growstuff
I really don't have the energy to plough through the latest scheme. However, could somebody please explain something? Am I right in thinking that if somebody fails to be granted asylum in Rwanda, he/she will be returned to the UK? My understanding that's how the government hopes to get round the possibility that failed asylum seekers could be returned to their country of origin or sent to some random third country, which is the main reason the second scheme failed.
Yes that is what I understand to be the case. So bizarrely successful applicants will remain in Rwanda and failed applicants will returned to the U.K.! That is to get around the court judgement of the consideration that Rwanda was shipping “failed” applicants to other war torn countries etc and so failing the “safe” test. The fact that they have killed or tortured the odd one or two refugees doesn’t seem to matter.