The most shocking part of the Angela Rayner debacle has been the way people have constantly gone on and on about her 'humble working class' origins, as if it was a amazing for a politician to have such a background
But Rayner is a member of the LABOUR party, the party set up by 'working class' people to represent themselves and in times past, a large proportion of their MPs had worked down mines, in shipyards and factories, so why should her social origins be of any interest at all. They should be normal for the Labour party.
In 1979 16% of MPs had worked in manual occupations, now it is down to 3%. that is spread across all major parties, including SNP. But the majority are likely to be in the Labour party.
Perhaps the failure of current governments and immediately past governments is due to the fact that they are no longer representative of the ordinary working population.
Too many lawyers (14%) and political organisers (17%). Too few, nurses, IT specialists, shop workers, warehouse operatives and the like.
All figures from a House of Commons Library research document, Social Background of MPs 1979-2019 researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7483/CBP-7483.pdf
Water shortages and hosepipe bans
AIBU to say that husband was irresponsible?
Struggling with estrangement from 2 adult children and dont know where to go from here.


