Gransnet forums

News & politics

This Government

(98 Posts)
gillsterry Sat 23-Aug-25 13:55:29

I am now 87 years old and and i have seen many changes to this country , the labor party was at one time for the working people , they looked after the elderly and lower paid workers but things have changed ,they are hitting hard the people who cannot afford to buy new electric cars and have to rely on used cars but now they are going to raise the tax on older vehicles while the rich who can afford the new get off lightly , and what about the pensioners who have payed tax all their working lives have to pay tax on their pensions when are they going to hit their rich friends

ronib Sat 23-Aug-25 19:34:22

Yes it is the fault of RR - she is making it very expensive for employers to pay national insurance taxes on staff. An extra 15 per cent? ilovecheese unfortunately!

Keenie25 Sat 23-Aug-25 19:43:42

The aim of that is so they can cut costs probably due to NI hikes , thats down to Reeves

LizzieDrip Sat 23-Aug-25 19:47:47

So ronib, you believe that supermarkets are installing more & more self service tills because of the slightly higher NI tax?

Rubbish! It’s because supermarkets are profiteering - they are greedy bas*****.

ronib Sat 23-Aug-25 19:54:19

15 per cent NIC …. Who are the greedy bas!!!!! ?

Mt61 Sat 23-Aug-25 20:00:21

Babs03

@Mt61 No RR put stamp duty up in April this year, was an almighty rush for house buyers to get things rubber stamped before this date and now the property slump is the worst in ten years people are having to drop house prices ti what they bought it for if they bought it within the past decade.
RR has single-handedly destroyed the property market.

Oh ok babs03 👍🏻

LizzieDrip Sat 23-Aug-25 20:16:17

ronib

15 per cent NIC …. Who are the greedy bas!!!!! ?

Increased NI tax contributes to public services for the benefit of all UK citizens.

“UK supermarkets are posting substantial profits, with Tesco reporting £2.3 billion in pre-tax profits for the year ending February 2024 and Sainsbury's exceeding £1 billion in annual profits, reflecting both increased sales and strategic price.”

Tesco’s profit represents an increase of 160% on the previous year.

It’s up to you who you think is the greedy bas****!

ronib Sat 23-Aug-25 20:35:06

Good for the taxman then - presumably the supermarkets pay tax on profits? LizzieD. But just remember that small to medium businesses won’t be raking in that level of profits and many apprenticeships and entry level positions will be cut back. Ok?

Furret Sat 23-Aug-25 22:45:12

As a lifelong socialist I am disgusted and disappointed at our Labour government. I did see this coming - the lack of good leadership when Starmer excluded the likes of Corbyn and Abbott. It’s a weak man, a poor leader and manager who cannot work with those who hold disparate views.

Allira Sat 23-Aug-25 23:05:40

LizzieDrip

^Sanctioning people for small errors such as you describe has been going on for long before this government came to power^

Well, of course, MaizieD.

But it’s only an outrage now because we have a Labour government.

I’ve got used to the Labour bashing. It’s boring🥱

But they're not Labour are they, if they're protecting the wealthy and penalising people like the man GrannyGravy mentioned. Just because it has happened with successive governments doesn't make it right and we should be able to trust a Labour government to put right injustices against the poor and vulnerable.

They are frightened of tackling the wealthy who keep them in power so target everyone else.

I am hugely disappointed in them, particularly Reeves.

Allira Sat 23-Aug-25 23:11:08

MaizieD

^Labour used to be for the working classes and the Conservatives were for the better off who owned their own homes, drove cars and often employed staff to cook and clean for them.^

Who voted for Thatcher in 1979, then? Because the 'working class' has by far outnumbered the middle class for many years so a lot must have changed sides.... Thatcher who promptly increased 1 million unemployed to 3 million unemployed and destroyed heavy industry...

And who voted for Cameron in 2010, whose chancellor promptly put loads of them out of work?

Since 1945 tories have been in government for 52 years; Labour for 28 (not including the current government. Not a lot of working class solidarity for Labour in that record...

The Conservatives won in 1979 because of the sheer and absolute incompetence of the Labour Government led by nice but hopeless James Callaghan.

Teazel2 Sat 23-Aug-25 23:27:42

LizzieDrip

ronib

15 per cent NIC …. Who are the greedy bas!!!!! ?

Increased NI tax contributes to public services for the benefit of all UK citizens.

“UK supermarkets are posting substantial profits, with Tesco reporting £2.3 billion in pre-tax profits for the year ending February 2024 and Sainsbury's exceeding £1 billion in annual profits, reflecting both increased sales and strategic price.”

Tesco’s profit represents an increase of 160% on the previous year.

It’s up to you who you think is the greedy bas****!

You really think the increased N.I contributions will improve public services? 🤣🤣🤣

mum2three Sun 24-Aug-25 07:19:38

I'm delighted with this thread. So many people on here thought that the Labour party were the answer to all this country's problems. Now you know differently.
I'm not sure what their ultimate aim is, but they are certainly not working for the benefit of this country.

MaizieD Sun 24-Aug-25 07:56:24

The Conservatives won in 1979 because of the sheer and absolute incompetence of the Labour Government led by nice but hopeless James Callaghan.

I think that’s a moot point, Allira. It certainly opened us up to something much worse.

growstuff Sun 24-Aug-25 08:12:55

mum2three

I'm delighted with this thread. So many people on here thought that the Labour party were the answer to all this country's problems. Now you know differently.
I'm not sure what their ultimate aim is, but they are certainly not working for the benefit of this country.

I'm having a memory fail. I don't remember many people on GN thinking that the Labour Party was the answer to all the country's problems. My memory tells me that people voted the best of a bad lot (and sometimes tactically).

Furret Sun 24-Aug-25 08:29:11

mum2three

I'm delighted with this thread. So many people on here thought that the Labour party were the answer to all this country's problems. Now you know differently.
I'm not sure what their ultimate aim is, but they are certainly not working for the benefit of this country.

Not at all. We were just desperate for ANYTHING BUT THE TORIES.
The real problem isn’t Labour it’s Starmer.

ronib Sun 24-Aug-25 08:48:04

Not forgetting Rachel Reeves?
Yvette Cooper seems a bit out of her depth as Home Secretary. Always looks tired these days.
Wes Streeting seems quite good…and as for Angela Rayner…. Seems to be over promising and under delivering? 1.5 million houses by the end of this Parliament. The desire to demote the middle classes is getting a momentum.

eazybee Sun 24-Aug-25 09:23:30

Those with above average wealth need to more tax too many are squirreling it away in property and pensions instead of spending it in the economy.

Perhaps you might like to advise the unlovely Angela who has acquired an £800,000 apartment in Brighton in addition to her £650,000 constituency home, as well as her grace and favour flat at Admiralty flat. It is at present unclear which is her main home for which she is entitled to claim council tax relief and she is apparently reluctant to say.
All on a salary of £150, 000.
How does she do it?

eazybee Sun 24-Aug-25 11:03:48

Not at all. We were just desperate for ANYTHING BUT THE TORIES.
The real problem isn’t Labour it’s Starmer.

No. The real problem is those who voted exactly as you say, anything but the Tories, without looking at the credentials of those they voted for, or those simply did not bother to vote at all.

The same thing will happen should there be a General Election. People will vote for Reform without even setting eyes on their local representative, and then discover they are totally unable to deliver their impractical promises because it is all Farage telling voters what he thinks they want to hear.

Starmer promised endless solutions when he was in opposition, while consistently voting against measures the Tories were trying to introduce to reduce migration. Now he is experiencing just how difficult it is to get his plans through, in his case due to opposition from his own backbenchers.

Oreo Sun 24-Aug-25 12:09:08

I can’t argue with any of that Eazybee and I’m one of those who voted for them.
Unless things change over the next couple of years I will be politically homeless.

GrannyGravy13 Sun 24-Aug-25 12:16:01

Oreo

I can’t argue with any of that Eazybee and I’m one of those who voted for them.
Unless things change over the next couple of years I will be politically homeless.

Join the gang 🤦‍♀️

Mt61 Sun 24-Aug-25 12:36:30

My now dead MIL, would be spinning in her grave. Staunch labour woman, who canvassed for the Labour Party when it was a proper Labour Party for the working classes. I think today she would have voted Reform for sure.. I know as I use to tell her off for not being very PC.

Grantanow Sun 24-Aug-25 12:54:01

Labour's problem has been that the industrial working classes has been falling in number since the 1920s and thus reducing the reliable Labour vote. The present position is that Labour relies more on unionised public sector workers and part of the middle classes which it cannot afford to alienate. The rise of populist politicians like Mrs T who attract an emotionally driven and patriotic level of support from the same classes also reduces the Labour vote, as does nibbling by parties like the Greens. It's all more complicated than it was early in the 20th century.

Calendargirl Sun 24-Aug-25 13:01:07

Yvette Cooper seems a bit out of her depth as Home Secretary

Yes indeed, as does Rachel Reeves as Chancellor.

Both finding ‘doing the actual job’ much tougher than spouting off about it when you are safely in Opposition.

Casdon Sun 24-Aug-25 13:13:59

I agree regarding Rachel Reeves, I don’t agree regarding Yvette Cooper. She isn’t inexperienced, she has held senior ministerial roles before, nor is she out of her depth, she is tackling an extremely difficult portfolio methodically. If you look at the number of changes she has made in just a year, she has moved a lot of intransigent issues forward. Before anybody says ‘but she hasn’t stopped the boats’ let’s get real about what a huge issue that is, and look at what she has done so far. I think her only ‘problem’ is that she isn’t a publicity seeker, she just gets on with her job. That is now a foreign concept in British politics unfortunately, we seem to have moved to the biggest mouths being heard regardless of their competence or track record.

fancythat Sun 24-Aug-25 14:23:54

GrannyGravy13

Yes, Sir Starmer appears to be out to get the middle classes, the SME owners, along with those who have saved for their retirements. We are easy targets, they know were we are, they see what tax we pay (both business and personal) and will probably squeeze us until we squeak.

I never thought a Labour government would be frightened to go after the mega rich, they are leaving the big boys alone just like the Conservatives.

Is it frightened, or is it a whole load of other things?

Lawyers get in the way, big time[ironic given Starmer being who he is or was].

Money. As I have said several times before, there are a whole lot of organisations, largely worldwide, who outrank country governments.
Which I dont think many people re even aware of that exist.

Then there is, who knows what about who[m].
Many skeletons in many cupboards.
That will make a difference too.