I am sure that Sbagran is right - it is unimaginable that this young man and his family did not give thanks where it was due- to the doctors, nurses, paramedics etc. But the thread is about whether his recovery was an "act of God" or the work of these good dedicated people who cared for him.
If one believes in a god as creator, then indeed it is appropriate to be glad that these good people were born with the potential to work hard to learn the skills to save this young man. But it begs the question - if the god is creator, then he/she also created this young man's heart defect - how does a believer respond to that conundrum?
This is not religion-bashing - I have enormous respect for others' beliefs (with a few exceptions where child mutilation is involved!), but a genuine attempt to understand how believers deal with these dilemmas/inconsistencies etc.
Maybe, like the archbishop of Canterbury, they will just say that they do not know, in which case we are all in the same boat - I do not know either!!
The concept of free will always seems like another cop-out to me - do we have the free will to choose that the AIDS virus should not exist, or that the laws of physics should make tsunamis impossible, or that children should not get cancer? We certainly have free will to choose how we behave; but we are not free to alter the facts of nature as we see them before us with all their beauties and agonies.
I am delighted that this young man has recovered and rejoice with his family, as I am sure we all do.
Reform UK’s Richard Tice allegedly failed to pay £100,000 in corporation tax
[ confused]
