CoolCoco
I wasn’t “ negative about a man who has cancer” - apologies if I gave that impression - I was referring to the endless unnecessary media coverage - speculation of the impact, this that and the other, live broadcast from outside Buckingham Palace , even a piece on the history of the King’s health issues over the years, how will the government cope etc. I have every sympathy for anyone with cancer, it’s a horrible illness as I know personally, but do we need all this repetition and speculation? All they need to say is we wish him and everyone else with cancer well. He is getting first class treatment. Any further updates we’ll let you know.
He is a man as well as a king. Men are notorious for ignoring the signs and symptoms of cancer until it is entrenched enough to be inoperable, just as they ignore the signs and symptoms of prostate problems. Charles being open about his prostate, and the media using the chance to publicise that he was having treatment and explain about the condition, sent many men to their GPs who would not otherwise have made the appointment.
If the publicity encourages a similar number to seek treatment for cancer, it can only be a good thing.
As for all the talk about who would be taking over his duties while he is treated, and so on, many people would wonder, and a large proportion of those wondering would make the wrong guess about who it would be. Any chance to dispel the general ignorance about the arrangements for a temporary replacement of our head of state (no, it wouldn't be Harry and Meghan) or any of the other ways that things are done in the UK, can't be bad.
Switch your radio over to Classic FM if you don't want to hear it.