Gransnet forums

News & politics

Tax coming for EV’s

(106 Posts)
Mollygo Thu 27-Nov-25 20:04:38

3p per mile🤣🤣🤣 Thats just for starters.
How is it going to be monitored?
RR didn’t seem to be aware that new cars don't need an MOT for 3 years.
Is she really going to trust owners to put in the correct mileage?
Or will a new government body be set up to monitor people’s use of credit cards at chargers?
Or will fuel providers be obliged to give details of those people who have signed up for a home charging deal?
Or will people suddenly be rushing to pay for their charging in cash?

Babamaman Sat 29-Nov-25 15:58:49

EVs use the roads do they should contribute! It won’t be long before government decide EVS are not good for the planet! Using Russian electricity, no way of disposing of the batteries, using children to go down the mines

Robin202 Sat 29-Nov-25 15:36:10

I heard on TV that EV drivers will have to present themselves at MOT testing centres annually to have their mileage recorded and submitted. A nice little extra earner for the lost MOT’s. !

Allira Sat 29-Nov-25 15:22:27

Overthemoongran

I understand that we will have to take our vehicles in once a year to have the mileage checked and noted. We drive in France quite a lot and already pay huge amounts in tolls to use the French motorways, now we will be paying double, as that mileage will be charged for here in the U.K. as well

It all sounds ill-thought-out.

Overthemoongran Sat 29-Nov-25 15:21:17

I understand that we will have to take our vehicles in once a year to have the mileage checked and noted. We drive in France quite a lot and already pay huge amounts in tolls to use the French motorways, now we will be paying double, as that mileage will be charged for here in the U.K. as well

Shill29 Sat 29-Nov-25 15:08:22

Agreed, how are they going to monitor it? How much will that cost to do? Hardly think it will encourage people to buy electric?

rosie1959 Sat 29-Nov-25 14:56:16

If you drive for business and clock up a lot of miles it will cost you a fair bit probably more than normal road tax.

Menopauselbitch Sat 29-Nov-25 14:54:27

Just a way to enforce black boxes.

Milest0ne Sat 29-Nov-25 14:52:50

A vehicle excise duty would seem simpler to administer. How they would collet on the "pay per mile" system on a car like ours is difficult to imagine. We bought a new car (not EV) in April and have just clocked up 2000 miles last week.

Cambia Sat 29-Nov-25 14:27:05

Why don’t they think things through before making great announcements. At the moment it sounds as the administration of the scheme is going to cost more than they collect (as usual). Why didn’t they just charge car tax on evs. So much simpler.
If it is going to be that complicated my ev will not be renewed and I will go back to petrol. So much for net zero.

Elizabethlovejoy Sat 29-Nov-25 14:15:20

Absolutely. No need for a whole new office of civil servants to monitor this either . all cars pay a new rate of annual road tax to replace fuel duty on petrol and diesel.simple to administer.

icanhandthemback Sat 29-Nov-25 14:07:02

Our family regularly drive abroad for several hundreds of miles at a time as part of their annual holiday plus visiting relatives who live abroad. How will that mileage be calculated. It is the worst plan I have seen for taxing cars.

rosie1959 Sat 29-Nov-25 11:39:13

Iam64

rosie59, I drove a mini countryman hybrid. My husband was 6’ 6ā€ and travelled comfortably in it.
I’d have bought a mini but need a big boot for my dogs. I agree with you about the state of our roads, like everything else I need of investment

Whichever government we had was always going to tax ev and hybrids.

My DH also had a mini but he was a teenager then now at 67 with chronic lymphadema in his legs i can guarantee he would no longer be able to get in one and if he did he wouldn't get out !
I think he now prefers his present car he won't admit it but he is a bit of a car snob wouldn't entertain the electric version.

Allira Sat 29-Nov-25 11:12:49

DH has a medium sized, very popular make of car.

It's fine in the front but the back is not at all suitable for adults, especially those with even slight mobility problems, to get in or out, as I found myself recently!

Iam64 Sat 29-Nov-25 11:08:41

rosie59, I drove a mini countryman hybrid. My husband was 6’ 6ā€ and travelled comfortably in it.
I’d have bought a mini but need a big boot for my dogs. I agree with you about the state of our roads, like everything else I need of investment

Whichever government we had was always going to tax ev and hybrids.

Mollygo Sat 29-Nov-25 09:45:51

rosie1959
And quite frankly the roads around here are appalling even the A road is falling apart as is pretty unsafe to drive on.

True for many places. The road I drive along to get to work, which is also a bus route is a mass of potholes. Cars swerve to avoid them. Dangerous, additionally since this road passes two school entrances.

With the state of the roads it would make sense to anyone, except the government, to use more of the VED gained from vehicles, to repair the damage caused by vehicles.
Cynically I suspect that if that was ever to happen, the roads in London would be the first to benefit.

rosie1959 Sat 29-Nov-25 09:17:42

GrannyGravy13

Witzend VED is already more expensive for bigger cars. DH has a 4 wheel drive beast he pays £760 a year.

Same here DH has a F pace which has a VED of around Ā£650 a year but quite frankly a small car would be of no use whatsoever he is well over 6ft with legs that really don’t bend as well as they used to.
My son has a huge Ford Ranger that is massive but he uses it for work where a small car really would not work.
And quite frankly the roads around here are appalling even the A road is falling apart as is pretty unsafe to drive on

GrannyGravy13 Sat 29-Nov-25 08:55:59

Witzend VED is already more expensive for bigger cars. DH has a 4 wheel drive beast he pays £760 a year.

Witzend Sat 29-Nov-25 08:43:11

Astitchintime

It would be far simpler to tax ALL vehicles regardless. They all cause wear to the roads after all.

I’d like to see double road tax for the enormous cars like tanks, which must cause more wear and tear on the roads.
There are a lot of them around here.

DaisyAnneReturns Sat 29-Nov-25 08:38:03

Calendargirl

Martin Lewis did a budget special tonight, he said he has no idea how the government are going to implement this, and neither do they (still a work in progress)!

He often doesn't.

Jane43 (Thu 27-Nov-25 20:29:38) and Mamie (Fri 28-Nov-25 04:19:14) seem to see a more positive way forward.

MayBee70 Sat 29-Nov-25 05:34:52

ā€œA single heavy goods vehicle (HGV) can do tens of thousands of times more damage to a road than a car. This is because road damage is proportional to the fourth power of the axle weight; an increase in weight causes a disproportionately larger amount of damage. For example, a standard 44-tonne HGV can do over 136,000 times more damage than a car like a Ford Focusā€.

MayBee70 Sat 29-Nov-25 05:33:25

Lorries cause a huge amount of damage compared to cars. Which was one reason for HS2.

Allira Fri 28-Nov-25 21:50:09

Maybe it’s acknowledging the wear and tear on roads caused by all vehicles.
VED isn’t specifically used for road maintenance as we well know.

Yes, all vehicles cause erosion of road services.
We'd have the best roads in Europe if all the VED was spent on the roads.

David49 Fri 28-Nov-25 21:42:33

ā€œThat's what I was querying. A measure, VED, based on emissions to encourage people to buy low emissions cars has been divorced from its purpose by applying it at a high rate to cars with minimal emissions. It doesn't make sense.ā€

The government has to make up for the fuel tax lost, it’s one way of doing that, collects it with annual taxation is an efficient way to do it
So there is an element of emissions plus luxury car tax, plus milage charge, if you buy a petrol or diesel car of equivalent performance the taxation is much higher.

Mollygo Fri 28-Nov-25 21:36:32

Maybe it’s acknowledging the wear and tear on roads caused by all vehicles.
VED isn’t specifically used for road maintenance as we well know.
It is spread thinly across

Public Services: Essential services like healthcare (NHS), education, and law enforcement.
Infrastructure Development:
A portion of government spending, which VED contributes to, supports major transport infrastructure projects, including new roads, smart motorways, and railway improvements.
And, looking at the state of the roads near us, even more thinly on
Local Projects: Funds are allocated to local councils for a variety of local services, including road resurfacing, pothole repairs, and maintaining public parks and street lighting.

MaizieD Fri 28-Nov-25 20:36:14

Allira

Mollygo

My new last year hybrid costs us £195 VED. Its emissions evidently have nothing to do with the cost. DDs much older car costs £10pa.

Mine, which is a bit older than yours, is also £195 pa.

The emissions are very low, according to what it tells me after each journey.

That's what I was querying. A measure, VED, based on emissions to encourage people to buy low emissions cars has been divorced from its purpose by applying it at a high rate to cars with minimal emissions. It doesn't make sense.