I agree that kids can feel grief, too, if a gp who was important in their lives is suddenly removed. That's why I don't get how parents can do this except in the most extreme circumstances. In some cases, I think they feel the gps have gotten "too close" to the gc, especially if they left gc in gp care a lot, etc. Then the parents have second thoughts about that gp/gc bond and try to loosen the ties. That's what I think Aqua's son and dil want to do, for example. And I get it a little bit if they think gm has "too much influence" or if even if they feel guilty that they didn't'couldn't give the kids more time themselves. But I don't see why they can't just lower contact in that case, rather than go nc altogether. Loosen the gp/gc bonds if they want, but not break them entirely.
I'm NOT saying that they should necessarily loosen those bonds. Just that if they want to, lowing contact would be enough. Why try to totally erase the gp from the child;s life?
They really can't anyway if the child is old enough to have fond memories of the gp. They're going to question it eventually, and they're not going to accept, "Gm was too busy" all the time. There will be comeuppance in some of these cases, even if the parents feel they had good reason to go nc. If they do, imo, they need to own it, and say something like, "We have issues with gramma." Anything less is cowardice, imo. Besides, lies and distortions won't work forever. Kids figure stuff out. For whatever those thoughts are worth.
Unite the Kingdom and Pro Palestine marches Cup 16th May 2026
Which British song sums up the 1960s for you?
Times article claim that Waspi women are tone deaf and should read the room


and hugs to you x
