Whitewavemark2
Plunger
Brexit didn't stand a chance of working because the result was not what was expected or wanted by most political parties. No real effort was made to make it work. As soon as the result was announced the talk seemed to be how to rejoin.
What should have been done to make Brexit successful?
You ask an excellent question, WWmk2. One which has frequently asked, but to which there never seems to have been an answer.
It has always seemed to me that if a change to a system is being called for then those proposing the change should be able to not only outline their argument for change but also have a detailed plan for how the change would be carried out.
It was immediately obvious, once the referendum result had been announced, that there was no plan in place, Indeed, it was argued that the government which implemented the referendum should have had a fully worked out plan for how to implement the changes needed in order to implement the result. Which is absurd. Why should a government which didn't want to change the status quo have to have planned how to implement something it didn't want? It was surely the responsibility of those who wanted to change it to have The Plan?
And the responsibility of those who voted to leave the EU to have studied The Plan and be able to explain it to those who were against the idea.
As it was, those who voted to leave said 'We've told you what we want to do, i.e Leave, and just sat back and expected it to happen...
And it's no good people claiming that Brexit hasn't been done 'properly' when there was never any properly worked out plan for 'doing it properly' in the first place.