Gransnet forums

News & politics

Lord Waheed Alli, has he bought the government?

(335 Posts)
Sago Thu 26-Sept-24 13:25:06

This man seems to have his tentacles everywhere, another story now of him loaning £1.2 million to Siobhan McDonagh.

I fear there is more to come.

How can a government be honest and upright if the MP’s are in Lord Alli’s pocket?

LizzieDrip Fri 27-Sept-24 11:13:11

Perhaps Lord Alli just wants a Labour government - simple as that🤷‍♀️

I am a Labour Party member and I donate £5 here and there, when I can. I want nothing ‘in return’ other than a Labour government to be running the UK because, I believe, they are better for our country.

As a multi millionaire Lord Alli’s thousands mean the same to him as my fiver does to me.

Cossy Fri 27-Sept-24 11:18:19

LizzieDrip

Perhaps Lord Alli just wants a Labour government - simple as that🤷‍♀️

I am a Labour Party member and I donate £5 here and there, when I can. I want nothing ‘in return’ other than a Labour government to be running the UK because, I believe, they are better for our country.

As a multi millionaire Lord Alli’s thousands mean the same to him as my fiver does to me.

This thanks

MaizieD Fri 27-Sept-24 11:31:34

Here we go, it wasn't difficult to find. I can't think why Namsnanny was making such heavy weather of it.

Lord Alli was responding to the publication of the report of the first Leveson Inquiry.

I seem to recall that the Inquiry revealed some horrific press violations of privacy, such as the hacking of a murdered girl's phone. I think this is the 'freedom' that our right wingers want to protect...

hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-01-11/debates/13011146000049/details#contribution-13011147000102

OldFrill Fri 27-Sept-24 11:36:06

Yesterday 21:36Namsnanny

OldFrill

*He actually suggested, about ten years ago, that it might be beneficial to have a state run press regulator. He also suggested they should be a limit on the number of newspapers one company could own.
All this is now being regurgitated and twisted - not least, it seems, by Namsnanny*

^Thats just silly, you choosing to be using inflammatory language.
I'm just quoting and listening to others.^

*It's not silly he said he wanted a state press REGULATOR not a State Press 😉
Of course if it was an honest misinterpretation on your part it's odd you're still pursuing it.

Dinahmo Fri 27-Sept-24 11:41:45

AGAA4

In this case maybe he was being kind but there have been other donations for clothes, loaning a luxury flat to Angela Raynor amongst other gifts.
I just feel this one man is too involved with the Labour party. I know all parties receive freebies and it should stop.

This is ridiculous.

I expect many of us have friends with holiday homes who let us stay in them for a holiday from time to time. The only difference I suspect is that our friends may not be millionaires and so we therefore contribute towards their utility costs.

LizzieDrip Fri 27-Sept-24 11:44:01

They seem like very sensible suggestions to me. Look at the absence of balance in our media because most of it is owned by Murdoch’s News International - hardly ‘free press’ when it jumps to the tune of one paymaster.

Also, wasn’t a press regulator a recommendation of the Leveson Inquiry, so really should be implemented.

Dinahmo Fri 27-Sept-24 11:45:23

Sago

OldFrill

My goodness Sago - how low will you stoop to stir negativity. The chap did a very generous thing for his dying best friend, and was reimbursed.

He has not been reimbursed yet.
The original house needs to be sold once probate has been settled.

Your point is? Do you really think that he lent the apartment and expected to get something in return.

Methinks that you are trying too hard to knock the LP.

Dinahmo Fri 27-Sept-24 11:50:38

Anniebach

He worked for Maxwell publications, in 1988, aged 24year he moved to broadcasting. 1992 merged with Bob Geldof to form Planet 24 which was reported as extremely successful
So much, so young

Good for him. A bit like Richard Branson perhaps who started a magazine called Student in 1966, aged 16 and then started a mail order company selling records in 1970. The rest is history!

ronib Fri 27-Sept-24 11:51:09

I think Lord Alli is my preferred candidate to take over from Starmer - I could live with that.

eazybee Fri 27-Sept-24 11:51:57

The difference is, for all those with generous friends allowing use of their holiday homes, it is unlikely that the recipients are in a position to exert influence on their behalf.
Waheed Alli was made a peer at the age of 33, the youngest appointment at that time, previously he had been equally generous to the Labour Party, AKA Tony Blair. He had no time, nor money, for Jeremy Corbyn.

Dinahmo Fri 27-Sept-24 11:53:39

AGAA4

I just find it a bit sickening when large amounts of money are spent on those who are already well off while people are worrying about heating their homes and having enough to eat.
Lord Alli can be Father Christmas to MPs if he wants but is he entirely benign?

What does he have to gain? Influence perhaps in that the LP may listen to him. Isn't that what we all want? Our favoured political party to listen to us.

foxie48 Fri 27-Sept-24 12:01:27

Having read Hansard it seems Lord Alli was actually asking for the complete opposite of what Namsnanny was reporting. His speech is sensible and measured unlike some of the posts on this thread.

Dinahmo Fri 27-Sept-24 12:02:42

Namsnanny Just to say I object to you linking the Guardian with GB News and the Daily Mail. The Graun is not owned by wealthy, offshore individuals. It is owned by the Guardian Media Group which in turn has one shareholder - the Scott Trust.

The Trust was created in 1936 - "secure the financial and editorial independence of The Guardian in perpetuity and to safeguard the journalistic freedom and liberal values of The Guardian free from commercial or political interference".[6]

Cossy Fri 27-Sept-24 12:14:39

foxie48

Having read Hansard it seems Lord Alli was actually asking for the complete opposite of what Namsnanny was reporting. His speech is sensible and measured unlike some of the posts on this thread.

👏👏👏👏

Cossy Fri 27-Sept-24 12:15:08

Dinahmo

Namsnanny Just to say I object to you linking the Guardian with GB News and the Daily Mail. The Graun is not owned by wealthy, offshore individuals. It is owned by the Guardian Media Group which in turn has one shareholder - the Scott Trust.

The Trust was created in 1936 - "secure the financial and editorial independence of The Guardian in perpetuity and to safeguard the journalistic freedom and liberal values of The Guardian free from commercial or political interference".[6]

👏👏👏👏

eazybee Fri 27-Sept-24 12:18:08

Your quote refers to the paper of the time, The Manchester Guardian, published in Manchester sinc 1821.
It changed its name in 1959 to The Guardian, and moved to London.
The Manchester Guardian was an excellent newspaper. The Guardian is not.

Iam64 Fri 27-Sept-24 12:24:36

eazybee points out that Lord Ali supported Tony Blair but had ‘no time for Jeremy Corbyn’.
I’m one of many who supported Blair (other than Iraq) but left the LP because of Corbyn. I rejoined so I could vote in the leadership election. Yes I voted Starmer and have no regrets about that

Wyllow3 Fri 27-Sept-24 12:24:41

OldFrill

Yesterday 21:36Namsnanny

OldFrill

*He actually suggested, about ten years ago, that it might be beneficial to have a state run press regulator. He also suggested they should be a limit on the number of newspapers one company could own.
All this is now being regurgitated and twisted - not least, it seems, by Namsnanny*

^Thats just silly, you choosing to be using inflammatory language.
I'm just quoting and listening to others.^

*It's not silly he said he wanted a state press REGULATOR not a State Press 😉
Of course if it was an honest misinterpretation on your part it's odd you're still pursuing it.

The Levinson report specifically concerned itself with very moving report of the victims of some phone hacking and families of victims torn apart by press.

I've just completed the tedious job of sifting through the whole report in the HoL. No one suggests state regulation.

To be exact: this is what Alli actually said:

The first is that a free press, with all the rights and responsibilities that that entails, is essential

The second is the clear inadequacies of the PCC.

The third is the need for a genuinely independent and effective system of self-regulation for the press.

The fourth is the creation of a new body with teeth that promotes high standards of journalism and protects the rights of the individual.

Fifth is the importance of maintaining a plural media, particularly when it comes to sourcing news

The sixth is that the commercial pressures and ambitions of national newspapers should not be an excuse to lower standards or trample on citizens’ rights.

The seventh is that the relationships between senior politicians of all parties and the press should be much more transparent.

so what they were all discussing was the the choice between independent regulation versus self regulation.

The result of the Levenson report was to go for the
Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), chaired by Sir Alan Moses.

Dont know how well it functions

Wyllow3 Fri 27-Sept-24 12:27:17

(I was quoting not paraphrasing Alli's words above"

Anniebach Fri 27-Sept-24 13:00:31

Thank you Wyllow

NotSpaghetti Fri 27-Sept-24 13:51:15

foxie48

Having read Hansard it seems Lord Alli was actually asking for the complete opposite of what Namsnanny was reporting. His speech is sensible and measured unlike some of the posts on this thread.

Yes. I just read it.
Thanks for the link MaizieD

Wyllow3 Fri 27-Sept-24 13:57:35

Yes, should have said thank you Maisie for the opportunity.

Dinahmo Fri 27-Sept-24 14:46:07

eazybee

Your quote refers to the paper of the time, The Manchester Guardian, published in Manchester sinc 1821.
It changed its name in 1959 to The Guardian, and moved to London.
The Manchester Guardian was an excellent newspaper. The Guardian is not.

I am aware of its history and IMO it is still the best daily paper in England. You may not like some of its regular columnists but it does have regular features by people of other political persuasions.

eazybee Fri 27-Sept-24 14:55:51

Interesting to note the number of references to Waheed Alli in just this thread : referred to repeatedly as: a donor to the Labour party, donated over £500,000 over the past 20 years, labour donor for twenty years etc.
The cause of all the suspicion is that he has recently donated money to influential Labour members for specific purposes: parties, loans of the penthouse and American apartment, reading glasses and clothes, presented as office expenses.
Not for, more usefully: office space, folding machines, printers, posters, extra staff etc which most local election groups are desperate for, but instead unnecessary luxuries for his 'friends.' who could well afford to pay themselves.

That is what all the outrage is about, as there was when Boris was given money supposedly for ridiculously expensive wallpaper. Donations generally go towards the expenses of fighting elections, not for gifts to wealthy people, who are avidly seizing the perks they have accused other parties of enjoying.
Alli acquired a peerage for his support of Blair; I have no idea what he wants now, but there will be something. Perhaps it is just friend in high places. If he really cared for the Labour party he would have supported struggling members during the Corbyn era.

OldFrill Fri 27-Sept-24 17:29:13

Wyllow3 @ Today 12:23
The state press regulator suggestion was during a media interview