Gransnet forums

News & politics

What has Labour done in the first 100 days?

(432 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 06:07:39

A round-up - curtesy of the Guardian.

Economy
One of Rachel Reeves’s first actions as chancellor was to stand in front of the Commons and accuse the previous government of leaving a £22bn hole in this year’s public accounts. Every year, government spending diverges slightly from what was budgeted, but this was an unusually large amount, driven both by the higher-than-expected costs of housing asylum seekers and public sector pay deals.
Reeves’s solution to this was to put an immediate halt to various projects, including the road tunnel under Stonehenge and the A27 Arundel bypass. Boris Johnson’s promise to build 40 new hospitals has also been placed under review, with the prime minister, Keir Starmer, accusing his predecessor of making the promise without allocating the money.

Energy
When Michael Gove was asked at Tory conference to name the most effective Labour cabinet ministers so far, one of those he listed was Ed Miliband. The energy secretary has returned to a post he last held 14 years ago with a flurry of activity.
On 8 July, the first Monday after winning the election, Miliband announced he was removing the previous government’s de facto ban on onshore wind power. A day later, Reeves, unveiled the national wealth fund, a £7.3bn scheme designed to invest in green infrastructure such as clean steel and carbon capture.
Later that month, Miliband brought forward a bill to set up Great British Energy, a nationally owned energy production company that the government has put at the heart of its net zero strategy. The bill gives the company power to produce and distribute clean energy and spend money on energy efficiency schemes.
Keir Starmer announced in his Labour conference speech that GBE would be based in Aberdeen.

Transport
The first bill to pass the Commons under the Labour government was the rail nationalisation bill. The bill automatically brings rail networks back under public control once their existing franchise contract is over, or earlier if they breach their contracts.
The transport secretary, Louise Haigh, has also passed a bill to set up a new company called Great British Railways to manage both the track and the trains service. Some have questioned, however, why the rolling stock is not also being brought under national control.
Last month, Haigh reversed another piece of privatisation in the transport sector, allowing local authorities across England to run their own bus services once more. The transport secretary has also said she wants to make it simpler and easier for local leaders to conduct the franchising process.

Education
Labour has promised that it will introduce free breakfast clubs in every primary school in England, but it is starting slowly. Reeves announced at the Labour conference that 750 English schools would be invited to be part of a pilot programme.

Housing
Labour has promised to liberalise the planning regime and began soon after taking over government, not only overturning the restrictions on onshore wind power but also reimposing population-based housing targets on local authorities.
The Conservatives had given local planners a series of loopholes to avoid meeting those targets, in a move that housebuilders said had hampered new development, pushing housing approvals to a 10-year low.

Other reforms are planned, including making it easier for public bodies to issue compulsory purchasing orders and making it easier to build on green belt land.
Meanwhile, Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, has introduced a package of renters’ reforms, which passed their second reading in parliament this week, despite the objections of the Conservatives. That package picks up on some of the ambitions originally championed by Gove when he was housing secretary, including bringing an immediate end to no-fault evictions and forcing landlords to make timely repairs to properties.
Campaigners, however, are unhappy that the Labour government has so far not enacted another package of protections for leaseholders, whom they worry are slipping down the government’s agenda. The government has promised to bring in a bill to restrict leasehold and boost the rights of tenants, but has so far not even enacted the measures passed through parliament under the last government.

Employment
Starmer promised that his government would bring forward a package of workers’ rights in his first 100 days, a deadline which was just about met when Angela Rayner, his deputy, published the employment rights bill on Thursday.
Her reforms include giving workers protection from unfair dismissal and paternity leave rights from the first day of their employment, rather than having to wait two years. The bill also bans employers from forcing workers to sign zero-hours contracts and stops them firing staff only to hire them back on lower pay, unless the company is threatened with bankruptcy.
While the bill was published in the first 100 days it will take another two years for it to come into force. Officials and ministers will spend that time consulting businesses and trade unions about the exact measures involved and how to police them.
Some of the pre-election promises have not made it into the bill. There will be no statutory right for workers to switch off outside their working hours, and the government will now consult on having a single status of worker. Unions have long campaigned for a single worker status to replace the distinction between those who are employed and self-employed, in part to tackle exploitation in the gig economy.

Immigration
As promised, Labour has ended the previous government’s Rwanda scheme, which had not sent a single asylum seeker to Rwanda but was already costing the government money. Scrapping it saved more than £2bn over two years.
In its place, Starmer and his home secretary, Yvette Cooper, have introduced a border security command to focus on people-smuggling gangs. However, the prime minister is still trying to sign returns agreements with European countries, agreements that might mean Britain having to accept migrants in return.
Since the election, nearly 12,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats, slightly fewer than in the same period last year.
Justice
A week after the election, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced an early release scheme that would see some offenders who had committed less serious crimes leave prison after serving 40% of their sentence. Mahmood blamed the prisons crisis she inherited from the previous government, which had left jails in England and Wales almost entirely full.
The early release scheme was controversial, but its purpose was underlined later in the summer as riots engulfed parts of the country. Speaking to journalists from the Downing Street garden after the riots had subsided, the prime minister described the decisions he had had to make while they were unfolding.
“I shouldn’t be sitting in the Cobra room with a list of prison places across the country on a day-by-day basis, trying to work out how we deal with disorder,” he said. “But that’s the position I was put in.”

Health
If Starmer is to show progress in one public service by the time he goes into the next election, it will have to be the NHS. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, commissioned Ara Darzi, a former Labour minister, to outline the scale of the challenge. Lord Darzi’s report, which was published last month, found that long delays for hospital, GP and mental health services were leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths.
Darzi suggested a range of changes, including focusing more on prevention and making companies pay “health levies” for things such as alcohol and tobacco.

Whitewavemark2 Sun 20-Oct-24 11:20:33

Casdon

Whitewavemark2

This thread has completely lost its meaning, so I will no longer post on this.

I may start a new one in the hope posters who have a lot to say on a topic, have the grace to start a new thread that doesn’t entirely disrupt the existing one.

People keep throwing red herrings in, and it’s difficult not to respond, but please don’t give up on posting the facts about what is happening Whitewavemark2, a lot of us are finding it so useful. I wonder if you titled the thread ‘Information about Government Actions Only Please’ or something along those lines, would that keep us to the point?

Yes - I’ll try that. The point is people want to be able to voice an opinion about government policy - as do I - but when it becomes a topic in itself please do start another thread.

eazybee Sun 20-Oct-24 11:16:37

Please do not dismiss our musings as minimal, they are as relevant as the anyone else’s.

I do so agree, Granny Gravy. I am not fortunate enough to have grandchildren, but I appreciate fully what grandparents do, through the childcare my parents provided for my children when young, and which, at the time I took it entirely for granted.

Casdon Sun 20-Oct-24 11:09:38

Whitewavemark2

This thread has completely lost its meaning, so I will no longer post on this.

I may start a new one in the hope posters who have a lot to say on a topic, have the grace to start a new thread that doesn’t entirely disrupt the existing one.

People keep throwing red herrings in, and it’s difficult not to respond, but please don’t give up on posting the facts about what is happening Whitewavemark2, a lot of us are finding it so useful. I wonder if you titled the thread ‘Information about Government Actions Only Please’ or something along those lines, would that keep us to the point?

Casdon Sun 20-Oct-24 11:03:19

GrannyGravy13

I am well and truly in the thick of it

As a young Grandparent I have watched my four daughter in laws decide whether to work in their chosen pre child careers or stay at home. I have been a full time carer for my DD’s children since they were 9 months old and she returned to work. They went to pre-school at 31/2. I was the one that took them and picked them up, chatting to other grans and mums. I still pick up from school three/four times a week, along with child care cover over school holidays.

I have been their sounding board I am the one who picks up the childcare duties when things go wrong.

Please do not dismiss our musings as minimal, they are as relevant as the anyone else’s.

On an individual level I agree GrannyGravy, of course grandparents can be vital in supporting their grandchildren’s needs while the parents are at work, and that is very important, but at a societal level we aren't in the driving seat regarding the model of childcare, nor should we be. Regardless though, it’s not just a Labour government initiative to improve childcare against the wishes of parents, parents are the ones driving the agenda.

Allira Sun 20-Oct-24 10:26:00

Oreo

Don’t start twisting words and comments please Iam64
It’s only the last comment by Doodledog that’s spoiling the thread by claiming all kinds of nastiness which doesn’t exist.
Her other comments on early childcare are fine, just her own opinions on it which others can either agree or disagree on.
High time to put the subject to rest as it’s not the subject of the thread and has rambled on forever.
As for 1950’s approach to childcare, tho I’m probably years younger than many on here I would say if that means that Mums and babies and toddlers could be home together then bring it on.

And I'm probably older so there was no HRP when my older DC were young anyway.

We all have opinions on it and no-one should condemn another parent for the choices they made/make and which they feel were/are best for their family. Nor should women have been short-changed so many times over the years, leading to an impoverished old age either.

With the arrival of TAs in schools the rôle of parent-helper is not so important either but certainly there was Hobson's choice for childcare in those days as far as nursery provision etc despite what some may think.

"We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand" and thus it was then.

Whitewavemark2 Sun 20-Oct-24 10:17:04

This thread has completely lost its meaning, so I will no longer post on this.

I may start a new one in the hope posters who have a lot to say on a topic, have the grace to start a new thread that doesn’t entirely disrupt the existing one.

Allira Sun 20-Oct-24 10:14:49

GrannyGravy13

I will reserve any judgment on the budget until after I have listened to it.

Yes, no point, really, in speculation.

There's enough of that on TV and in the newspapers.

She might surprise us all 😀

Allira Sun 20-Oct-24 10:13:32

Iam64

Apologies - words ramble there
I meant to support Doodledog as I disagree with Oreo who suggests Doodle’s posts on sah/career/working mothers are ruining the thread
I’m surprised at the pre-occupation here with the idea that the 1950’s approach to family life was superior to todays

Most of us have not said that but it's sad that those who had the benefit of paid maternity leave and facilities where their children could be cared are resentful of those who, through various circumstances, are stay-at-home parents. It's not costing them anything.

GrannyGravy13 Sun 20-Oct-24 10:10:24

I will reserve any judgment on the budget until after I have listened to it.

Allira Sun 20-Oct-24 10:06:55

escaped

I did pick up a comment from some MP (??) about KM's suitability as PM due to family commitments.
He said,
"What gives me the concern is because I understand from talking to colleagues that Kemi spends a lot of time with her family", inferring she cannot do both jobs.
I don't like her much, but I understand she put him right.

It was Christopher Chope, father of two and past retirement age (77).

GrannyGravy13 Sun 20-Oct-24 10:04:05

I am well and truly in the thick of it

As a young Grandparent I have watched my four daughter in laws decide whether to work in their chosen pre child careers or stay at home. I have been a full time carer for my DD’s children since they were 9 months old and she returned to work. They went to pre-school at 31/2. I was the one that took them and picked them up, chatting to other grans and mums. I still pick up from school three/four times a week, along with child care cover over school holidays.

I have been their sounding board I am the one who picks up the childcare duties when things go wrong.

Please do not dismiss our musings as minimal, they are as relevant as the anyone else’s.

escaped Sun 20-Oct-24 10:03:47

Sorry, KM should read KB ..... Kemi Badenoch

Whitewavemark2 Sun 20-Oct-24 10:01:50

NI rise to be linked to funding the NHS

Rachel Reeves is set to use one of the most pivotal budgets of recent times to call on businesses to pay more tax to help restore the NHS, amid warnings that the health service has been left with a £9bn hole in its finances.
The chancellor is expected to stake her reputation on a tax-­raising budget designed as a reset of the public finances. She has already had to deal with cabinet skirmishes over funding unveiled alongside the statement. However, Reeves is understood to believe that the public will accept a multibillion-pound hike in business taxes if it is linked to repairing the health system’s finances.
The Observer has seen new research, commissioned in the run-up to the budget by an influential thinktank with close links to the Treasury and No 10, that suggests overwhelming support for using an increase in national insurance contributions (NICs) for employers to fund extra resources for the NHS.

Sources across Whitehall said Reeves was putting the NHS front and centre of what is shaping up to be one of the most consequential budgets of recent decades.

escaped Sun 20-Oct-24 10:01:38

I did pick up a comment from some MP (??) about KM's suitability as PM due to family commitments.
He said,
"What gives me the concern is because I understand from talking to colleagues that Kemi spends a lot of time with her family", inferring she cannot do both jobs.
I don't like her much, but I understand she put him right.

Mollygo Sun 20-Oct-24 10:01:32

Eazybee I share your frustration about separate parent consultations, even more so when I was once greeted with “you never told him that!” As if they’d discussed my report to the father, before the mother’s turn.
Regarding first 100 days, I’m waiting to see how the offer of free breakfasts for all primary children works out and is costed.

Casdon Sun 20-Oct-24 09:53:34

ronib

Casdon not musings. There’s ample information about social anxiety and depression in young children in the UK .

In what way does the government of the day not influence the real world? If government doesn’t push through social policies who does?

They are musings, when one’s ability to influence the current generation are minimal ronib. Whatever any research says, it’s only of impact when it resonates with the generation affected and they decide to act. This government are carrying on exactly as previous governments have done, in enabling working people to live their lives the way they want to. Your views are those of a conservative (small c) woman, but you must know that there are few who share them - of course, there are some on Gransnet, because as we get older our views become more conservative on average, and we want to turn the clock back to our own youth’s experiences, but it won’t, can’t, and shouldn’t happen because we are not in the thick of it now.

ronib Sun 20-Oct-24 09:51:51

eazybee I don’t know what can be done about feral attitudes of divorced parents to each other. The welfare of the child should be paramount but it’s not.
I completely understand your frustration about parent teacher consultation evenings. Perhaps one or both parents can’t own up to the problems divorce has caused their children? As in the reality.

eazybee Sun 20-Oct-24 09:44:34

Yes Ronib; the effect of divorce on children and families is not acknowledged nearly strongly enough. This is one of the reasons so many mothers have to work much earlier and longer than they anticipated; raising children on your own is exhausting, without the attendant guilt of feeling you are neglecting your children. Relationships between divorced and separated parents are so important, and I got tired of parents demanding separate appointments because they refused to sit together for ten minutes to discuss the problems their children were undergoing, partly due to their feral attitude to each other.

ronib Sun 20-Oct-24 09:40:44

Casdon not musings. There’s ample information about social anxiety and depression in young children in the UK .

In what way does the government of the day not influence the real world? If government doesn’t push through social policies who does?

Oreo Sun 20-Oct-24 09:35:12

Elderly?😲😁 Well, musings are what we do on a forum, but I agree it’s time to get back to Labour, what are they doing today anybody know?Just about to watch Trevor Phillips which I recorded so that and coffee and toast calls.

Casdon Sun 20-Oct-24 09:22:29

ronib I despair too, but because the musings of elderly people about how we would like to see young women now bring up their families does not have any relevance to how they live their lives, or how future generations will live theirs. Your most fervent wishes are not going to come to fruition, there is no point in pursuing this any further. This is not about Labour, this is about the real world.

ronib Sun 20-Oct-24 09:09:58

I am in quiet despair. Do you not understand that families in the 1950s were still processing the appalling effects of the Second World War? In fact studies suggest a much higher anxiety level and trust problems now than in the 1950s. There’s also a lack of social connectivity on divorce with more people living alone.
Labour seems more obsessed with the environment than the emotional needs of young families.

escaped Sun 20-Oct-24 09:05:28

I hope this discussion isn't going to turn into two camps of back-patting or of back-biting.

If someone likes a post with 👏 👏 👏 or a brief comment, thats fine, be grateful, and move on. It isn't a cue to then start complaining about other posters whose words one might have found insulting or dismissive. Just to garner support.

Neither approach to family life is superior, it's just different, and often personal choice.

If I had my way, I'd be more keen to take steps to recognise, and remunerate, the value of unpaid care work within the family in our society. And that goes for caring for all ages and all disabilities.

Oreo Sun 20-Oct-24 09:00:09

Don’t start twisting words and comments please Iam64
It’s only the last comment by Doodledog that’s spoiling the thread by claiming all kinds of nastiness which doesn’t exist.
Her other comments on early childcare are fine, just her own opinions on it which others can either agree or disagree on.
High time to put the subject to rest as it’s not the subject of the thread and has rambled on forever.
As for 1950’s approach to childcare, tho I’m probably years younger than many on here I would say if that means that Mums and babies and toddlers could be home together then bring it on.

Iam64 Sun 20-Oct-24 08:46:15

Apologies - words ramble there
I meant to support Doodledog as I disagree with Oreo who suggests Doodle’s posts on sah/career/working mothers are ruining the thread
I’m surprised at the pre-occupation here with the idea that the 1950’s approach to family life was superior to todays