Cabinet Reshuffle

Primrose53

I heard Dr Sarah Jarvis on Radio 2 today talking about people damaged from covid jabs. When covid started, She initially told listeners and viewers that she did not approve of the jabs . She was then taken off air I believe. Some time later she was back on air again day after day, week in, week out and no doubt earning a fortune, telling everyone to get jabbed.

Today she is giving all the facts and figures on people damaged by the jabs.

This is what she was saying in 2021:

www.facebook.com/watch/?v=628147571533495

In this video, she's talking about young people and explains the risks and benefits. She is very clear that she would recommend vaccination for this group.

Casdon thanks for the info, having checked Sarah Jarvis out I couldn't understand why she might be against the Covid vaccine, it just didn't fit with what she has been involved in,

Haven’t you heard of vaccine damage? growstuff

ronib

My eldest child had a severe reaction when one year old and my gp advised against a booster jab and also not to vaccinate my other children. They were fine.
Maybee70

Your child was fine because the vast majority of children are vaccinated, so infections aren't out there to be caught. Have you not heard of herd immunity?

Iam64

Are you suggesting some kind of conspiracy theory here?

I’ve just scanned various reports of her interviews from the pandemic to present day. My impression is she was giving information based on her knowledge and experience at various different times. Isn’t that what we would expect when an illness never before experienced, well a pandemic, occurs?

I don’t usually listen to Jeremy Vine, but heard this when I was driving yesterday. Sarah Jarvis was primarily talking about the impact of long covid, she was not suggesting in any way that vaccination was not the best option for people to protect themselves.

ronib

Whatever the truth of damage caused by Covid vaccines, surely it is important to be able to express opposing viewpoints? Or have we been so brainwashed and browbeaten?

Viewpoints don't all carry equal weight. People need to be able to analyse and evaluate.

Despite all the "noise", there is virtually no scientifically validated evidence against vaccines.

ronib

My eldest child had a severe reaction when one year old and my gp advised against a booster jab and also not to vaccinate my other children. They were fine.
Maybee70

Of course you were right to take the GP’s advice. There will always be a small minority of individuals who cannot take a vaccine for very specific reasons particular to them.

I’m glad your child was fine.

Do you know why she / he was fine? If you understand how vaccinations work across the population as a whole, then you will know why your child was fine.

So for those of us who have not seen the programme what does she actually say? I've checked her out quickly and she took part in the early trials of the vaccine at Chelsea and Westminster and was totally supportive of the vaccination programme. We all know a small percentage of people had bad reactions and the pfizer vaccine caused heart inflammation in some patients and is no long recommended for everyone. The vaccines have been used for over Four years now, is there new information?

Are you suggesting some kind of conspiracy theory here?

I’ve just scanned various reports of her interviews from the pandemic to present day. My impression is she was giving information based on her knowledge and experience at various different times. Isn’t that what we would expect when an illness never before experienced, well a pandemic, occurs?

I heard Dr Sarah Jarvis on Radio 2 today talking about people damaged from covid jabs. When covid started, She initially told listeners and viewers that she did not approve of the jabs . She was then taken off air I believe. Some time later she was back on air again day after day, week in, week out and no doubt earning a fortune, telling everyone to get jabbed.

Today she is giving all the facts and figures on people damaged by the jabs.

Thanks for the reference Iam64
I’ve heard Covid or the vaccine blamed for so many things, but Autism was a new one for me.

Mollygo

Re cancer and Covid.
I’ve also read recently and I’m hunting up the source, that Covid is responsible for the increase in Autism and other neurodiverse issues.

That would be Robert F Kennedy Jr.
That well respected and knowledgable medical expertb

I was just about to say that foxie. If enough children have the measles vaccine they will protect those who don’t or unfortunately can’t. It was always with a certain amount of trepidation that I had my children vaccinated.

Ronib what of course we will never know is how damaging it might or might not have been for your other children to have been vaccinated. I absolutely defend your right to make a choice based on experience but what I don't defend is the prolification of conspiracy theories based on very little evidence that put children and others at risk. We vaccinate to protect others as well as ourselves, often those of us who can't be vaccinated rely on those who can, stepping up and being vaccinated. It's how societies work, we do things to help others as well as ourselves because we are invested in the survival of those around us as much as we are invested in our own survival.

My eldest child had a severe reaction when one year old and my gp advised against a booster jab and also not to vaccinate my other children. They were fine.
Maybee70

ronib

Whatever the truth of damage caused by Covid vaccines, surely it is important to be able to express opposing viewpoints? Or have we been so brainwashed and browbeaten?

You mean in the way that people are refusing to vaccinate their children for measles in America ( thanks to the man in charge of the nations health) which is putting all children at risk? There is a difference between informing people and downright scaremongering. The way that they’re saying that being persuaded to vaccinate a child is taking away personal liberty? What happens in America tends to filter through to this country. Still if that’s what people want good luck to them.

Re cancer and Covid.
I’ve also read recently and I’m hunting up the source, that Covid is responsible for the increase in Autism and other neurodiverse issues.

Whatever the truth of damage caused by Covid vaccines, surely it is important to be able to express opposing viewpoints? Or have we been so brainwashed and browbeaten?

Iam64

I read about the doctor at the Reform conference who suggested the Cancers suffered by the King and Princess of Wales were triggered by the Covid immunisations

If someone from the Labour Party had said that it would have been headline news in the tabloids. He also said it about two people who he knew could not reply in any way. Shameful and downright nasty imo.

I read about the doctor at the Reform conference who suggested the Cancers suffered by the King and Princess of Wales were triggered by the Covid immunisations

Allira

MayBee70

Allsorts

Well Rachel Reeves isn’t up to the job either and I have yet to find out what on earth that party stand for and i do not think they have any idea, This just leaves the door open for Farage, what a thought,

So, apart from ‘the boats’ can you tell me what Reform actually stand for?

Welfare cuts.
Cut taxes
Get us all back to work (can I have a sitting down job, please, Nige, my knees aren't up to much)
Slash energy bills (run round the block three times to get warm, sorry, see above)
Increase the cost of borrowing

They had an anti vacc’er speaking at their party conference today. Maybe that will filter it’s way into their policies?

Iam64

I wonder how many of us have worked in teams with a ‘principled Rosie Duffield’. I have and whilst I could admire the principle, it left the rest of the team picking up pieces, calming emotional temperatures and trying to do our jobs effectively without being accused of not being quite principled enough

fWIW I’m in no way defending the men are female nonsense

Yes, it's difficult even though you can admire their stance.
I admired Tony Ben although I didn't always agree with him and liked him more when I read his memoirs, he gave me hope.

Not without his flaws though, I suppose he was only human when it came to family.

Allira

Not at all PN

Did you not realise you can admire someone of principle without necessarily agreeing with them?

I do, but not from your post, I'm afraid. Thank you for clarifying.

I wonder how many of us have worked in teams with a ‘principled Rosie Duffield’. I have and whilst I could admire the principle, it left the rest of the team picking up pieces, calming emotional temperatures and trying to do our jobs effectively without being accused of not being quite principled enough

fWIW I’m in no way defending the men are female nonsense

MayBee70

Allsorts

Well Rachel Reeves isn’t up to the job either and I have yet to find out what on earth that party stand for and i do not think they have any idea, This just leaves the door open for Farage, what a thought,

So, apart from ‘the boats’ can you tell me what Reform actually stand for?

Welfare cuts.
Cut taxes
Get us all back to work (can I have a sitting down job, please, Nige, my knees aren't up to much)
Slash energy bills (run round the block three times to get warm, sorry, see above)
Increase the cost of borrowing