'will have to be stopped'
How and by whom?
Trump and the full force of the USA hasn't managed so far.
Is Islam a religion of love and peace?
.......even if he wants to because he's lost control of Netanyahu.
The Israeli military is going berserk with the full blessing of Netanyahu. The US giving him support was a disastrous mis-calculation and now Israel seemingly doesn't need Trump anymore.
If he thought he would have the Iran business done and dusted in about a week, and he would come out of it as King of the World........well, his biggest mistake (among many) so far.
'will have to be stopped'
How and by whom?
Trump and the full force of the USA hasn't managed so far.
The only other ships are Greek owned, otherwise pretty much all Iranian, Indian and Chinese.
Iran acting as pirates and charging large amounts of money to allow them through.
It can’t go on, so one way or the other will have to be stopped.
fancythat
According to Wkikpedia
International law
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz is, according to some analysts, a violation of international law. According to Majid Rafizadeh, the blocking of the strait by Iran amounts to a violation of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, since it violates the right to transit in a "strait used for international navigation".[161][162] The placement of sea mines in the strait by Iran is seen by Just Security as a violation of the law of the sea, violating the Hague VIII convention.[163]
It would all be much more shocking if Israel snd the USA had been whiter than white in their actions, but both are guilty of war crimes, including on the high seas.
Maremia
Oh no WhiteWave, do you mean there is no truce?
No truce but an extension of Trumps demands - which he won’t get.
Iranian can now demand all sorts to open the Straits such as compensation for the destruction of their infrastructure. it as a big toll road and so forth.
Trump can’t de-escalate or escalate for obvious reasons.
What a fool that man is.
Oh no WhiteWave, do you mean there is no truce?
According to Wkikpedia
International law
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz is, according to some analysts, a violation of international law. According to Majid Rafizadeh, the blocking of the strait by Iran amounts to a violation of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, since it violates the right to transit in a "strait used for international navigation".[161][162] The placement of sea mines in the strait by Iran is seen by Just Security as a violation of the law of the sea, violating the Hague VIII convention.[163]
Oreo
Maremia
And yet, some ships are getting through.
Only because the ships belong to India or China or Russia, they’re the only ‘friends’ the Iranian regime have ( says a lot).
So the Iranians don’t send drones to attack them.
This is what has actually gone through, it’s not just India and China by any means?
uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/cargo-ships-passing-hormuz-strait-135219674.html
Whitewavemark2
Maremia
And the US Navy has declined to lead others through, so perhaps they don't actually know where they are,
or perhaps they don't want to be set up as shooting targets for whatever else the Iranians have managed to hold onto.Yes you are right. The US Navy has no clue where they are, and their minesweepers are ineffective according to a navel bod I was listening to this morning.
He suggests that it is an impossible problem, and the Iranians hold all the cards at present just with a few mines snd cheap drones.
The way he explained, the mines are now very very small, will detonate simply through pressure and are lethal.
I have said all along, I think we should accept the Strait being closed.
And accept the consequences.
It is all far too dangerous.
I've not read the Strait has been mined. Link please.
I wonder if it's actually true that Trump has just paid Iran millions for their oil?
While at war.
Will watch out for verification about this.
Trump lies and talks big, the Iranians lie and talk big.
Who is this Naval guru Whitewavemark2 ? 😄
The US Navy is a damn site better than ours, and the Iranian ships are destroyed.
The real problem is that ships have to go so close to the Iranian shore as they go through the Strait.
It will be worked out one way or the other.
I’ll get back, but it seems to have been confirmed that trump lied about the talks
Surprise, surprise😄😄
Maremia
And the US Navy has declined to lead others through, so perhaps they don't actually know where they are,
or perhaps they don't want to be set up as shooting targets for whatever else the Iranians have managed to hold onto.
Yes you are right. The US Navy has no clue where they are, and their minesweepers are ineffective according to a navel bod I was listening to this morning.
He suggests that it is an impossible problem, and the Iranians hold all the cards at present just with a few mines snd cheap drones.
The way he explained, the mines are now very very small, will detonate simply through pressure and are lethal.
Maremia
And yet, some ships are getting through.
Only because the ships belong to India or China or Russia, they’re the only ‘friends’ the Iranian regime have ( says a lot).
So the Iranians don’t send drones to attack them.
Unless they’re prepared to move the mines about all the time, which would be observed anyway, it should be obvious to the US military where the mines are ( if any) by watching the ships go through.
And Trump has backed off, for a while, thank goodness.
And the US Navy has declined to lead others through, so perhaps they don't actually know where they are,
or perhaps they don't want to be set up as shooting targets for whatever else the Iranians have managed to hold onto.
Maremia
Another question is which ship will be first to try?
Brave captains.
The bigger question is which company will be willing to insure the ships!
The Iranians will have an exact blue print of where the mines are, which is why they are able to get ships through, but no other ship should be willing to take the risk and kill its crew.
Trump’s legacy.
And yet, some ships are getting through.
Oreo
Casdon
Are you referring to the mines laid in this particular case ronib, or is that just a generalist comment about the type of mines that are available?
Since we’re talking of possible mines in the Strait of Hormuz it rather goes without saying?
You misunderstand Oreo. What I meant was does ronib know that all these three types of mines were used by Iran in the Straits? My thought is that they are not stupid, if they wanted to lay mines they would only lay a type that they had tracked and anchored, where they know exactly where they are, and they would escort the ships of friendly nations through away from the places they had laid the mines.
Whitewavemark2
To absolutely no one’s surprise whatsoever the Iranians have denied that any talks have taken place.
You do realise that the Iranian regime lies all the time too?
Casdon
ronib
Iran is charging 2 million dollars to escort certain ships from the Strait of Hormuz. My question is how can this be done safely if the Strait is littered with mines?
If you have laid the mines you know exactly where they are, and what route to take to avoid them?
In that case every ship can see the way through, as can US military which has eyes on everything.
I still don’t see how it could be mined with certain ships going through.
Casdon
Are you referring to the mines laid in this particular case ronib, or is that just a generalist comment about the type of mines that are available?
Since we’re talking of possible mines in the Strait of Hormuz it rather goes without saying?
This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion
Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.