Callistemon21
What I don't understand is why some of those who profess to be atheists (not all) are so dismissive of all faiths except Islam, which is defended so robustly by those same posters?
It's an anomaly.
I'm not dismissive of other faiths. I have never in my life felt a need or desire to pray or believed there is any kind of god.
Nevertheless, there have been times when I have said grace at formal meals and I don't know how many Christian-based assemblies I sat through as a pupil and teacher. My children were forced to go to C of E primary schools because there was no choice. I respect other people's faith (all faiths) and don't argue against them.
I actually think Birbalsingh has made this a "wedge" issue because she knows she'll be supported by the anti-woke brigade. Personally, I think all state schools should be 100% secular, which means abandoning the legal requirement for a daily act of collective worship of broadly Christian nature and forcing pupils to sing "God save the king* at the beginning of the school day (as Michaela does).
I really couldn't care less whether some pupils pray during their lunch breaks (or spend five minutes standing on one leg for all I care). If (as alleged) some pupils and staff have been bullied, it should have been dealt with under the school's anti-bullying policies or by the police. As the self-identified "strictest headteacher", I'm sure Birbalsingh could have coped with bullying - that's what strict headteachers do well. I find it difficult to believe that pupils would behave so badly while not directly supervised when praying, if the school's discipline policies are so effective. In any case, how on earth has the prayer ban stopped the threats? It doesn't add up.
The whole thing smacks of self-publicity and hypocrisy.