Iam64
In public service we were not allowed to accept any gifts. Simple. I’ve never really understood why teachers aren’t included. I’m not suggesting a box of chocs would mean johnie would get better eats results. I do feel it adds to
Pressures on families with mums feeling bad if their money won’t stretch to
The kind of gifts others give. Why not have a charity box where a pound or two can be donated anonymously with the cash used for a local children’s charity or to supplement the cost of school trips.
I agree with you Iam.
It wouldn’t have bothered me if I’d had to declare every box of Maltesers I ever received, and every Poundland ornament too. None of those gifts, given at Christmas or end of year, would change any grades as I didn’t award exam grades, since the children were too small. I’m not opposed to declaring these gifts, or even just informing parents that it’s not allowed.
My argument is that the giving of expensive gifts to politicians is suspect. I don’t care which party we’re talking about, I have no axe to grind for one party or another, my point is that it is a despicable practice, and in the main, done for a purpose.
Funnily enough, I’ve just seen Rebecca Long-Bailey interviewed and she echoed my point of view. She was given an extremely expensive handbag once, even with her initials on it, it was personalised, imagine the cost, and she was extremely embarrassed about it as she feels it’s not appropriate. She felt it too embarrassing to refuse, and so ended up buying the giver an expensive gift back. I understand her embarrassment. She felt the giving of, and receiving of, such an expensive gift, meant there was an expectation of something in return. She doesn’t agree with the giving of gifts to politicians. I agree with her.
What surprises me is that posters are defending this practice. Unbelievable!