Thankyou Smileless 
What colour car do you have or did you used to drive?
A drop in the ocean in the great schemes of things....but replicated by how many more
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Lidia Thorpe shouted about the odds for Aboriginal peoples, for the moment. Apparently, she has cultivated an attention seeking habit of all things Australian over the years. Silly woman. Me, me, me look at me!
Thankyou Smileless 
She looks about as aboriginal as Dame Edna....
She has Irish & English heritage too.
She is only part Aboriginal, which might explain why she feels she needs to be so such more extreme than those who have no settler heritage?
Iam64
GrannyGravy13
Galaxy
She is entitled to protest as are those who disagree with her.
Absolutely 👏👏👏
Another Absolutely. Indigenous people in Commonwealth countries are entitled to express their views. The king seems capable of reflection and seems to have a genuine interest in our countries history. I bet he took this in his stride.
I bet he did too.
Probably not fussed if Oz decided to cut loose.
It’s their call.
That said, how representative is this woman of the views of the population there? She lost her credibility somewhat with me when she told the King to Foxtrot Oscar.
Good post 00opsidia.
I don't just think a monarch deserves respect, I believe all humans do. While we cannot change the past, we can work together to make a better future.
Respectful, mature communication doesn't include shouting and waving arms in an angry way.
Whatever you think of the Monarchy, I don't think shouting angrily and aggressively in public is the right way to behave to anyone, whoever they are. If they have cancer, it's even worse. It always pays to Be KIND
Even if King Charles was responsible for the genocide, there would still be better ways of tackling the situation. I agree that she demeaned herself.
Lidia Thorpe is an elected politician and thus has more opportunity and a wider platform than most on which to express her concerns in parliament, and possibly convince others to do something about them. It was, I believe, a majority of Australian people who voted recently against giving increased political rights to indigenous people; they are the ones she needs to convince.
But so much easier to demean herself and her protest by bawling and shouting in the face of King Charles.
I think the King probably has a fair amount of sympathy with her views but, as ftm420 says, he can't say too much.
AGAA4
I think she was very 'effective'. Charles will understand that this isn't personal and is aimed at the monarch, whoever that is at the time, and will think about what she said.
Absolutely. Times change. The Queen visited Australia when children were being forced away from families into "Re-education" but wouldn't have been able to speak up.
The dignified welcome had its place but so does this. I don't think it overshadowed it.
I think she was very 'effective'. Charles will understand that this isn't personal and is aimed at the monarch, whoever that is at the time, and will think about what she said.
I can’t understand why anyone thinks these parasites are due RESPECT just because of the family they were born into….not to mention the hundreds of millions they cost EVERY year ,Time we got rid of them ,they are a medieval concept living ina modern world .
OldFrill
00opsidia
I don't know if she would have spoken to Queen Elizabeth like that...
As people we all need to take responsibility for how we treat others and shouting at someone in public in that way is not a respectful way to foster communication.I think she "fostered communication" very successfully, it's all over the media. Aim achieved.
Sadly, it is, and has completely overshadowed the dignified welcome by the traditional owners of the land.
00opsidia
I don't know if she would have spoken to Queen Elizabeth like that...
As people we all need to take responsibility for how we treat others and shouting at someone in public in that way is not a respectful way to foster communication.
I think she "fostered communication" very successfully, it's all over the media. Aim achieved.
I was generalising about the hard life / about the reasons why everyone ages differently and I wasn't criticising her looks, just explaining why I said she wasn't "young". I think she looks ok apart from looking angry. Everyone looks nicer when they don't look angry.
It would have been good to do things differently. She would do well to learn how to communicate in a more effective manner and manage her anger better.
Wyllow3
ftm420
Ferry23 I agree. The King welcomes freedom of speech and she is entitled to protest. He's used to it and quite likely he agrees with her sentiments, but can't say so in public anyway.
I agree, I think it quite likely he would.
There's a time and place for working 'through the system" and a time for what was peaceful but vocal protest.
peaceful
😁 I don't think Lidia has ever been peaceful!
ftm420
Ferry23 I agree. The King welcomes freedom of speech and she is entitled to protest. He's used to it and quite likely he agrees with her sentiments, but can't say so in public anyway.
I agree, I think it quite likely he would.
There's a time and place for working 'through the system" and a time for what was peaceful but vocal protest.
Well, she's 51 and looks ok for 51 but I don't think she's had a hard life, just a busy one like many women.
Silly yes, but young no.
Still, I thought Charles handled it well.
I did think she looks older or has lived a hard life, yes. (Because we all age differently and sometimes people look old before their time). People who have drunk a lot, smoked or done other aging things as well as those who have been through a lot can and often do look older. It wasn't meant as a judgement, but an observation, a truth.
I don't know anything about her lifestyle, but I was disagreeing with the description of "Silly young woman" in the title. As in, I wouldn't describe her as "young".
Message deleted by Gransnet as it quotes a deleted post. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.
00opsidia
I don't know if she would have spoken to Queen Elizabeth like that...
As people we all need to take responsibility for how we treat others and shouting at someone in public in that way is not a respectful way to foster communication.
Really
Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.
I don't know if she would have spoken to Queen Elizabeth like that...
As people we all need to take responsibility for how we treat others and shouting at someone in public in that way is not a respectful way to foster communication.
00opsidia
She's entitled to her views, but she's rude to shout like that at the King. She could have spoken another way, more politely or written a letter.
I'm not a Charle's fan and I am not anti the indigenous people. People do know they suffered, but no one can go back and change the past. All anyone can do is work together for a better future, but yelling and screaming abuse won't achieve that.
I disagree with her shouting at the king because he was not personally responsible for the problems in Australia, because he does have cancer and is a visitor in their country.
I did think she looked older, or has lived a hard life.
*I did think she looked older, or has lived a hard life’
So, not content to disagreeing with the way she expressed her concerns and beliefs, you make vague allegations about her presentation and life style
Unacceptable
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.