Casdon
For me, your last sentence epitomises what is wrong with the way much of the public view the actions of politicians Oreo. Securing the future of the UK by becoming more self sustaining and working with our only true allies is the most important thing, but we have become so complacent that we think that our short term needs and wants, which no party can ever hope to meet, are more important than that.
I do agree working closely with EU allies is a good thing. But this was already Starmer's declared position direction. It is also a very incremental, step by step, measured and slow negotiation. No big wins easily seen in the distance for the electorate.
I also agree the public might have short term needs and wants but it would underestimate a sizeable portion of the electorate to believe their expect their short term needs and wants would be delivered quickly. Further there is nothing short term about the public's concerns about cost of living, fears about the cost of fuel in the coming winter period, increasing rents and shortage of available housing.
I think its more the case that a sizeable part of the electorate wants to trust that Starmer understands their key wants and needs and has a clear plan how to get there and communicates it.
But, the key messages I took away from Starmer's speech yesterday were:
1) His defiance and vow to stay on as PM- thats where he began and finished
2) He wants to rebuild UK's relationship with Europe- incremental, slow, already announced.
3) To take full public ownership of British Steel
4) Position Labour as the 'Mainstream Party of Power" what does that actually mean!? The local election voting pattern last Thursday evidence vote fracture AWAY from the 2 main parties
5) "Dark Path" warning- ie streamer launched a fierce attack on Reform UK.
There may have been more but that's what I took away. But if Starmer asked all those who knocked on doors when recently canvassing - what were the top things that came up in their views of the Labour Party and what the public wanted and needed - I suspect NONE of the above featured much.
Therein lies Starmer's problem, and therein, sadly, I think lies the problem for the Labour Party- if Starmer continues to vow to remain PM into the next GE with his current mind set.
I would much prefer to see a structured period of transition, with a date for Starmer to stand down, perhaps around the time of Autumn Labour conference and a none chaotic consideration for the successor.
That approach has the benefit of not spooking the financial markets as much as is happening currently and would avoid continuing leadership no confidence chaos. A successor MAY turn things round and MAY perform better as a Leader. However if Starmer remains the chance of this happening is far lower.
Starmer I feel is better suited in personality. and style to be Foreign Secretary.