Oreo
Actually I understand why a referendum was needed on leaving the EU as there had been one to go into the EU in the first place.Why should such an important thing be just left to a political party?
The earlier refendum 1975 I think, was the first time I could vote.
This was held to ratify and secure the treaty of Rome and was clear in its intentions (I don't remember the proportion of votes necessary for it to pass) the decision had already been made by Harold Wilson's government. If the vote had been to reject the treaty then more negotiations would have taken place- so I don't think this argument holds.
Should we have had a vote on Johnson's non-deal? Maybe it would have helped but there would have been a massive boycott- the Leave supporters already detemined that Leave means Leave.
If Cameron had achieved a majority government maybe there would have been no need for a referendum, but he had promised there would be one and so decided to go with it thinking Remain would win.
We know there was Russian interference in the campaign, the Labour party were led by someone who was anti-European, and speaking from experience the Remain campaign was a shambles.
Hence the debacle and the consequences we are still dealing with.


