Gransnet forums

News & politics

Kowtowing to Trump

(193 Posts)
madeleine45 Fri 28-Feb-25 08:24:11

How cringemaking to see Starmer having to smarm up to Trump. He has earned his money for sure. When foreign policy is decided by what you can give a selfcentred misogynist, who acts like a two year old in a temper tantrum. Still Starmer had the best toy. He could wave an invitation to see the king. Trump couldnt miss that chance could he?

As for "helping" other countries, since when does it count as help if you are then asked to pay for it with anything this greedy lot think they should have.?

Excuse me while I go and be sick.

Ilovecheese Fri 28-Feb-25 11:02:21

Any trade deal we have will be to Trump's advantage. Our armed forces will be put in danger to protect Trump's mineral rights. Starmer didn't have much choice as we are in such a weak position but it was still cringeworthy.

Visgir1 Fri 28-Feb-25 11:01:39

I'm not a Fan of Starmer but his team got this right for him. Years of being a Lawyer put to good use, he knew not to, as the Times said this morning "Poke the Bear" pulling an invite out from of the hat, from the King master stroke.

J52 Fri 28-Feb-25 10:58:15

Throughout his legal career, I’m sure Keir Starmer has had to defend criminals in court when he knew there was a strong chance that they were guilty. All part of the training.
Perfect diplomacy.

Calendargirl Fri 28-Feb-25 10:52:08

All those on GN who moan about the monarchy will have to admit, it’s the main ‘trump’ card we hold.

Charles’ handwritten invite was a master stroke.

👑

NotSpaghetti Fri 28-Feb-25 10:49:13

And yes. He did well with Vance too. Polite but firm.

NotSpaghetti Fri 28-Feb-25 10:48:10

25Avalon - I did wonder if the invite may have actually been suggested by the king - after all, he takes a keen interest in world affairs and knows how valuable this sort of nonsense can be.

I would guess that Starmer and the king get along pretty well to be honest and whoever suggested it it did work like a charm... I bet Starmer had practiced taking it out of his pocket!

I'm sure Starmer did a fair bit of teeth gritting grin in order to get results. Good for him.

LizzieDrip Fri 28-Feb-25 10:47:09

Trump is so unpredictable; if KS had put a foot wrong and offended him at any point in the proceedings, Trump may well have called a halt to the whole thing - mid press conference / mid lunch, mid whatever. I wouldn’t put it past Trump to do that.

Just imagine being under such intense scrutiny and pressure, with all the nay sayers back in the UK looking on, just willing you to c**k it up!

Cossy Fri 28-Feb-25 10:47:06

Jaberwok

Absolutely not. The state visit is our trump card, it is the one thing that will prevent D.T from causing us too much grief, hopefully! The thought of that visit being tarnished by political disagreements will not sit well with D.T, and therefore act as a sort of political brake. To leave the invitation till later, would look exactly what it would have been, a reward. No invitation? a punishment. The King and Queen will be well up for this, after all, it's part of their job to smooth difficult diplomatic paths, exactly as Prince William did in Paris.

🙏👏👏👏👏

AGAA4 Fri 28-Feb-25 10:42:10

Well done to Keir Starmer. He had no choice but to be charming to Trump to get what he wanted for the UK but he stood up to Vance when the freedom of speech topic came up saying the UK has had free speech for a very long time and always will.

I'm sure Mr Starmer will need a detox when he gets back to the UK after having to be nice to Trump.

Witzend Fri 28-Feb-25 10:30:07

Agreed, Wyllow3.
Exactly how do the critics think KS should have behaved? Refused to go at all? Refused to shake hands and called him an orange-faced megalomaniac?

Mollygo Fri 28-Feb-25 10:24:05

fancythat
I watched him say it last night.

fancythat Fri 28-Feb-25 10:22:43

Mollygo

Barleyfields

Of course Trump wanted his State visit. He’s a shallow narcissist. We knew an invitation would be forthcoming so there’s no brownie points for Starmer in that. It remains to be seen how Trump will treat the UK after he’s had his ego stroked with pomp and pageantry. He wouldn’t queer his pitch before that. I wouldn’t trust him an inch.

You only have to listen to Trump’s “did I say that?” to know that anything he says is not to be trusted.

I only what and read snippets of things, in compared to some.

When I have heard Trump say that, I had assumed that he meant he hadnt said whatever it was.

And it was the media or journalists who had got things wrong.

Parsley3 Fri 28-Feb-25 10:21:07

I was cringing when I watched and listened to it, especially the handing over of the invitation but needs must, I think. Unfortunately, Starmer is not dealing with an honourable man and Trump could be posting criticism of the PM on his social media platform as we speak. I was more concerned with Trump denying that he has called Zelensky a dictator. Does he not remember what he has written?

fancythat Fri 28-Feb-25 10:20:59

Europe will become independent of the US regarding defence,

I think they are so far off that, that it is quite alarming.

And at what time scale?

Mollygo Fri 28-Feb-25 10:19:28

Barleyfields

Of course Trump wanted his State visit. He’s a shallow narcissist. We knew an invitation would be forthcoming so there’s no brownie points for Starmer in that. It remains to be seen how Trump will treat the UK after he’s had his ego stroked with pomp and pageantry. He wouldn’t queer his pitch before that. I wouldn’t trust him an inch.

You only have to listen to Trump’s “did I say that?” to know that anything he says is not to be trusted.

pascal30 Fri 28-Feb-25 10:18:48

I think Starmer is doing a good job, he even managed a Macron arm touch with Trump.. All credit to him for remaining pleasant and diplomatic..

Jaberwok Fri 28-Feb-25 10:17:09

Absolutely not. The state visit is our trump card, it is the one thing that will prevent D.T from causing us too much grief, hopefully! The thought of that visit being tarnished by political disagreements will not sit well with D.T, and therefore act as a sort of political brake. To leave the invitation till later, would look exactly what it would have been, a reward. No invitation? a punishment. The King and Queen will be well up for this, after all, it's part of their job to smooth difficult diplomatic paths, exactly as Prince William did in Paris.

Casdon Fri 28-Feb-25 10:10:58

Well done that King! Keeping Trump away from showboating opportunities in London is a good plan.

Whitewavemark2 Fri 28-Feb-25 10:07:44

King!

Whitewavemark2 Fri 28-Feb-25 10:07:34

Casdon

According to BBC News
‘Balmoral is only about 58 miles (93km) from the Trump International golf resort in Menie, where he is due to open a new course named after his mother this summer.‘
Not a coincidence I would guess.

No - the Kibg mentioned it in his letter

Casdon Fri 28-Feb-25 10:04:28

According to BBC News
‘Balmoral is only about 58 miles (93km) from the Trump International golf resort in Menie, where he is due to open a new course named after his mother this summer.‘
Not a coincidence I would guess.

Whitewavemark2 Fri 28-Feb-25 10:02:22

So looking to the future, and in an ideal world.

Europe will become independent of the US regarding defence, and as a one of the worlds largest economic blocks, Trump will not be able to push Europe around.

Win-win. (We just need to re-join the block)

Boz Fri 28-Feb-25 10:01:37

Why do people assume World Leaders hate Trump? You don't stroke the arm of a man whose words 'stick in your craw'; or collapse in giggles (Macron). I suggest they know things we don't or maybe just good diplomacy.
Balmoral is brilliant choice of venue. Far from the 'maddened crowd' for a start.

winterwhite Fri 28-Feb-25 10:00:47

I thought the wretched state visit was offered too soon. Wld have been better to hum and hah or not mention it until peace had been secured in Ukraine on reasonable terms. It’s the one thing Trump wants. Our trump card, Ho Ho, and we could have held it back for a bit.

Eloethan Fri 28-Feb-25 09:57:19

I found it nauseating too, but what choice did he have? I feel pretty sure that, had he been argumentative or asked obviously difficult questions, the UK would have paid the price. And then, of course, all Starmer's detractors would have torn him to pieces.

Trump is a bully but when he has so much power it is very difficult to openly confront him.