Syrian asylum seeker arrested after boy, 14, killed and four injured in Austria stabbing.

JenniferEccles

Only a few days ago, J.D Vance warned of the dangers Europe faces if it continues with the madness of allowing uncontrolled mass migration.

It took an American to point out what voters across the continent have known for years, yet governments still steadfastly refused to take action.

We don’t have “mass uncontrolled immigration”

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

Message to Vance
clean up your own back yard before you go spouting off

There were more than 488 mass shootings in 2024

"There have been more than 488 mass shootings across the US so far in 2024, according to the Gun Violence Archive, external, which defines a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more people are injured or killed.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41488081

Here is an interesting chart showing terrorist related arrests between 2010 and 2019.

The vast majority were Hadist/religion inspired.

I should add this is Europe not just UK.

In terms of the Southport killings, he WAS British, he was also autistic, had mental health issues and obsessions with murder and genocide. He’d had issues since year 9 at his mainstream school and was moved to a special school, he was known to authorities.

According to neighbours in both Wales and Southport, the rest of his family were normal decent people who moved to Southport for the father’s work.

This could have been ANYONE, this young man was clearly mental very unwell and not properly or effectively monitored by either the authorities or his family. Absolutely not because his parents came from Rwanda.

Wyllow3

*Message to Vance*
clean up your own back yard before you go spouting off

There were more than 488 mass shootings in 2024

"There have been more than 488 mass shootings across the US so far in 2024, according to the Gun Violence Archive, external, which defines a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more people are injured or killed.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41488081

👏👏👏👏

I give no credence whatsoever to the rantings of the current US administration.

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

Woodenspoon

“ What drivel whether he was a lone wolf or a terrorist, he shouldn’t be in that country killing innocent people, going about their every day lives.”

Just out of interest, where should asylum seekers be?

I wholeheartedly agree that no one who poses a danger to life should be allowed to seek asylum, but many many don’t.

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

There needs to be stricter vetting to weed them out. Only if they assimilate, are no threat, work and are not a drain on any European country should they be allowed in. Otherwise, sorry, not our problem.

woodenspoon

Message deleted by GNHQ

You’d be surprised.

“ The data from the NPCC also included 9,980 Prevent referrals of people recorded as 'White', representing 60 percent of the total. By contrast, 81.7 percent of people in England and Wales described themselves as 'White' in the census.”

It’s not just those with black parents!

You are splitting hairs Wyllow. This individual, whether a lone wolf or a terrorist, was shown grinning after killing these poor people. Now, to you, it seems to make some sort of difference. An excuse maybe, some poor soul with mental issues. Isn’t that what we’re always told.
To the majority, there is outrage that once again one of these so called asylum seekers move to a European country and randomly kill its citizens.

Cossy

woodenspoon

Message deleted by GNHQ

You’d be surprised.

“ The data from the NPCC also included 9,980 Prevent referrals of people recorded as 'White', representing 60 percent of the total. By contrast, 81.7 percent of people in England and Wales described themselves as 'White' in the census.”

It’s not just those with black parents!

Did anybody say it was Cossy. Only you have mentioned that.

woodenspoon

There needs to be stricter vetting to weed them out. Only if they assimilate, are no threat, work and are not a drain on any European country should they be allowed in. Otherwise, sorry, not our problem.

Ok, I think most of us would agree with this.

So, given that you have to be in the country first, in which you wish to claim asylum and the law prevents them from working until leave to remain and right to work is granted. This process can take literally years.

How can we make this more effective and efficient? Because I agree with your basic points.

woodenspoon

My point, as I’m sure you realise, is that ANYONE, of any nationality/creed/colour/religion could have, and do, commit these terrible atrocities. Lots of white British people sadly become radicalised, especially disenfranchised young men.

woodenspoon

You are splitting hairs Wyllow. This individual, whether a lone wolf or a terrorist, was shown grinning after killing these poor people. Now, to you, it seems to make some sort of difference. An excuse maybe, some poor soul with mental issues. Isn’t that what we’re always told.
To the majority, there is outrage that once again one of these so called asylum seekers move to a European country and randomly kill its citizens.

No, that is not what we are always told. Far from it: if its terrorism, we are told, and the person prosecuted under the counter terrorism acts.

But in each case we have to wait for investigations as regarding the persons connections (or lack of), their online activities, whats in their home, what those who knew that person have said, before we can know the "why" .

There’s a saying: the devil makes work for idle hands. My view, contrary to what many on here say, is that if they’re genuine asylum seekers they need to be housed for six months only while they get their lives in order. After that, they work, no benefits, no nhs until they’ve proved themselves a model citizen, any criminality then back they go, immediately. It needs to be law and made crystal clear at the outset. No exceptions. No work, the. no benefits, no food bank, no housing., no nhs. If they can’t or won’t support themselves, and let’s face it anybody can do some sort of menial job if they want to, then back they go. No human rights lawyers preventing it from happening.
That way, we would soon whittle the numbers down to genuine claimants who want to settle and assimilate.

Just my opinion.

Forgot to add, of course asylum is big business for some here: support workers, interpreters, housing and legal advice, charities. Of course they want that gravy train to keep rolling on.

And now, I’m out for the rest of the day, so no more to add….

How do you suggest "back they go?" We have to have an agreement with the receiving country before planes are allowed to land

The USA faces the same issue right now: what they are doing atm is either to hold them in deportation camps at costs to taxpayer, or dumping some in Panama, who have agreed to take them.

This is another valid point about Vance "telling us what to do" - as if their deportation policy has actually worked, when its too early to see what will happen.

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Casdon I’m with you on the Southport murders. Those 3 sweet girls making friendship bracelets at a Taylor Swift themed day group at the start of their summer holidays were murdered by a psychotic individual. He’d been sectioned 3 times, improved on regular medication and released back into the community where he chose (for gods sake) not to take his meds. Longer lasting medication by injection was offered (probably bluddy cheaper option as always - less monitoring would be needed) but he declined them saying he “didn’t like needles”.

Our treatment of serious MH issues in this country is shameful. It’s expensive to treat. Living within communities should surely ONLY be possible with adequate safeguarding in place otherwise these individuals are a walking time bomb.

His family knew he was a risk. His parents grew up in Rwanda. Terrible atrocities there. The parents are now in hiding, have been given new identities. Probably don’t even live in Wales anymore.

But my point of this thread still stands. These attacks in Europe are becoming more frequent. And never mind Wyllow3 what the mealy mouthed Austrian politician said - the Austrian Police had already told the press there were links to Islamist radicalisation on line.

We need to acknowledge this. Face facts. Stop hand wringing and laying flowers whilst swaying with phone lights and candles at the scenes of devastation.

I think public opinion is hardening. The craven politicians who encouraged all this migration from countries with values different to us in Europe have put us all at risk. Where is safe? Wrong place, wrong time if unlucky. Best stay away from crowds of people. Christmas markets without adequate barrier protection for example? We are sitting ducks, sadly.

So do I 💯 I worry about my grandchildren’s generation- me I am glad I am on my way out & not on my way in 😔

woodenspoon

There’s a saying: the devil makes work for idle hands. My view, contrary to what many on here say, is that if they’re genuine asylum seekers they need to be housed for six months only while they get their lives in order. After that, they work, no benefits, no nhs until they’ve proved themselves a model citizen, any criminality then back they go, immediately. It needs to be law and made crystal clear at the outset. No exceptions. No work, the. no benefits, no food bank, no housing., no nhs. If they can’t or won’t support themselves, and let’s face it anybody can do some sort of menial job if they want to, then back they go. No human rights lawyers preventing it from happening.
That way, we would soon whittle the numbers down to genuine claimants who want to settle and assimilate.

Just my opinion.

They are not allowed to work, by law, until their claim to asylum is processed, they are not entitled to mainstream benefits, until their claim is processed.

It’s not them who don’t wish to work, it’s our abysmal slow, ineffective system and our laws which prevent them working.

woodenspoon

Forgot to add, of course asylum is big business for some here: support workers, interpreters, housing and legal advice, charities. Of course they want that gravy train to keep rolling on.

Have to dispute this!

We have nowhere near enough money nor staff in any of the above, so a huge decrease in numbers would make their jobs so much easier.