grannimimi
It’s important to compare like with like on legal migration. The figures were inflated by the Ukrainian scheme and the HongKong scheme and to a lesser extent the scheme for Afghanistan. It has now transpired that there are a number of agencies set up to recruit for low paid jobs overseas and colleges recruiting overseas students to facilitate immigration of one person who can then bring multiple, usually dependant family members. Apparently there are 100000 recruited overseas workers for whom jobs promised do not currently exist. There are also a number of fake colleges where students are registered but don’t attend or get qualifications. There’s also an ongoing recruitment problem in social care as it’s used as a ‘stepping stone’ to immigrate then people quite rationally move on if they can to better paying jobs. The government is now attempting to address these loopholes. It is not clear how many boat or lorry arrivals were returned prior to Brexit but the EU member Republic of Ireland which now has 20% overseas born has more asylum seekers than the UK and they are not returned to France. EU members are required to take quotas of asylum seekers and the figure of 100000 annually for the UK has been mentioned. Non compliance eg by Poland and Hungary is punished by withdrawal of funds. The EU are trying to offshore processing to third countries. The question has not been answered as to why France and other EU countries do not get sued when refugees have to live in tents whereas the UK provides hotel accommodation and social housing soon to be extended to subsidised private rented housing including to single young men who if born in the UK would not be a priority need for such housing. It is also easier to work illegally under the radar for lower than market rate wages in the UK. A clear draw for asylum seekers. The overall bill for the provision of free housing, health care and living costs would be enough and more to provide housing for those on waiting list and the homeless sleeping on the streets if invested in that way. Since we are not under the auspices of the EU the Government can create their own solutions where possible. If unchecked and unmanaged the lack of the necessary infrastructure will lead to a severe detriment on all concerned. Those living in leafy protected enclaves who can afford to mitigate the effects could consider checking their privilege before virtue signalling and denigrating those whose life experiences are negatively impacted when they express that.
Too difficult to read without paragraphs.
