Gransnet forums

Religion/spirituality

Should we follow France's lead and ban face coverings?

(168 Posts)
Aka Fri 04-Jul-14 09:38:12

Following the European Court of Human Rights upholding the French ban on wearing the burka in public, there is an interesting letter in today's Times from Taj Hargey, a prominent Imam, who says Britain should follow France's example. He says 'There is no Koranic mandate for facial masks; it is not culturally common for Pakistani women to conceal their faces; and no one, including woman, has an unqualified right to dress as one pleases in public.'

He goes on to say that Muslim women are banned from concealing the faces in Mecca

I think this issues was debated on GN a while ago, but we have new members and I was interested in the decision of the European Court and Dr Hargey's letter.

Tresco Fri 04-Jul-14 16:07:19

Sorry, that's what comes of only reading the last hour's worth of comments.

Lilygran Fri 04-Jul-14 16:12:05

There have been riots in France as a result of the ban. One veiled woman went to gaol for biting a police officer during a disturbance.

granjura Fri 04-Jul-14 16:28:24

This is a very difficult one for me. France does not only forbid full burka or face covering, but any head covering in school for girls, even a brighlty covered scarf- which I think is totally wrong. Some teenagers have stopped attending school due to this- how is it helpful?

I really feel uncomfortable when meeting women wearing a burka or full nicab- as I can't make eye contact, or smile to them- and therefore no chatting or any interaction as I am a very social and friendly person. To some exten I realise this is MY problem, not theirs though.

I think that as in the UK we allow, quite rightly imho, to wear traditional discreet clothing, and a headscarf- there is just no need to a full burka or nicab. Some girls actually wear this against the advice of their parents too- and some are of course forced to wear it. It is certainly NOT a requirement in the Koran, at all.

What I do feel VERY EXTREMELY UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THOUGH- is the attitude to foreigners and to Islam in general, clearly shown by many who make a lot of noise about it, for all the wrong reasons.

janerowena Fri 04-Jul-14 17:11:14

It is thought that quite a few extremists have managed to evade arrest by escaping the country wearing burkas.

NfkDumpling Fri 04-Jul-14 17:15:35

I don't think you should see it as 'your problem' Granjura. I think it's a natural thing in our culture to feel uncomfortable with covered faces. Unless it's blowing a blizzard, veils, masks, visors, balaclavas are suspicious. Why doesn't that person want to be recognised? It's a natural, historical Western culture aversion.

It's not just a religious thing. As a receptionist I had to steel myself to give friendly smiles when motor cycle couriers strode in through the door. But at least I could ask them to remove their helmets.

I agree though that forbidding wearing a headscarf is going a bit far. Our Queen always used to, very much the thing in the 60s. And some Christian sects wear head squares too. How are they enforcing this ban?

NfkDumpling Fri 04-Jul-14 17:16:27

(And what about nuns?)

janerowena Fri 04-Jul-14 17:21:22

That too, (as escape disguise) the IRA used that ploy.

NfkDumpling Fri 04-Jul-14 17:25:31

I don't know why, but dressing as a woman to escape seems sort of cowardly and unmanly! Although I think the Scarlet Pimpernel did!

janerowena Fri 04-Jul-14 17:31:17

I think the same!

Tegan Fri 04-Jul-14 17:43:52

..and Mr Toad....

NfkDumpling Fri 04-Jul-14 17:45:24

Wel, I never saw Mr Toad as being manly. A frog now, that would be different!

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 04-Jul-14 17:55:12

No, we should not ban the practice. Persuasion, yes. Banning - what right have we got to do that?

granjura Fri 04-Jul-14 18:36:41

nfkD- all girls turning up at school, however studious, polite, hard-working, etc- are automatically suspended until they agree to remove their scarf. Even if it is brightly coloured with a design, and leaving the face totally free.

At the last French exchange I organised, the French students came first. On the day of arrival, we were told one of the French students had not been able to come due to a family bereavement. We of course included our student in all the activities with the group- she was very disappointed and her family had made lots of preparation for the French student- but of course understood the circumstances.

Then after their return to France, we got an e-mail to say the French family would not be able to receive our student on the return leg, with again, family reasons given. We replied that as she was one of our best students, we expected them to find an alternative family, even a staff one- so that she could join us. We were told that would be very difficult. We wrote again, and again, asking what arrangements had been made- and the answers were always that no solution had been found, and 'unfortunately' she would not be able to come. I was in touch with the older girl who had been placed with our family (she had repeated several years and was older than the rest, and about the same age as our youngest at the time- so I agreed to host her instead of a member of staff as per normal)- as she had asked me to help her find a host family for her as an Au-Pair for the autumn. I told her what was happening- and she knew our lovely student well, as she had tagged along with us on a few occasions. Her mum rang back a couple of minutes later and offered to have her as well as me, to stay at theirs, so she would not be let down, and we were delighted. We e-mailed the FRench school the next morning to give them the good news- and the reply came a couple of hours later. You can't do that- they said. Why not- it's done.

And then the whole story came out- our student was the daughter of a local GP and wore a scarf- and therfore both the French family (no bereavement of course!) and the school thought she was not suitable for an exchange. The family were well integrated and fully aware of the the needs for adaptation to their food and routine during the girl's stay. The school said that if she came to school in France wearing a scarf, she would be turned away. I almost cancelled the whole exchange there and then- but then our families had already made huge efforts when hosting the French kids. I went to see our student's parents, and played the whole thing down- but said it was FRench law and therefore we had to adhere to it. I offered to cancel the whole exchange- but they asked for a couple of hours to consider. They came to visit me after school, and said that they had decided that their daughter would be exempt from wearing the scarf for the duration of the exchange, as she really wanted to go, and they didn't want the exchange to be cancelled for the others. It was such an eye-opening and tragic situation, and the family showed great understanding and open-ness.

Two opposite groups of French staff were adamant that she should not be able to come into school- the far right-wingers, who were openly racist- but more surprisingly all the liberal-left wingers.

NfkDumpling Fri 04-Jul-14 18:52:16

That is absolutely awful! Horrible people.

The covering the face thing I can understand but the headscarf is harmless, no different to a turban or cross - I assume these are banned too?

rosesarered Fri 04-Jul-14 19:19:21

No problem with headscarves. It's the other things. Agree with most posters on this. It's not religious, just cultural.Nobody should be faceless and muffled up.

Lilygran Fri 04-Jul-14 19:35:21

France is a secular state so demonstrations of religion aren't allowed. I don't know how they go on with bishops, priests, nuns.....

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 04-Jul-14 19:42:50

I don't see why, because a state is secular, the people aren't allowed to demonstrate their religion. There are many Catholics in France. I don't believe they are not allowed to wear a cross.

granjura Fri 04-Jul-14 19:51:32

Turbans are generally not an issue as there a very few Sikhs in France. The Jewish kippa used to be tolerated, not sure how it is now. I'm afraid that in France, the secular idea just about serves as an excuse for racism for too many. Crosses are ignored, and there are 1000s of cheap private catholic schools too. A huge difference between teaching religion, which I agree should be totally banned in secular countries (and in the UK too imho- religion is a private, personal and family matter)- and discriminating against religion (again, thinly veiled (pun intended) as secularism instead of anti-islamic racism.

jinglbellsfrocks Fri 04-Jul-14 19:54:27

Yes. I have suspicions about the French and racism.

thatbags Fri 04-Jul-14 20:40:05

People can and do practise their religion in France. Overt religious signs are not allowed in schools is all. I understood that it is all face-coverings except for protection that are banned so it's not a ban just on the ones some women wear/are forced to wear.

Not allowing girls to wear ordinary headscarves does seem excessive but I notice you mention bright colours only, jura. Does that mean that less brightly coloured headscarves would be allowed in schools so long as the person's face was visible?

thatbags Fri 04-Jul-14 20:43:05

Private schools are presumably not subject to exactly the same rules as public schools in France? Same as here. Do the headscarf rules only apply in publicly funded schools?

thatbags Fri 04-Jul-14 20:45:14

The ECHR ruling is about face coverings only, not head coverings (hats various). In a secular, democratic society, I think it is a perfectly reasonable ruling.

thatbags Fri 04-Jul-14 20:45:50

It is WEIRD to want to cover your face so that other people can't have a normal social relationship with you.

thatbags Fri 04-Jul-14 20:48:24

The rest of us have rights too, including the right to see the faces of our fellow citizens and that right, the European Court of Human Rights rightly says, transcends the supposed right to hide.

janerowena Fri 04-Jul-14 21:08:09

I had a couple of Italian muslim friends, he worked in the offices on the technical side of Eurostar. They bought a house in France of course - but the racism was so bad that they simply switched ends of the tunnel and bought one in Kent instead. She didn't even wear anything on her head at all, they were just different and spoke Arabic together. She wore jeans and trousers, but if she wanted to wear a skirt it would be a long one. I don't think France has ever liked anyone that looks remotely Arabic since the pieds noir were repatriated. They were suspected of being of mixed heritage, even if they weren't.