Gransnet forums

News & politics

Reform UK policies - posters often ask “what are they”

(14 Posts)
FriedGreenTomatoes2 Wed 29-Oct-25 18:58:46

In the ‘i’ paper today:

1
End PIP for 'non-major' anxiety cases
Only people with “serious” anxiety disorders would qualify for PIP, cutting off support for those with milder or moderate conditions.

2
Bring back face-to-face assessments
All disability benefit assessments would take place in person rather than remotely. Reform argues this will prevent “gaming the system” and ensure only those with ongoing needs receive support.

3
Reassess people more frequently
Claimants would undergo regular reviews to determine whether their conditions still warrant PIP payments, reducing the number of long-term awards.

4
Create rapid therapy and work pathways
Those who lose PIP because their condition is deemed “non-major” would be offered short-term therapy and job support to help them back into work.

5
Change how assessors are incentivised
Assessment providers would be rewarded for accuracy and fraud detection, not simply for completing cases. Reform says this would improve quality and fairness.

Sounds good to me.
What are your thoughts?

keepingquiet Wed 29-Oct-25 19:36:20

Ok- so we've turned back from getting at the immigrants to going back to getting at benefit 'scroungers.'

Nothing to read here.

GrannyGravy13 Wed 29-Oct-25 19:36:56

I think face-to-face assessments should be the norm, as long as those doing the assessing are appropriately qualified.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Wed 29-Oct-25 19:44:20

They were years ago GG13
I think it makes good sense. Back to pre-pandemic ways of assessment.

Galaxy Wed 29-Oct-25 19:57:48

It isn't about benefit scroungers us it, it is about an increasing amount of young people never entering the workforce. This is a disaster for those young people.

Maremia Wed 29-Oct-25 20:00:51

Agree with face to face appointments but would be concerned about the level of skill of the Assessors.

Skydancer Wed 29-Oct-25 20:01:38

Agree with all of it.

Maremia Wed 29-Oct-25 20:02:36

Also depends on the criteria used to assess.

Cossy Wed 29-Oct-25 20:15:14

It’s not about the skills of the assessors (ex DWP), they are a third party employed by the DWP and ALL of them are medically trained and qualified, however, huge however, they don’t just assess those claimants whom meet their medical experience/qualifications.

For example, a physio might assess a claimant with mental health issues, or a nurse with limited physio experience might assess a person with huge mobility issues.

PIP is a non means tested payment given to any individual aged between 18-67, whose mental or physical health (or both) affects them on a day to day basis. Many people in receipt of PIP work part time or full time.
PIP claimants already go through regular assessments, PIP is awarded for periods between 6 months and 10 years. 10 years tend to be conditions like autism or Down’s syndrome, those which don’t go away or improve.

There’s already a massive shortage of mental health therapists, where are Reform going to magic up these people from?

The assessors currently only make “recommendations” after the assessment, all the paperwork AND medical evidence is then sent back to DWP “decision makers” to make final decision and award.

Reform clearly have no idea what PIP is for, that it’s paid to both working and non working people and how the current process works!

Casdon Wed 29-Oct-25 20:22:35

None of these proposals are new. Fitness to Work Assessment processes have been around for almost 20 years, and there was a big crackdown during the Coalition Government in the 2010s to try to reduce the benefits bill.

Research from the House of Commons Library in November 2012 highlighted issues with the assessment's accuracy. It showed that 40% of initial decisions were appealed and 38% of those appeals were successful, suggesting problems with initial rulings.

Mental health concerns: There was significant criticism regarding how the WCA dealt with claimants with mental health issues. Critics argued that a "tick-box" form and brief interview were inadequate for assessing complex mental health conditions, and later legal action was initiated on these grounds.

Framework concerns: Parliamentary debate in early 2013, referencing the period of 2012, revealed tragic and heart-rending stories from constituents struggling with the system. Concerns were raised that the fundamental framework of the assessment was flawed and could not realistically determine a person's capability for work.

Contractor profit motive: Some concerns focused on Atos Healthcare, the private company conducting the assessments, with accusations that its profit motives were influencing the process.

All these issues will raise their head again with the same old proposals, which is exactly what these from Reform are. It won’t work.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Wed 29-Oct-25 20:47:56

It will.
We can’t keep on doing the same old nonsense and expecting a different result.

Maremia Wed 29-Oct-25 20:51:46

Thanks for the details, Casdon.

Casdon Wed 29-Oct-25 20:59:01

Here’s some more on what the Tories proposed.
www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-welfare-reform/2010-to-2015-government-policy-welfare-reform
There is nothing new in Farage’s proposals.

Cossy Thu 30-Oct-25 09:05:41

FriedGreenTomatoes2

It will.
We can’t keep on doing the same old nonsense and expecting a different result.

It’s nothing that isn’t already being done.

I think people muddle up PIP, with what used to been known as “sickness benefit”, then Employment & Support Allowance, now widely a part of Universal Credit. This is the means tested “sickness benefit”, which requires a Fit for work assessment and is an entirely different benefit to PIP!