Dyson has been very successful: he's an example of someone coming in who is concerned about food production
But...... the "cost" of course is that once the land Dyson farms was occupied by small farmers and now its management and workers. Is that "all bad"? I hardly feel fit to judge, many of the jobs may be satisfying and rewarding?
Dyson:
"Dyson Farming made a pre-tax profit of £5.2m in the year to 31 December 2023, up by £527,000 on the previous year.
Sir James Dyson’s farming business also increased its turnover by 16% to total £40.6m, according to the company’s accounts, with arable farming continuing to be the principal business activity.
It classes itself as the UK’s largest farming business, covering 14,600ha of farmland across Lincolnshire, Oxfordshire, West Berkshire, Somerset and Gloucestershire.
The enterprise typically produces 40,000t of wheat, 9,000t of spring barley, 12,000t of potatoes, 29,000t of sugar beet and 1,250t of strawberries, alongside 2,000 sheep and 800 cattle.
I don't have the same regard for Clarkson - he did buy land for tax relief as he said himself in 2010 (tho later calling it "for shooting", and his "farming" is really hobby farming, people visit for the "Clarkson" experience.
and yes I do feel politicians are "piggy backing" on the IT issue but not addressing the real reasons farms are struggling.