M0nica
Well, many people have always considered Russell Brand to be an unpleasant man and remember his bullying on air phone call to Andrew Sachs.
Those who admire him, seem to admire him because he is unpleasant and nasty - there is no accounting for taste -
I have consistently arged that he is innocent until proven guilty and that he will get a fair trial with the evidence fairly considered by a jury of 12 people, drawn randomly from the voting register, who will be instructed clearly by the judge. There may be differences within the jury room, but at the end of the day 12 people from different backgrounds with different prejudices will reach a conclusion.
Can you suggest a better way of getting a fair verdict?
Yep I can. But this is neither the right forum or the right people to have that discussion.
