Starmer welcoming someone

I think they are a tool of democracy, where that might lead I am not sure.

Why not have a look at the Guardian online about this issue?

Because I read about the issue yesterday if not the day before ( it all blurs into one at this time of year).

I think he has something the security services want and they are partly at least behind the decision. I have no doubt he will be closely monitored.

For his foul tweets, remove his vicarious British citizenship, based on the fact his mother was here for short while as a student, we hand it out like confett. Thanks Patel. Jail him for 3 years, I as a taxpayer am not happy to support this vile individual, and his family, for life, because no one in their right mind would employ him.
I am pleased to say neither of my local MPs signed a letter agreeing to him coming here, and several that did are now writing to starmer to ask him to review granting this Islamist the right to come here. So angry .

Wyllow3

I think he has something the security services want and they are partly at least behind the decision. I have no doubt he will be closely monitored.

Yes, I wondered that.

The gift of British citizenship has been given far too lightly, but once given it will be almost impossible to remove; the lawyers will see to that. Parliament is becoming more and more subservient to human rights laws, when it should be Parliament which is supreme. Starmer is a human rights lawyer, and will endorse all legal challenges to his deportation.

Why do politicians of all parties waste so much time on these undesirables with the most tenuous of links to Britain? Or is it just lawyers, representing the legal profession, using these cases to to undermine Parliament's supremacy?

It’s a mystery Eazybee

MaizieD

Galaxy

It took twitter about 30 seconds to find his tweets.

Extraordinary that no-one managed to find them when the tory government was pressing for his release.

Exactly MaizieD the BBC pointed out yesterday on the news that it was a cross party group campaigning for his release.

Do you think that is reassuring?

I find it extraordinary that all the politicians involved in battling for this man to be freed by the Egyptian government and the FO, claim to have never seen any of his awful comments.It’s a level of ineptitude and incompetence that beggars belief.

Galaxy

Do you think that is reassuring?

It wasn't posted for 'reassurance' (but then, I don't see security threats under every bed). It was posted to question why, after more than a decade of positive UK government support for Fattah, mostly by tory governments, these tweets, which date from 2011, weren't 'discovered' sooner? Strange how they have suddenly emerged in time to cause maximum embarrassment to a Labour government.

I suppose that Starmer just carried on following whatever the Conservatives had been doing, without giving it much thought.

This government has already peaked at maximum embarrassment without this.

Peaks can recur over time...

Possibly because people on twitter are better at this sort of thing these days. I am delighted that that information has been discovered.

eazybee

^Extraordinary that no-one managed to find them when the tory government was pressing for his release.^

Yes I too am surprised. Very.
I am not quite sure what you are insinuating

I’m also surprised there was no outcry from Labour about this.
Where were all the posts about this back then?
To be fair, I didn’t know about the matter, but I’m not really one of the ardent “if it’s happening in N&P then I’ve got some expertise to share” posters.

The whole debacle raises the question of how efficient are our systems for giving citizenship or asylum. It just beggars belief that the powers that be (on either side of the political spectrum) wouldn't check social media where people are often unfiltered. I can't stand Trump, nor his politics, but his requirement of being able to check your social media upon entry to a country might well be a good idea. We just need to ensure that we don't use reasonable political ideology or criticism to keep people out.

Alaa Abdel Fallah was not subjected to a normal examination when applying for British citizenship because he claimed it through his mother who was born in London while her mother was studying for a PHD, one of the loopholes apparently of the Human Rights Law. He also claimed to be a prisoner of conscience, hence the cross party support. The Conservatives granted him citizenship.
Since becoming PM Starmer has avidly supported his case and welcomed him into Britain without running basic checks on his background.
Abdel has 'apologised unreservedly for his offensive racist tweets.'
This was followed however by:
"I am shaken that, just as I am being reunited with my family for the first time in 12 years, several historic tweets of mine have been republished and used to question and attack my integrity and values, escalating to calls for the revocation of my citizenship." BBC website, today.
Integrity and values?
Gratitude?

Galaxy

Possibly because people on twitter are better at this sort of thing these days. I am delighted that that information has been discovered.

Pretty much everyone I know got rid of X when Musk took over. I can't see many people randomly researching tweets and retweets from 2010 on a regular basis.
There is something very strange about how this has suddenly emerged to ensure maximum blame aimed at the Labour Government. The story broken by the Mail and the Telegraph; who would have thought it?

Nobody I knew got rid of X, that's confirmation bias on both our parts. It is an incredibly useful tool, and of course also has its share of crazies. It has been beyond useful for feminists in various campaigns/ sharing of information.
I couldn't care how or why the information came out. That's not my priority when people are speaking of killing Jews.

Mamie

Galaxy

Possibly because people on twitter are better at this sort of thing these days. I am delighted that that information has been discovered.

Pretty much everyone I know got rid of X when Musk took over. I can't see many people randomly researching tweets and retweets from 2010 on a regular basis.
There is something very strange about how this has suddenly emerged to ensure maximum blame aimed at the Labour Government. The story broken by the Mail and the Telegraph; who would have thought it?

Who'd have thunk it, indeed?

To me, he bears all the hallmarks of someone who self dramatises and has little sense of reality on the MH spectrum and gets everyone running around him in a most dramatic way.

As far as I know, he has committed no actual crimes and never planned any actual offences?

Mamie

Galaxy

Possibly because people on twitter are better at this sort of thing these days. I am delighted that that information has been discovered.

Pretty much everyone I know got rid of X when Musk took over. I can't see many people randomly researching tweets and retweets from 2010 on a regular basis.
There is something very strange about how this has suddenly emerged to ensure maximum blame aimed at the Labour Government. The story broken by the Mail and the Telegraph; who would have thought it?

Exactly, Mamie!

What a coincidence...

But this is puzzling me, from yesterday's BBC News on line report:

In 2014, Abdel Fattah was nominated for a European human rights award, the Sakharov Prize, but this was withdrawn over tweets about Israel he posted in 2012.

Why didn't the tories act? Why did they allow his citizenship? Why did they call for his release?

(And I might just remind folks that the current leader of the tory party has UK citizenship acquired in dubious circumstances)

This is the problem that badenoch has, in that much of what she says is interesting and I agree with a some of it, but obviously this is set against what the Tories actually did in power, on many subjects not just this one. However if the bar is set to 'labour are jut as bad as the tories' that's not really an party ai am interested in.

Excuse typos