Gransnet forums

News & politics

Rachel Reeves let out house unlawfully

(247 Posts)
Primrose53 Wed 29-Oct-25 21:05:05

www.thesun.co.uk/news/37163749/rachel-reeves-cabinet-unlicensed-rental-unlawful/

This deserves a thread of its own.

Funny how she and Angela Rayner both make these “minor mistakes”.

Allira Thu 30-Oct-25 18:37:23

Please give it a rest, Kemi.

OldFrill Thu 30-Oct-25 18:45:16

The Renters' Rights Act 2025 makes provision for licencing all English landlords but the fine detail has yet to be announced. When all landlords have to be licenced there will be less room for error as every lease/advert etc should have the licence number on it.

Jane43 Thu 30-Oct-25 18:53:04

shoppinggirl

Rachel Reeves seems to be very forgetful...She forgot to disclose that a benefactor had paid for her clothes; she forgot to disclose the free tickets for various venues and now this! Very worrying that she's "in charge" of the country's finances!

I am assuming you didn’t Google the facts before you posted. The facts are clothing was bought from a cash gift from a benefactor, Juliet Rosenfeld and the gift was declared. Everything was in accordance with the rules so there was no lapse of memory. She didn’t declare concert tickets given her but referred herself to the parliamentary standards committee over this.

Wyllow3 Thu 30-Oct-25 18:53:28

Allira

Please give it a rest, Kemi.

There is a point where it rebounds on her and her party.

She thought she held a weapon, but it looks likely it could blow up in her own hands. We only need some "me too's" from members of the public who have been caught out in this way (except of course if they've done something illegal to solve their problem)

Oh what tangled webs get woven.

DaisyAnneReturns Thu 30-Oct-25 19:03:09

Sorry if this has already been posted but it probably needs repeating to outweigh the nastiness on here.

The estate agent used by Rachel Reeves's have apologised for an "oversight" after failing to apply for a licence.

Harvey and Wheeler offered to apply for the necessary rental licence on the chancellor's home - and then didn't.

It's from Sky.

Mollygo Thu 30-Oct-25 20:57:29

The problem is, would he have, if it hadn’t arisen, and would it have been chased up if it hadn’t suddenly been exposed.

MaizieD Thu 30-Oct-25 21:07:07

Mollygo

The problem is, would he have, if it hadn’t arisen, and would it have been chased up if it hadn’t suddenly been exposed.

It would have been chased up by the local council if they had discovered it.

The local council has already said (according to the BBC) that if they discovered a property which should be licenced, but wasn't, they would notify the landlord and prosecute if the landlord failed to obtain a licence within 21 days of receipt of their notification,

It is clearly not a hanging offence in their view.

Wyllow3 Thu 30-Oct-25 21:26:55

Must be as its happened before.

But I bet, a lot of people would have not have reported it, or actively did corrupt deals or done private deals to either cover up or remedy it -

privately.

Skydancer Thu 30-Oct-25 21:27:32

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Storm in a teacup.

Yep. Boring.

Casdon Thu 30-Oct-25 21:29:18

Mollygo

The problem is, would he have, if it hadn’t arisen, and would it have been chased up if it hadn’t suddenly been exposed.

It’s not the problem though is it, because how could anybody possibly know the answer to a hypothetical question like that?

DaisyAnneReturns Thu 30-Oct-25 22:18:01

MaizieD

Mollygo

The problem is, would he have, if it hadn’t arisen, and would it have been chased up if it hadn’t suddenly been exposed.

It would have been chased up by the local council if they had discovered it.

The local council has already said (according to the BBC) that if they discovered a property which should be licenced, but wasn't, they would notify the landlord and prosecute if the landlord failed to obtain a licence within 21 days of receipt of their notification,

It is clearly not a hanging offence in their view.

That makes me feel it happens quite frequently Maizie. That sounds more like system failure.

Philippa111 Thu 30-Oct-25 22:59:52

It was a mistake. And yes she should have known more and been more thorough. But in the grand scheme of things it’s a minor transgression.
There is so much corruption in the world , do they really have to blow this up into a potential sacking offence? It’s ridiculous.
Just take a look at all the corruption that is going on in high places with millions being filched in dodgy deals by the already super rich. That’s where attention should be put.

25Avalon Thu 30-Oct-25 23:09:05

According to DM ( I know, I know) she admits she knew a licence was needed. She and Starmer will be glad of this furore regarding Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, no longer Prince of the realm.

MayBee70 Thu 30-Oct-25 23:10:25

And Mome has bought a multi million pound property even though she owes us taxpayers millions….but hey, let’s focus on Rachel Reeves shall we sad

Mollygo Thu 30-Oct-25 23:20:54

MayBee70

And Mome has bought a multi million pound property even though she owes us taxpayers millions….but hey, let’s focus on Rachel Reeves shall we sad

Yes Mone is bad news, but Reeves is in charge now and going to be dealing with our finances.
So yes, let’s focus on Rachel Reeves.

MayBee70 Thu 30-Oct-25 23:25:52

Lots of dead cat strategy going on these days.

Wyllow3 Thu 30-Oct-25 23:44:23

Looks like Reeves made a mistake and expected others to take necessary steps.

Mome cheated us all on a massive,massive scale and is rich beyond most people wildest dreams and shows absolute no contrition with what she did.

lets focus on the actual criminals, shall we

Homestead62 Thu 30-Oct-25 23:45:59

What a shockeroonie, self serving politicians who always seem to have terrible memories and forgotten emails/ letters. Well I never.

Wyllow3 Fri 31-Oct-25 00:43:51

I suggest a sense of proportion.

Did you see the news on Sudan tonight? Gaza? The vital debates to save out health services?

MaizieD Fri 31-Oct-25 01:54:12

25Avalon

According to DM ( I know, I know) she admits she knew a licence was needed. She and Starmer will be glad of this furore regarding Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, no longer Prince of the realm.

We all know that ‘she knew’, the email exchange would point to that. However, the professional business with which it is obvious that her husband was dealing said it was going to arrange the licence. Why should she insult both her husband and the professionals by obsessively double checking everything they were doing? It is way beyond reasonable to argue that she should have been doing that. It’s so far beyond reasonable that it feels downright spiteful. Which, of course, it probably is… 🙄

Shill29 Fri 31-Oct-25 06:30:18

I agree, the letting age, assuming she used one should have ensured everything was in place.

25Avalon Fri 31-Oct-25 07:41:08

The thing is you have to check and double check these days if you are in a position of power. The media are ready to look for dirt and dish it out. Reeves is unpopular in many areas and as I said she will be glad to go off the radar whilst bigger events take over the headlines.

StripeyGran Fri 31-Oct-25 07:55:23

MayBee70

Lots of dead cat strategy going on these days.

Why do you think they are being planted? What's really going on?

Mollygo Fri 31-Oct-25 08:02:22

^Why should she insult both her husband and the professionals by obsessively double checking everything they were doing? It is way beyond reasonable to argue that she should have been doing that.

Probably because we know that if it was us, saying we’d left it to our husband, would not have given us a get out excuse.

It’s so far beyond reasonable that it feels downright spiteful. Which, of course, it probably is… 🙄

Just read social media, any social media at the moment. Often seems that
Spiteful is the new be kind.

Iam64 Fri 31-Oct-25 08:11:17

I wonder how many of us could withstand a daily Mail investigation into every aspect of our lives? This is a non story. Blowing it up into a resigning or sacking issue is pathetic

Look at the home and international news and then worry or get outraged