Gransnet forums

News & politics

Keir’s farewell

(90 Posts)
MawsRosie Wed 15-Jul-26 23:10:38

I was struck by the mutual respect, even affection in the tribute by Kemi Badenoch and the good humour in the exchanges between her and the Prime Minister.
The Commons at its best!

Samwam Fri 17-Jul-26 09:20:43

Editorial from the Morning Star

This sums up Starmer as leader and PM for me perfectly.

ON FRIDAY Keir Starmer will leave the leadership of the Labour Party, having debased and disgraced the office over his six-year tenure.

Whatever hopes and fears there may be concerning his successor, Andy Burnham, it would be near impossible for the new leader to be as bad as the outgoing one.

Starmer was elected on a fraudulent prospectus, posing as a supporter of Jermey Corbyn with added “competence” when he was no such thing.

He soon revealed himself to be an entrenched rightwinger, who discarded all the policies and commitments on which he had stood for election.

He also discarded the coalition of voters that Corbyn’s leadership had assembled in 2017 and secured even fewer votes in 2024 that Corbynism did at its 2019 nadir.

Instead he handed the party over to the most bitter and malicious rightwingers, thirsting for revenge against the left.

The most authoritarian Labour leader ever, his tenure was marked by expulsions, witch-hunts, the withdrawal of the whip from dissenting MPs and the marginalisation of the membership.

His initial mendacity and deceit shaped everything that happened since, marking him out as untrustworthy and politically incoherent.

His predilection for falsehoods stayed with him to the end. At his last Prime Ministers Questions in the Commons he smeared Labour under Corbyn as having been found “institutionally antisemitic.” No such finding was ever made.

Just two weeks ago he claimed he had inherited a bankrupt party. False again.

Having failed so spectacularly as prime minister, it seems that Starmer can only find consolation in smearing his predecessor, who was everything he is not in terms of principle and conviction.

Nor was he competent. It is now acknowledged that he failed to make any preparations for government, despite it being evident from 2022 at least that a Labour victory was certain.

So he had blundered from U-turn to U-turn, launching attacks on working people only to be forced to retreat under mass pressure.

He has hewed close to Treasury and City orthodoxy in economics while backing Israel’s genocide in Gaza, sabre-rattling against Russia and pandering to Donald Trump.

At home, he has extended authoritarianism by every measure, from proscribing Palestine Action to curbing jury trials to clamping down on the right to protest.

The future of our economy and social provision has been mortgaged to a massive arms build-up.

And, like Boris Johnson before him, Starmer has been up to his neck in sleaze.

In opposition he claimed epic expenses. Then he took free clothing, glasses, accommodation and tickets from millionaire Waheed Alli in an orgy of grifting, even as he was slashing winter fuel benefit for pensioners.

He was finally undone by appointing Peter Mandelson, already known to be a close friend of convicted financier and paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and an intimate of sundry oligarchs, as ambassador to Washington.

A brazenly factional move, it led to the departure of Starmer’s consigliere Morgan McSweeney, without whom he lost whatever capacity to govern that he had to begin with.

The damage he has done to the Labour Party is immense and lasting. Even by David Lammy’s diminished standards to declare this week that Starmer will be remembered as “a giant of the labour movement” was a remarkably stupid encomium.

He will be remembered in fact as Labour’s least successful prime minister since Ramsay MacDonald, who at least had the distinction of being the first, and its most dishonest and undemocratic leader ever.

Starmer was one thing only — a loyal servant of the bourgeois state. When he steps down today, the air is at least a little cleaner in the labour movement.

MayBee70 Fri 17-Jul-26 09:37:20

Written by the Morning Star! Well, they would say that wouldn’t they. An orgy of grifting? A few clothes and a pair of glasses….

AGAA4 Fri 17-Jul-26 09:51:42

The Morning Star is a communist newspaper with a small circulation. Their biased views are of no interest to me.

67notout Tue 21-Jul-26 17:16:14

I always disliked that Rachel from accounts tag, very demeaning and frankly the kind of thing women have had to put up with from men and the media for years/decades. I particularly disliked it when women friends of mine were using the tag.

MayBee70 Tue 21-Jul-26 17:51:36

I will always maintain that she was under far more scrutiny as a woman than a male Chancellor would have had.

Anniebach Tue 21-Jul-26 19:36:27

The Morning Star ! No thank you

valdali Tue 21-Jul-26 19:49:51

watermeadow

I felt so sorry for Keir Starmer, a good and decent man who was so unfit for his post and will be remembered as yet another failure at the top job.

This is so patronising.
There were several reasons why he left, but having failed at his job wasn't one of them.

Nightsky2 Tue 21-Jul-26 20:12:20

FriedGreenTomatoes2

I just think so many of the LP had their knives out for KS tgat some of the back slapping and cheering seemed disingenuous really. Maybe suddenly some felt emotional because they felt a tad guilty?

More than a tad guilty I would say. What a load of hypocrites they are.

Ilovecheese Tue 21-Jul-26 20:22:39

67notout

I always disliked that Rachel from accounts tag, very demeaning and frankly the kind of thing women have had to put up with from men and the media for years/decades. I particularly disliked it when women friends of mine were using the tag.

I agree. I also dislike deliberate mispelling of names or making up names E.G Millibrain instead of Milliband. It just looks childish to me.

Ilovecheese Tue 21-Jul-26 20:25:23

The Morning Star does at least know what a woman is.

nanna8 Wed 22-Jul-26 06:00:41

That article sums Keir Starmer up perfectly. He was the most dreadful PM, worse than the previously dreadful incumbents. Thanks goodness you can now look ahead with at least a hint of optimism and a half decent leader.

Maremia Wed 22-Jul-26 06:39:13

I have never understood why he took those gifts.
Just don't, anyone, just don't.

Polar22 Wed 22-Jul-26 11:26:37

Out of interest … will you call John Healy ‘John from accounts’?

Maremia Wed 22-Jul-26 11:39:20

Interestingly Samwan, the Good Law Project had a Facebook post that echoed what you were saying.
Morgan McSweeney got a few mentions.