Doodledog
icanhandthemback
Witzend
The law company/conveyancers she used, said IIRC that they were not qualified to give the sort of specific advice she needed, and they were being made scapegoats.
The conveyancers can only act on the information given to them by the client. If the client misleads them, by design or by accident, they cannot give the correct advice.
Is that an accusation? Heavens, they are coming thick and fast, aren't they? There may have been no 'misleading', simply a misunderstanding of the law. If the company is not qualified they should have said that the case was beyond their remit and referred her to a more specialist company. I'm sure all concerned wish they had done so.
No, it isn't an accusation, it is a fact. Your conveyancer is not a mind reader so unless you tell them what your circumstances are, they cannot advise you correctly. Some people don't give the information because they don't realise that it is relevant which I suspect is what has happened to AR and others do it by design because they don't want to pay the relevant duty.
From experience, conveyancers ask if you have any other property. If you don't think you have because it is in "Trust" then you would probably say, "No." because you don't consider you have. At that point, you don't answer other questions and the Conveyancer calculates the tax. If you say, "Yes." you get asked more questions so your conveyancer can work out whether there is additional tax to pay. At no point did I accuse AR of anything.