I tried reading this without getting bogged down with the scientific specifics of what he was saying, in order to allow myself to get a feel of the over-view I would hold.
I think I understand the general gist, and like what he said about the harmonic cycle having always existed. That made sense to me.
I particularly liked what he said here...........
"...Yes, but there is the need to study the results that I am finding well. A rational debate requires the willingness to understand what the other person would like to say and how he is making the arguments: understanding what are his findings and so on......."
A modest and open man of science, I think.