Gransnet forums

News & politics

Nothing Behind The Eyes

(35 Posts)
Mel1967 Fri 03-May-24 22:29:34

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1wx9l2x200o

How sad.
What are your thoughts?

valdavi Fri 03-May-24 22:47:51

24 fatal stabbings in London so far this year, I don't know, as a female in my 60's I can't understand the reasons behind it. Mikey was especially tragic as he was at a friend's birthday party & his family couldn't have imagined a thing like this might happen there. Tragic for the families of the other boys too.

YorkLady Fri 03-May-24 22:48:14

I’m sorry but there is so much spam on here lately that I’m no longer following links.
Could you perhaps give us a little more information who this is regarding. Thanks

Marydoll Fri 03-May-24 22:50:31

I find it incredibly sad. So many lives changed for ever, because of one young man's actions.

Marydoll Fri 03-May-24 22:51:34

YorkLady

I’m sorry but there is so much spam on here lately that I’m no longer following links.
Could you perhaps give us a little more information who this is regarding. Thanks

This a legitimate link.

Callistemon21 Fri 03-May-24 22:57:48

You're right to be suspicious, but it's a BBC link, YorkLady.

Mel1967 this has been on our local news a lot, including interviews with Mikey's mother Hayley.
Every time I see her I weep, this was another needless loss of life.

The main perpetrator has got life which is, apparently, a minimum of 16 years imprisonment. That is not 'life'.
He could be out by the age of 32.

Other murderers are found guilty of manslaughter through diminished responsibility.

Until sentencing is more stringent and sentences are longer, these murders will continue.

M0nica Fri 03-May-24 22:58:02

The chances of being known, arrested and imprisoned in these youth knifing cases is close to 100%.

Even given the 'live in the minute' life of most teenagers, Why cannot these lads realise that carrying a knife and using it on someone else is an absolutely sure way of spending the rest of their teens and 20s in prison.

M0nica Fri 03-May-24 23:02:58

Callistemon the 16.5 years is a minimum time in prison. He has a life sentence and will be on licence for his whole life and can be called back to prison at any time. there is also no guarantee he will be out after 16.5 years, it all depends on his behaviour aand progress in prison.

At 16, 16 years is quite literally a lifetime.

Callistemon21 Fri 03-May-24 23:05:28

I know how the system works but it still seems inadequate to me.

It still means he can be out at a young age, and have a life, have a family.
I don't think he should.

welbeck Fri 03-May-24 23:13:37

that is a valid point, i think.
when capital punishment was campaigned against, it was always envisioned that the alternative was life in prison, meaning the rest of the person's life, except in v rare circumstances.

M0nica Sat 04-May-24 09:31:35

Callistemon no matter how dreadful this lads crime is. he is only 16. He is still leaglly and mentally a child. This does not reduce the heinousness of his crime, but it may well be that by the time he is in his 30s he may well be a very different person and should be given the opportunity to return to normal life and contribute something to it.

I am very uncomforable with the way so many people seem to be able to, on one side to stop children under 18 from marrying, smoking, undergoing all kinds of relatively trivial experiences because of their youth and immaturity, yet when that same youth and immaturity leads them to do dreadful thngs immediately want to lock them up for life as if they were hardened criminals.

The minds of children of 16 are malleable and can change. There will be exceptions - and we hear of them, but many more young criminals come out of prison and become useful citizens.

Cossy Sat 04-May-24 09:40:01

M0nica

Callistemon no matter how dreadful this lads crime is. he is only 16. He is still leaglly and mentally a child. This does not reduce the heinousness of his crime, but it may well be that by the time he is in his 30s he may well be a very different person and should be given the opportunity to return to normal life and contribute something to it.

I am very uncomforable with the way so many people seem to be able to, on one side to stop children under 18 from marrying, smoking, undergoing all kinds of relatively trivial experiences because of their youth and immaturity, yet when that same youth and immaturity leads them to do dreadful thngs immediately want to lock them up for life as if they were hardened criminals.

The minds of children of 16 are malleable and can change. There will be exceptions - and we hear of them, but many more young criminals come out of prison and become useful citizens.

I agree but I would also add that we need far more stringent checks on carrying knives, particularly in public areas and schools.

I once worked with a family worker who had been in prison for gun crime, thankfully no one died. Since he’s been out he’s literally dedicated his entire life to educating schools, communities, parents and kids to the danger of gangs, gang mentality and knife and gun crime as well as drugs. He and his lovely wife run a company and work country wide.

He’s used his awful childhood (brought up between women’s refuges, a “runner” at 8, a dealer at 12) and his crimes to the advantage of many and seriously turned his entire life around. I’m proud to have worked alongside him for a short period.

Callistemon21 Sat 04-May-24 13:08:11

They showed no remorse and even laughed in court.

It's going to take a mighty effort and resources we don't see to have to rehabilitate youths such as these so that they can become useful members of society by the time they are 30.

Cossy Sat 04-May-24 13:10:46

Callistemon21

They showed no remorse and even laughed in court.

It's going to take a mighty effort and resources we don't see to have to rehabilitate youths such as these so that they can become useful members of society by the time they are 30.

Perhaps if funding hadn’t been cut in both probation (half privatised) and Youth Offending, we might not have quite as many incidents as we have.

JaneJudge Sat 04-May-24 13:16:53

it's awful and they are all children sad

Callistemon21 Sat 04-May-24 13:20:14

Cunningham went to a 16 year old birthday party in another city (in a nice area of Bath) armed with a knife so he was intending to injure, maim or kill someone.
His intent was to cause evil at a girl's birthday party. There are no excuses, he knew what he was doing.

I think his sentence should be far longer, no matter his age.

"Mikey's mother, Hayley Ryall, cried as her victim impact statement was read out on her behalf in court.

In the statement she said she could not bear to look at photos of her son, knowing she would never see his face again.

She described feeling like she was living in a film, or in a nightmare and said: “The day my Mikey was killed, my life changed forever.

“Christmas used to be magical, but I’ll never celebrate it again.

“New Year was the same; how could I look forward to the year ahead without him?”

Mikey’s father, Michael Roynon, said in his statement: “I feel so tortured at the loss of my boy...I feel like I have a life sentence."

While Mikey's Grandmother Teresa Owen said she would "swap places with Mikey in a heartbeat", if she could."

There is too much concern for the evil perpetrators and not enough for the victims and their families.

Callistemon21 Sat 04-May-24 13:21:42

Some YOIs were like boarding schools with more facilities than many state schools.

Sparklefizz Sat 04-May-24 14:06:48

My grandson had his nose broken last week by 3 lads from his school. They had racially abused my grandson’s girlfriend and when he verbally defended her, all 3 attacked him. Thank goodness no knives were involved. This was in a town in Devon, not some inner city area.

It has been awful for us as a family.

tickingbird Sat 04-May-24 14:31:45

There is too much concern for the evil perpetrators and not enough for the victims and their families.

I totally agree and I don’t like the way certain posters manage to turn everything into the fault of the government.

Fatherless families and feckless parents also contribute greatly to the behaviour of youngsters.

Ziplok Sat 04-May-24 14:42:29

I’m so sorry to hear that Sparklefizz.

GrannyGravy13 Sat 04-May-24 14:47:21

I hope you grandson is ok sparklefizz I know how and your family you must be feeling.

When something similar happened to one of our GC it was heartbreaking for us all, mixed with a very large dose of anger.

Callistemon21 Sat 04-May-24 14:58:21

I hope your grandson is all right, sparklefizz.
I remember when something similar happened to my DS when he was young because he defended a girl (who was not even his girlfriend) and got a black eye for his trouble.
It wasn't so usual to carry knives in those days.

What is wrong nowadays when someone can accidentally bump into someone, perhaps give them a look or defend a friend or even 'look wrong' and then get killed by another youth with no boundaries, no conscience, who is just filled with hate?

Ziplok Sat 04-May-24 15:06:02

I agree that it is not the sole fault of the Government. Parents have (or should have) responsibility for their children, and teach them to be good, responsible citizens with self respect and respect for others. The majority of parents do, of course, take this on fully and do it well. Sadly though, quite often (not always), the upbringing of some of these young people facing the justice system has been chaotic and confused with parents who are poor role models, and they find themselves in a life that often leads to them carrying out violent acts or getting caught up with more hardened criminals, and so getting into trouble with the law, and so facing a life that they had not envisaged as a consequence of those actions, ie, a long term of imprisonment and a police record.

I don’t think fatherless families necessarily mean the children being brought up without one are going to turn to a life of violence and crime, though - that’s a rather sweeping assumption to make - many children are brought up well with just a mother and go on to lead normal, happy lives. (Equally, children brought up with just a father).

Cossy Sat 04-May-24 15:56:23

tickingbird

^There is too much concern for the evil perpetrators and not enough for the victims and their families.^

I totally agree and I don’t like the way certain posters manage to turn everything into the fault of the government.

Fatherless families and feckless parents also contribute greatly to the behaviour of youngsters.

Blaming “single Mums” is far worse than blaming the govt.

I was a single (working) Mum for 9 years, not even once did my well behaved son cause problems.

There are many many good single mums (and dads) bring up decent, well behaved children.

As for “feckless” parents, I’m not sure I even know what this means, but they’re enough documented cases of kids from perfectly stable backgrounds going off the rails.

Cossy Sat 04-May-24 16:02:03

When I attribute some of the blame to the govt I’m talking about cuts in services for vulnerable families and care leavers, such as sure start, family workers, youth clubs and youth services. Some parents need this support to help them to become better, more stable people able to be better role models. I worked with families like these, before our project t lost its funding, and it was a massive eye opener working with vulnerable families in their own homes.