I think you have a good point there, keepingquiet. It was bad enough in HE, where pressures are different but some of this applies, but (speaking from experience of friends and family in teaching), schools are a lot worse.
I’m generalising because there is no alternative, but I think that part of the problem is that people are often promoted when they have few management skills. They might be excellent at subject knowledge and very willing to take on extra responsibilities, but that doesn’t mean that they are able to bring out the best in others. It doesn’t always mean that they want to either, when success can be based on ‘dead man’s shoes’ and promotion is in the gift of colleagues who are looking out for their own careers.
Then there is the pay structure, which means that people who have been there for years get paid a lot more than new starters. This rightly rewards experience, but can lead to some well-paid people resting on their laurels on one hand, and on the other a desire to get rid of experienced people to bring in cheaper ones in higher numbers, neither of which is good for either efficiency or morale. The same things can block opportunities for experienced teachers to move schools, too. Whereas they would bring in new ideas, they are expensive and a possible threat to people on the interview panel.
Then there is government interference, with ministers who have no experience of teaching bringing in measures on a ‘one size fits all’ basis, and reducing the right of teachers to make professional judgments.
I can’t really speak about behaviour and classroom discipline, but can imagine it must be soul-destroying to have to try to teach if you don’t have the backing of a supportive SMT.
Then there’s the commonly held perception that anyone who’s been to school could do the job, and that it’s 9.00-3.00 with months of holiday
. That perception applies to HE too, and it’s a long way from the truth.
I don’t know the answers, as if my generalisations are true (which they may not be) they are a mixture of both centralised control on one hand and the opposite of that (devolution?) on the other.