Gransnet forums

News & politics

The Mirror Group pays Harry

(128 Posts)
Glorianny Fri 09-Feb-24 16:48:05

Great news that the Mirror Group have had to pay up and pay Harry's legal costs. It must be great news for the 100 other cases that are still outstanding. It should never have taken this long.
news.sky.com/story/prince-harry-and-mirror-publisher-settle-remaining-parts-of-hacking-claim-13067258#:~:text=Mirror%20Group%20Newspapers%20(MGN)%20have,

Callistemon21 Sat 10-Feb-24 10:21:10

Callistemon21

Syracute

Louella12

I thought he wanted his day in court.

This will be the best way for him I guess. Obviously a lot of his complaints were thrown out.

It would have saved a lot of time and money if he'd settled like William did

Well if everything is kept quiet you would never know what the tabloids get up to . The Royal family has their life under a microscope and it’s sad the repercussions it has on them all . Yet the British public laps up all this salacious gossip at the financial benefit of the publishing dynasties like the Murdochs.

the British public

That's rather a generalisation.

Netflix, which made the ludicrous series The Crown, lapped up by many in the USA, is an American company I believe.

A question often asked is "Why are Americans so obsessed with the British Royal Family?" It's very odd, since the USA disassociated itself from Britain in 1776.

"Let’s be real: America is absolutely obsessed with the royal family."
www.michigandaily.com/tv/the-problem-with-the-crown-the-british-monarchy-and-americas-obsession-with-the-royal-family%EF%BF%BC/

Anniebach Sat 10-Feb-24 10:13:34

Harry flew back to present a football award in L.A. Must have been his choice when to visit his father

Callistemon21 Sat 10-Feb-24 10:11:58

Syracute

Louella12

I thought he wanted his day in court.

This will be the best way for him I guess. Obviously a lot of his complaints were thrown out.

It would have saved a lot of time and money if he'd settled like William did

Well if everything is kept quiet you would never know what the tabloids get up to . The Royal family has their life under a microscope and it’s sad the repercussions it has on them all . Yet the British public laps up all this salacious gossip at the financial benefit of the publishing dynasties like the Murdochs.

the British public

That's rather a generalisation.

MissAdventure Sat 10-Feb-24 10:09:38

Harry couldn't stay longer?
Yesterday it was written that the king only allowed him a half an hour or 45 min (however long it was)

Anniebach Sat 10-Feb-24 09:43:44

He said it’s his mission in life

Oreo Sat 10-Feb-24 09:38:28

maddyone

You’re right Rosie, it’s two separate issues.

Issue one; phone hacking by the Mirror group is morally wrong and I believe illegal. The group has been punished for doing this by making them pay compensation.

Issue two; Harry has compromised the privacy of his family by writing and speaking about them. He has made allegations against them, knowing they won’t retaliate or sue him. This is morally wrong on every level, but probably not illegal, unless he has not spoken the truth, but it doesn’t make any difference anyway because truth or lie, or just exaggeration, he is secure in the knowledge that they won’t react.

Good comments.
Will Harry continually make money from litigation from now on and be on the look out for any chance to do it? There are some people who do this, either out of love of money or paranoia take others to court.
I do wonder when he’ll just enjoy life.

NotSpaghetti Sat 10-Feb-24 09:35:37

I thought that too Louella12
I don't understand why he's settled.

Maybe someone else has read why somewhere??

eazybee Sat 10-Feb-24 09:14:18

No, it isn't a sport.
I think many people are seriously disturbed by Harry's posturing and poor behaviour, particularly at a time when family members are seriously ill. His threats of future action as dragon slayer will only mean more press scrutiny, which I think is what he really desires, because there is precious little purpose in his life at present.

Sarnia Sat 10-Feb-24 09:11:07

I suppose this gives him fodder for another crappy book.

Parsley3 Sat 10-Feb-24 08:35:04

Disagreeing with what Harry has done has turned into a national sport.

MissInterpreted Sat 10-Feb-24 08:25:21

vegansrock

Some people would criticise Harry whatever he did. He didn’t lie about his phone getting hacked which is what this case is about. If he lied about anyone else they should sue. The press print pages of tosh about the RF and people lap it up obviously. It’s good he took a stand with others against the unscrupulous gutter press.

My point exactly. You can disagree all you like with what Harry has done, but that doesn't justify anyone hacking his phone (or anyone's phone, for that matter). They are two separate issues.

vegansrock Sat 10-Feb-24 05:51:30

You can bet your life the press won’t print pages of guff about this case

vegansrock Sat 10-Feb-24 05:50:30

Some people would criticise Harry whatever he did. He didn’t lie about his phone getting hacked which is what this case is about. If he lied about anyone else they should sue. The press print pages of tosh about the RF and people lap it up obviously. It’s good he took a stand with others against the unscrupulous gutter press.

mae13 Sat 10-Feb-24 05:12:24

I expect that when he arrived back home Sergeant Major Meghan gave him a pat on the head and congratulated him for his win - "good boy Harry!"

Anniebach Sat 10-Feb-24 03:47:33

Harry lies

maddyone Sat 10-Feb-24 03:19:57

You’re right Rosie, it’s two separate issues.

Issue one; phone hacking by the Mirror group is morally wrong and I believe illegal. The group has been punished for doing this by making them pay compensation.

Issue two; Harry has compromised the privacy of his family by writing and speaking about them. He has made allegations against them, knowing they won’t retaliate or sue him. This is morally wrong on every level, but probably not illegal, unless he has not spoken the truth, but it doesn’t make any difference anyway because truth or lie, or just exaggeration, he is secure in the knowledge that they won’t react.

Rosie51 Sat 10-Feb-24 00:22:24

Callistemon I agree with your post at 22.44.

Of course phone hacking is wrong, and I'm glad the Mirror group are being punished. I too believe Piers Morgan had to know it was going on even if he chose "not to". I imagine it may be difficult to prove he knew or authorised it, so I expect he'll get away with it. While it may be a separate issue, I don't understand those who would excuse Harry (who is rightly incensed at his privacy being abused) when he does exactly the same thing for financial gain. Just because he uses books and TV appearances rather than a newspaper, the motives are the same, to make money. In fact Harry's seem to go further, revenge, which is not an attractive trait.

Syracute Sat 10-Feb-24 00:17:10

Louella12

I thought he wanted his day in court.

This will be the best way for him I guess. Obviously a lot of his complaints were thrown out.

It would have saved a lot of time and money if he'd settled like William did

Well if everything is kept quiet you would never know what the tabloids get up to . The Royal family has their life under a microscope and it’s sad the repercussions it has on them all . Yet the British public laps up all this salacious gossip at the financial benefit of the publishing dynasties like the Murdochs.

Louella12 Fri 09-Feb-24 23:33:05

I thought he wanted his day in court.

This will be the best way for him I guess. Obviously a lot of his complaints were thrown out.

It would have saved a lot of time and money if he'd settled like William did

Callistemon21 Fri 09-Feb-24 23:06:47

MissAdventure

Good for Harry.
Its about time someone took a stand.

He is not the only person to sue the Mirror Group.

MissAdventure Fri 09-Feb-24 23:00:33

Good for Harry.
Its about time someone took a stand.

nanna8 Fri 09-Feb-24 22:54:35

I wonder if the Americans hack Harry the Horrible’s phone? Probably wouldn’t bother, too boring. As a point of principle it is good that the Mirror was found guilty, shame that HTH is guilty of invading privacy himself and that it wasn’t someone innocent who brought the case.

Anniebach Fri 09-Feb-24 22:47:16

Yes Callistemon

Callistemon21 Fri 09-Feb-24 22:44:38

Of course Morgan knew what was happening.
The Mirror Group was wrong and perhaps this will bring an end to this kind of activity by the media.

However, it's surprising that views are so polarised on here.

The judge found that the Mirror Group hacked Harry's phone to a modest extent.
That does not mean that Harry's behaviour towards his family is not treacherous.

Both The Mirror Group and Harry are guilty of invasion of privacy. It is wrong and causes a great deal of stress.

Labradora Fri 09-Feb-24 22:33:26

I've already posted on this but I do think its important to differentiate any feelings we might have about a particular celebrity from the illegality of phone tapping.
I don't particularly like Hugh Grant, for example , but I still don't think anyone has the right to hack his phone.
I don't think it's the same as the "celebrities use the press so they can't complain when the press uses them argument". I think that applies to celebs falling drunkenly out of London night clubs into the cameras of the Paparazzi; What do they expect ? Phone tapping is more like taking photos of people with long lenses ; the subjects believe themselves to be completely private so should not be snapped . This happened to both Fergie and Princess Kate and it's not cricket.
I didn't know about Nigel Havers but we all know about Milly Dowler and the distress that caused.
I wouldn't like anyone listening to my phone except it would serve them right because they .... would.... be.....bored......to.....Death!