Oreo
Dickens
Casdon
Mollygo
Do you think Starmer will go for PR, when a small majority of votes got him in?
Everybody talks about the evils of FPTP until they get elected, then it’s seen as OK.
The Labour Party doesn’t support PR, it wasn’t in the manifesto, and the motion at the conference failed - so no.
Correct.
And I believe the last time PR was a 'thing' was at the LP Conferences in '21 and '22.
In 2023 he had what he described as a "longstanding view against proportional representation".
Though during the 2020 Labour leadership election he did say, "On electoral reform, we’ve got to address the fact that millions of people vote in safe seats and they feel their voice doesn’t count. That’s got to be addressed. We will never get full participation in our electoral system until we do that at every level."
... I suppose all politicians revise their ideology, when and as necessary...
They do indeed, depressing at times I find.Anything that gets them into power is good as far as they’re concerned, that goes for all political parties.
The problem is, we are a nation of haves and have nots, and any leader of any party has got to really attempt to appease both - which of course is impossible.
Tory, Labour, Lib Dems - all would be faced with the same issues.
For me, the issue is that Starmer is following the good old Tory line of discussing the economy as if it were run like a household budget which, as you know, it isn't.
I'll just leave this here for consideration...
The arbitrary nature of the fiscal rules is reflected in the fact that, since 1997, they have been significantly changed nine times. If chancellors find the targets too difficult to meet, they change them, making them little more than a tactic in political messaging. There are, therefore, a host of choices involved in Starmer and Rachel Reeves’ decision to choose austerity based on a fictional ‘black hole’. There is a great deal of scepticism about the fiscal rules among economists, and not just left-heterodox ones: a former chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, and the Treasury’s commercial secretary under George Osborne, has since argued that the government should ‘drop such petty and arbitrary fiscal rules that magically claim the deficit in five years’ time will be lower’. Austerity, in any case, does nothing to bring about a falling ratio of debt to GDP: the debt-to-GDP ratio was substantially higher at the end of Tory George Osborne’s period as Chancellor than at the start. The current fiscal rules have been proven to be self-defeating. (Dominic Alexander, Counterfire)
The £22bn ‘black hole’ is no way a hard fact.