:31

The vaccines were developed and used rapidly and saved many lives. The furlough scheme saved many livelihoods. The pandemic was not something any government had ever faced before. Of course it's extremely easy to point out where they went wrong now. Not so easy in the heat of the moment.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 21-Oct-23 10:26:59

Aveline

The vaccines were developed and used rapidly and saved many lives. The furlough scheme saved many livelihoods. The pandemic was not something any government had ever faced before. Of course it's extremely easy to point out where they went wrong now. Not so easy in the heat of the moment.

How do you reply to the detail given in evidence by civil servants, scientists and doctors at the covid enquiry?

Aveline Sat 21-Oct-23 10:51:02

How do you reply to the charge that there's more to the situation than civil servants doctors and scientists? How you respond to the fact that government is comprised of humans doing their best in a horrible situation. Picking over the bones in retrospect may provide you with some satisfaction of course. I do hope you continue to enjoy the findings as they are bound to fit your perspectives.

growstuff Sat 21-Oct-23 11:19:24

Any government is comprised of humans who need to listen to people who know what they're talking about.

MaizieD Sat 21-Oct-23 11:45:16

How you respond to the fact that government is comprised of humans doing their best in a horrible situation.

If that were a fact the situation would be quite different.

Was the PM who wrote 'BOLLOCKS' on a paper about Long Covid ', or said 'let the bodies pile high', doing his best'?

Were the ministers who were insisting that their friends and donors, with no experience in the field and completely new 'companies', be given preferential treatment when tendering for PPE supplies,supplies which mostly turned out to be useless, when established suppliers were begging to supply quality PPE and being completely ignored, 'doing their best'?

This has been known about for a long, long time.

I suggest you look at the evidence, Aveline, rather than try to excuse an incompetent and corrupt government.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 21-Oct-23 11:50:08

Yep

Katie59 Sat 21-Oct-23 12:22:50

I was one of those that worked all through Covid, the only protection I had was a plastic screen, most customers wore masks but I dont believe they provided much if any protection. There were a few staff with preexisting conditions that took time off, even they were back after 3 months, most of us tested positive eventually and took a week off.

The vaccination programme undoubtedly saved live but I don’t believe Test and Trace or movement restrictions made the slightest difference. The virus was everywhere we all got exposed to it quickly, we were either vulnerable or we were not.

MaizieD Sat 21-Oct-23 13:13:45

Why don't you believe that the masks the 'customers' wore provided much, if any, protection, Katie59?

^ The virus was everywhere^

Have you watched or read any of the evidence to the covid inquiry? It does confirm what many people were saying at the time, that steps to contain the virus should have been implemented earlier. Then it might not have been so widespread...

growstuff Sat 21-Oct-23 15:42:59

Katie59

I was one of those that worked all through Covid, the only protection I had was a plastic screen, most customers wore masks but I dont believe they provided much if any protection. There were a few staff with preexisting conditions that took time off, even they were back after 3 months, most of us tested positive eventually and took a week off.

The vaccination programme undoubtedly saved live but I don’t believe Test and Trace or movement restrictions made the slightest difference. The virus was everywhere we all got exposed to it quickly, we were either vulnerable or we were not.

With an airborne virus all masks provide some degree of protection - some more than others.

growstuff Sat 21-Oct-23 15:46:56

Of course movement restrictions made a difference. If 1 in 20 people is infected and you're in a room of 100 people, there's a 20% chance somebody is infected. If you're in a room with 10 people, there's a 50% chance nobody is infected.

rosie1959 Sat 21-Oct-23 16:18:55

Despite the length and time of this enquiry will anything actually come from it that will have a positive effect on any event in the future
Hopefully they will look back and see what worked and what didn’t as some of the ‘rules’ were just plain daft

MayBee70 Sat 21-Oct-23 17:51:18

rosie1959

Despite the length and time of this enquiry will anything actually come from it that will have a positive effect on any event in the future
Hopefully they will look back and see what worked and what didn’t as some of the ‘rules’ were just plain daft

When thousands of people have died, possibly needlessly and due to governmental incompetence, do you not think there needs to be an enquiry then?

rosie1959 Sat 21-Oct-23 18:05:14

But if they find this out MayBee what happens then.
Many sadly lost their lives but could it ever be proved without any doubt at all this was due to government actions or just the virus doing what it did best.
Are other countries spending months doing this.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 21-Oct-23 19:15:15

rosie1959

But if they find this out MayBee what happens then.
Many sadly lost their lives but could it ever be proved without any doubt at all this was due to government actions or just the virus doing what it did best.
Are other countries spending months doing this.

Not months is our case years!! Other countries have spent months. And every country as far as I am aware in Europe had an enquiry as to how it was handled.

AskAlice Sat 21-Oct-23 19:28:47

I don't usually comment on these threads, but I think your maths may be a bit out, growstuff. If i in 20 people are affected and you are in a room with 100 people. that means that 5 people out of the 100 will be affected. That means that 5% of people are affected, not a 20% chance of you being affected. It depends on who you are in contact with in that room, surely?

MaizieD Sat 21-Oct-23 19:56:33

Statistically you could well be correct, AskAlice but as covid spreads by means of inhaling aerosols, which spread widely and persist for a long time in the air, if no-one in the room is masked and the ventilation is poor, the actual chance of being infected is very high. Probably can't be predicted by statistics...

Just to complicate things...

growstuff Sat 21-Oct-23 21:44:18

AskAlice

I don't usually comment on these threads, but I think your maths may be a bit out, growstuff. If i in 20 people are affected and you are in a room with 100 people. that means that 5 people out of the 100 will be affected. That means that 5% of people are affected, not a 20% chance of you being affected. It depends on who you are in contact with in that room, surely?

Sorry, you're right. I changed it from 1 in 20, but was in a hurry and didn't check properly. Silly me! The point is, though, that if you're in a less crowded environment, you are at less risk.

growstuff Sat 21-Oct-23 21:45:41

To some extent it depends whom you stand close to, but there's also an aerosol effect, which means that the air becomes more saturated with virus particles.

Oldbat1 Sun 22-Oct-23 08:06:48

For those who dont follow the enquiry in detail the BBC do a brief Podcast which lasts roughly 10mins “The Covid Enquiry”. You can hear for yourself the Scientists speaking about Dr Death.

MaizieD Sun 22-Oct-23 08:17:45

Oldbat1

For those who dont follow the enquiry in detail the BBC do a brief Podcast which lasts roughly 10mins “The Covid Enquiry”. You can hear for yourself the Scientists speaking about Dr Death.

There will be plenty of time to catch up with the evidence so far (transcripts and videos available on the Inquiry website) as there will be no more public hearings until 30th October.

Johnson and Sunak are due to give evidence in early November. I wonder if they will have managed to recover their lost Whatsapps by then. 🤔

Whitewavemark2 Sun 22-Oct-23 08:23:29

I see a minister has resigned from the covid fraud team. He says he can no longer put up with the incompetence etc of Sunak.

The Lords clapped him after making his resignation speech.