Gransnet forums

News & politics

New Leaders of the Free World

(101 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 10:00:55

Now has to be Europe.

Trump has totally abrogated that leadership as a result of aligning himself with Putin.

It must begin to be constructed this weekend at the summit called by Starmer.

MaizieD Sat 01-Mar-25 10:05:46

I'm always curious as to what exactly is the 'Free World*?

Free of what?

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 10:10:21

Authoritarianism - free democratic vote?

ronib Sat 01-Mar-25 10:10:24

Communism

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Sat 01-Mar-25 10:12:05

‘Talking Heads’ at a European summit. A load of hot air and warm words. The member states will agree on much that doesn’t cost money. Every country is in a parlous financial situation post Covid. Economies have flat lined.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 10:13:13

FriedGreenTomatoes2

‘Talking Heads’ at a European summit. A load of hot air and warm words. The member states will agree on much that doesn’t cost money. Every country is in a parlous financial situation post Covid. Economies have flat lined.

Are you in touch with Putin?

MaizieD Sat 01-Mar-25 10:15:08

ronib

Communism

For once, I think you're pretty near the mark there, ronib. It's certainly been a driving force for the US and we've had to tag along in its wake...

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 10:23:37

MaizieD

ronib

Communism

For once, I think you're pretty near the mark there, ronib. It's certainly been a driving force for the US and we've had to tag along in its wake...

I think that is a bit simplistic maizie

You have to look at how the relationship has developed historically, and how U.K. and Europe have been willing partners in the defence against threat using the vehicle NATO as the umbrella.

I doubt very much that Trump would now be prepared to defend NATO members in Easter Europe.

fancythat Sat 01-Mar-25 10:33:35

Nice idea.

Cant see it happening. Sadly.

Like I wrote on another thread, 27 countries are unlikely to agree on which brand of coffee to serve at their meetings.

I keep thinking of putting 27 of my relatives, or anyone's relatives in a room.
They wouldnt even all agree on what music to play.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 10:36:26

But NATO has held up, and the point is that this can continue in some form with European leadership without the USA.

fancythat Sat 01-Mar-25 10:42:59

Still is

^NATO - Homepage

NATO - Homepage
www.nato.int
NATO is a political and military alliance of countries from Europe and North America. Its members are committed to protecting each other from any threat.
^

hmm

fancythat Sat 01-Mar-25 10:43:47

It held up, with the US.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 10:54:10

fancythat

It held up, with the US.

Yes, but no longer. Trump will never defend Eastern Europe or even Western Europe in the event of attack by Putin.

I do think that we have time, as Putin’s army is on its knees and the Russian economy is really struggling.

So over the next perhaps a couple of years to get our defences first independent of USA , and built to the extent that we can feel sufficiently confident of our abilities to defend our way of life.

I

Lathyrus3 Sat 01-Mar-25 11:07:44

I was with a bunch of Americans a couple of weeks ago from several different states.

The two things they were (pretty much) in agreement with was that Trump was a disaster but also that Europe had to grow up, learn to work as a whole and stop relying the US for defence.

fancythat Sat 01-Mar-25 11:18:50

If the US withdraws, might Canada withdraw?

I stand corrected, as in there are 32 countries in Nato, not 27.

MaizieD Sat 01-Mar-25 11:21:44

You have to look at how the relationship has developed historically, and how U.K. and Europe have been willing partners in the defence against threat using the vehicle NATO as the umbrella

What was the 'threat' NATO was defending against post Glasnost, Wwmk2? The Soviet Union broke up. It's only since Putin that there has been a 'threat from Putin which h NATO hasn't done much to counter. Who cared about Georgia, for instance? Or Putin occupying Crimea?

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 11:22:08

I very much doubt that Canada would withdraw, particularly in light of Trumps recent nonsense.

MaizieD Sat 01-Mar-25 11:23:08

NATO has been powerless to contain dictators...

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 11:25:50

maizie as far as I am aware, Russia has never attacked a NATO country, almost certainly as a result of the mutual destruction threat - look at Cuba.

That is why Trumps behaviour is so destabilising, and causing a vacuum which must somehow be filled if we are to get back to some form of balance.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 11:27:44

MaizieD

NATO has been powerless to contain dictators...

NATO is a defence instrument, not a political one.

But it does stand to defend what has been seen as liberal democracies since WWII

fancythat Sat 01-Mar-25 11:27:50

According to this BBC link, NATO leaders are due to meet in June!

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18023383

Cossy Sat 01-Mar-25 11:28:23

fancythat

If the US withdraws, might Canada withdraw?

I stand corrected, as in there are 32 countries in Nato, not 27.

I very much doubt Canada would pull out, especially since Trump “wants Canada” for his own!

Greyduster Sat 01-Mar-25 11:28:32

If the US withdraws from NATO, it will be the death knell of NATO and Trump knows it. You have to have served on a NATO base to appreciate what a huge hand on the tiller the Americans have; that’s before you take into account their financial commitment. The idea of a European Army may be closer than we think but that comes with a whole lot of baggage and a bigger financial commitment than any of the potential member nations - us included - are willing or able to stump up.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 01-Mar-25 11:31:02

I think that the question or reality is that we have no choice.

Wyllow3 Sat 01-Mar-25 11:36:35

It's not just all about defence. What's sad is that it was for a very long time also an understanding that there's been shared culture, participation as democracies in the world order.

It's become clear not just last night, but with Vance's attacks on Europe (unless they were the European far right parties) that the US's intention is now to try and fragment and dominate Europe.

There is of course no way we'd get 27 countries to agree on everything, this is not at all the point, its going to be a slow process but worth the building.