Gransnet forums

Science/nature/environment

Save seed biodiversity

(11 Posts)
Eloethan Wed 01-May-13 15:07:24

Bags I wondered about this too. Although most people like a good moan about the EU, I quite often find myself in agreement with some of the policies they've introduced.

I need to read the links and other stuff before forming an opinion.

I have, however, decided that Monsanto is a very dangerous organisation and becomes more so as each day passes.

Bags Wed 01-May-13 11:41:10

Thanks for the link, ga. This sentence jumped out at me: "One of the more troublesome aspects of this legislation are the ‘delegated acts’, effectively meaning many of the most important aspects of it will be decided later in committee, immune to democratic process."

Worth signing if that is true.

grannyactivist Wed 01-May-13 10:57:27

I have signed the petition. An interesting blog on the subject here: bifurcatedcarrots.eu/2013/04/important-eu-seed-law-vote-6-may/

Bags Wed 01-May-13 09:47:28

Here is a link to the actual EU draft. No, I haven't waded through all 98 pages of it, but the first couple of pages do not raise any alarms bells with me.

Aims such as traceability of plant material seem like a good idea. Environmental protection where possible seems like a good idea. And so on.

And as far as I can envisage, my digging up a plant in my garden, dividing it and handing some to a pal for her garden won't be a problem, unless we were talking about notifiable invasive weeds such as Japanese knotweed. I used to collect my own lettuce seed from plants I'd deliberately allowed to run to seed and re-sow. Can't see that being a problem either.

Bags Wed 01-May-13 08:52:53

Another page by those who oppose the new proposals. It seems the fear is that the EU directive, if adopted, will restrict seed diversity.

Bags Wed 01-May-13 08:41:24

Just had a look at the aims of EU rules about food plant propagation. Looks reasonable to me. It seems to be about quality standards and the identifiability of species and sub species.

Going to search specifically about seeds now.

Elegran Wed 01-May-13 08:22:46

There is an interesting fact on the webpage about a possible conflict of interest.

Bags Wed 01-May-13 08:12:11

Can anyone explain to me why this is being proposed. I know it's probably about money for seed merchants, but is the EU law-making body really so stupid that they haven't come up with some scientific 'reasons' for doing it?

I suppose I'd better go and investigate.

Right now, my feeling is that if this becomes law then the moral thing to do will be to break the law. I wonder if what my investigations uncover will convince me otherwise.

Notso Wed 01-May-13 08:06:10

There's a Twitter campaign about this ( @AcryliCloche ) and quite a few people/organisations in the horticulture industry are on board.

JessM Wed 01-May-13 07:31:52

Elegran I guess the democratic route is via our MEPs. Bit of a pain that they are multiple these days. But the good news is that on the wonderful site:
www.writetothem.com

You can email all your MEPs simultaneously with one email.

Elegran Wed 01-May-13 07:10:42

On 6 May the EU will discuss yet another directive. This is not another myth. This one will set up a restrictive list of approved seeds and varieties, and will make it illegal to sell, exchange or give away any seeds that are not on the list. Among other things it will outlaw Heritage seeds in the EU. It is interesting that someone at the heart of this proposal has a connection with an association for major seed companies.

More here - open-seeds.org/bad-seed-law/

On that page, we are recommended to email EU commissioners to comment on the proposal (their email adresses are given). I emailed 22 EU commissioners on 26 April and so far have had not a single reply or acknowledgment.

One of them ([email protected]) was returned as undeliverable. I think he must have taken his email off the hook.