I had no problems keeping my own name when I got married about 40 years ago (except for my own mother who only ever addressed me as Mrs His forename and surname afterwards but that’s a long, painful story)
My DH didn’t even question it- his mother kept her own name, and she was married in the early 1950s.
Our children have the surname that was closer to the beginning of the alphabet, on the grounds that research on the education system of the day strongly suggested that children with surnames at the end of the alphabet were disadvantaged.
We didn’t consider double barrelling, we’re not posh, besides the result would have had unacceptable connotations.
Why should a woman be expected to give up her name, which is a big part of her identity just because she gets married. We no longer consider her to be the “chattel” of her husband. If either party chooses to change their name so that the new unit has the same name it might make things easier for someone but really it’s entirely up to the individuals involved.
Backseat Driver, Former PM Tony Blair Reckons The Triple-Lock...


