Whitewavemark2
mum2three
Which is better....to try to anticipate future problems and take precautions or wait until something drastic happens and then deal with it?
Greenland is a huge landmass and strategically placed. Any sensible politician can see the potential benefit to a country hostile to the west.You are a bit behind the times - that was agreed decades ago between Truman, Greenland/Denmark.
The original agreement remains unaltered.
Anyway, any normal head of state wanting to discuss closer ties or reviving former bases in a territory with its own government but belonging to a fellow NATO member, would surely go about it diplomatically. Not Trump, who started "discussion" off by threatening to take over Greenland.


