Hetty58
I am sorry to say I do find him to be a bad man. I read carefully through the OP's letter which I copied out and highlighted the parts where he is being difficult and causing her problems and making her life intolerable in deliberate and knowing ways so as to manipulate her to get what he wants. This would show not a good man doing bad things but a bad man. A bad man deliberately does bad things.
I thought I would quote these to explain why I thought he was responsible for such behaviour and was deliberately using SJ to take over her house and to brow beat her so that he could take up permanent residence there and do as he pleased. I was going to explain that these showed he was a bad man, an abusive man. However, I found so many! (I think it was 33) They constitute practically the whole of the script! It would be unfeasible to keep quoting them. He is clearly a very unreasonable and selfish man. He is doing dreadful things in a house which belongs to the person he calls his Partner. A house which is not his at all but was her home and he is using it in such a way as to detrimentally alter her life, make her home into somewhere she cannot be happy. He is refusing to do as she asks regarding how she runs her home, and has effectively taken over as if it is his right to do as he pleases without permission. Now he is not even contributing to the costs of staying there! He is shouting, arguing, speaking abusively to her! He is not looking after the cat, because he is over-feeding it against her wishes and it is not his cat. He is even manipulating the cat to like him more than its owner! How low can he stoop?
Sorry, Hetty, I do not see any good in this man. I see manipulation, passive aggression, overt aggression, threatening behaviour and vast amounts of controlling and coercive behaviour. To order workmen to do work on a house that is not your own without the owner's consent is diabolical! He is behaving like a tyrant, an egomaniac. He does not show any respect for his partner, no care or concern. He does not care how unhappy she is, yet she makes it so abundantly clear she is now desperate, fighting for survival emotionally. His response is is to bully her all the more! He is not supporting her, not financially, practically, or emotionally! He is deliberately wearing her down, making her feel weaker and less able to cope, diminishing her 'sense of self', making her feel she cannot cope without him, forcing her to be dependent on him and to have to let him do whatever he likes.
He wormed his way in initially saying his stay was temporary, he was going to stay till Christmas, then a bit longer. Now he wants her to buy a wardrobe for his clothes which he keeps in her bedroom! As SJ says;
"but that would make an intolerable situation even more permanent."
He is not planning to make this a temporary stay at all! He forced her, by manipulative tactics, to allow him to stay in the first place then he put his things all over her house! He won't even allow her to make a cup of tea in peace!
He will not talk about plans, or discuss anything that she wants to sort out.
He has threatened to take her to Court to demand back money he spent when they have been on holiday and he has paid for things! This is not a good man! A loving partner does not say that to their beloved! A loving partner does not expect a free ride, free accommodation, to be able to stay in another person's house and fill it, even the other person's private bedroom, with their things, and even fill that person's mother's garage! He is a grossly exploitative with an overwhelming attitude of entitlement and no awareness or concern for his Partner's feelings of distress and unhappiness he is causing.
I wish I could read something decent into him. I tried. But SJ's letter is a cry for help from a kind and caring person who has strong feelings of doing the right thing so is easily "guilt-tripped" into being made to do things against her will and against her better judgement. Even when she is trying to say she wants to help him for the sake of the long-standing relationship, she is overwhelmed by feeling "so stressed and unhappy". The relationship, imho only lasted before he moved in simply because he did not live with her and she had her haven of peace to which to return.
The relationship changed once he took over her house, treating it as if he owned it and thus revealed his true imperious nature.
It has been said before, we do not know how he actually treated his parents. People have quoted examples of the duplicitous behaviour demonstrated by those who, behind closed doors, were adamant bullies and cruel, but in the street and publicly were all sweetness and light. I have seen it too. I have serious doubts as to whether his behaviour in his late parents' home was any different to that which he is portraying here. People are usually consistent. (Psychology research has abundantly shown this).
Maybe, when he was divorced, he asked his parents if he could stay "just for a while until he finds his own place"? We do not know. We know he stayed about 20 years if he was there during their relationship and we can only surmise what kind of money he contributed to the housekeeping for being his parents' lodger.
He is kind and helpful when it suits his purpose, when he wants to build up his reputation in public and when he wants to make SJ think he is indispensable. Nobody is indispensable.
I really would like SJ to start taking the steps needed to make him move out. You gave her some excellent advice. On which note, may I say how I admire your advice? I have noticed several times that you speak with what seems to be experience and make concise suggestions, with reasons, as to what people might do. I think you are so helpful!
Back to this man! He needs to be looking for his permanent residence now. SJ is scared of the moment he comes up with the threat;
"if I 'throw him out' he'd never have anything to do with me or my mother again and that I'd be mad to 'look a gift horse in the mouth' and mum and I would be in a terrible position financially and otherwise, because of everything he does for us."
I would like to suggest she says something that neither agrees nor disagrees and most of all does not discuss the issue, such as;
"Yes, you said that before." When he has another try to upset her and make her talk about it (make her defend herself so he can knock her down verbally) she just repeats the "yes, you said that before." and keeps repeating it like a cracked record.
She will manage without his financial support or help in other ways. Plus she will have freedom! Freedom from blackmail and being forced to live a miserable and desperately unhappy life. She will regain her own life where she can go home and relax in her own bedroom, sit on her own sofa, or make a cup of tea in her own kitchen.
The money and other practicalities will get sorted out. They always do. Ask those of us who have been through it. Nobody has to depend upon an abusive man.
I do believe, the instances sited by SJ in her letter add up to the fact that his man is abusive.