Yes I agree it's up to the students themselves to complain in a university setting, although I did read somewhere he taught A level students, maybe in normal attire. Presenting himself as a quasi half woman half man is clearly some sort of fetish on his part. It's hard to believe that this could be allowed in the workplace it's simply unacceptable at a time when there is a supposed drive to stop hatred against women which at times comes across as somewhat selective imo.
Like many on here MN is often the place to go to find out just what so many women have to put up with, mainly a younger demographic who are out in the cut and thrust so their perspective is possibly different from ours. Another current thread along with this matter, is a woman who was attending an event in Brighton, queuing for the women's loos, a long one, in that line were four trans women, needless to say no queue for the men's where they easily could have gone, rather proving they're just being difficult and provocative knowing they're not supposed to go into women only spaces. The poster had her child with her so didn't want to get herself into a situation. I'm wondering what difference in real life has the ruling had on those determined to flout it. I've read of situations in the NHS, in the aftermath of it being passed, where staff have been told "use the facilities you feel most comfortable with" Comfortable for them means the opposite for women who do not wish to be put in potentially uncomfortable situations.
