undines
Gosh I would never post on here with a problem! So many judgemental replies! Every marriage is different. In the 'old days' the wife stayed at home and managed the house, the man went out to work, but as I see it that was a partnership. Which means resources are shared. If a wife is a homemaker why should she have no financial rights? Homemaking is an essential, but little respected role, and if that was the OP's role, agreed between the two of them, then of course she has 'rights' when it comes to money and most reasonable husbands would agree - what say you, David49? I'm not sure what the answer is but if I were in the OP's position I think I might become less nice to live with!
I think I posted this (more or less) earlier in the thread, and I do agree totally, but I think it has become a debate about a husband ‘ controlling’ finances!
As far as I can see, Debbi would like to do nice things WITH her husband, but he doesn’t share her enthusiasm, because he feels her suggestions are too expensive. I said earlier that maybe he would agree to putting a sum away every month to fund outings, perhaps starting with lunch, then moving on to weekends and short breaks.
I know that the Bodach would never have minded if we didn’t ever go on holiday, though he always enjoyed it when we did. I’m sure that, had I died first, he would have preferred to keep the money in the bank. I see that Debbis husband is, like the Bodach, an only child of well-off parents, so maybe it’s something to do with how they were brought up. It took me quite a while to ‘train’ him into being more relaxed about spending!