Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Lengthy 'cut and paste' - acceptable or not?

(142 Posts)

GNHQ have commented on this thread. Read here.

jura2 Fri 17-Aug-18 12:36:17

It would be helpful for GN to make a decision on copy/cut/paste. GN should make a clear decision about whether they are allowed, and put a maximum length.

Personally I think it is much better to post a link- with perhaps the most saillant point/s 'cut and pasted' up to a maximum word length. The recent pages and pages are totally unacceptable imho, from either side or anywhere in between. Thank you.

Bridgeit Sat 18-Aug-18 17:19:35

That’s not a bad thing Jalima ?

Jalima1108 Sat 18-Aug-18 17:18:05

I am beginning to feel like a mushroom.

Bridgeit Sat 18-Aug-18 17:06:13

I beleive someone’s idea of a little light entertainment has backfired, if I am wrong then I will be asked to leave & will happily do so.

Bridgeit Sat 18-Aug-18 16:55:58

Lemongrove, i did not ask a cut & post to be checked, I queried a new poster & their chosen user name & the coincidence of it.
HQ must have had some concerns or I would have been told in no uncertain terms if it was otherwise.

Jalima1108 Sat 18-Aug-18 16:46:53

It's not always like this rubytut - stay and find out.

rubytut Sat 18-Aug-18 16:32:46

I do not understand why adults on a forum need reporting for anything. Why cant you ignore what you do not like, this is so petty "telling on people".I have been on GN for about a month and have decided it is not for me.

lemongrove Sat 18-Aug-18 16:25:00

Since HQ have spoken there is no point in fighting it, but if they read this thread, they will see our views on this new rule.

lemongrove Sat 18-Aug-18 16:23:05

No point as you say jura in waiting for an apology ( you must be joking!) You started this thread didn’t you?

lemongrove Sat 18-Aug-18 16:20:56

So, it’s a double whammy from Bridgeit asking HQ to check the cut and paste posts on a thread, and jura asking HQ to ‘clarify’ the cut and pastes i.e. are they allowed.

This has resulted in one poster leaving just as they had arrived, another poster thinking carefully about is this forum for them and most of us perplexed as to the rules, as
Various posters over the years of all polititical flavours have done this.
Very strange.

MawBroon Sat 18-Aug-18 16:05:02

Is that a —not very— subtle way of bringing it back to Brexit?gringrin
? ? ? Ducks behind sofa!

kittylester Sat 18-Aug-18 15:35:40

And what is it to do with Boris!

Bridgeit Sat 18-Aug-18 15:22:42

Is there an ongoing dispute? I don’t understand last couple of posts. ?

jura2 Sat 18-Aug-18 15:16:34

Not much point in hanging around for an apology. BoJo eat your heart out.

jura2 Sat 18-Aug-18 15:15:15

We are always told by GNHQ to give posters the benefit of the doubt

did you give it to me? And yes, it was entirely coincidence - but you still jumped me like a ton of bricks- you and friends- and somehow made GN's response my fault and responsibility. Did you not.

I'd say not a great day in the MB and co annals either, for sure. Over- out.

MawBroon Sat 18-Aug-18 15:01:00

What did happen then?
Other than Iamnotarobot perhaps selecting the most inappropriate name at the time (but who is to judge? Jingl came up its some corkers at regular intervals) and posting a lengthy cut and paste without any idea that this was frowned upon -and who has never done a cut n paste?- finds herself immediately under suspicion and at the blunt end of the unfriendliest message I have ever seen on GN.
Entirely by coincidence Jura requires GNHQ to rule for or against cut n pastes and suddenly the goalposts are changed without warning.
We are always told by GNHQ to give posters the benefit of the doubt and posts containing the “t” word or any suspicion thereof are deleted sharpish and yet GNHQ jump to some outlandish and unsubstantiated conclusion and the poor woman (rightly) decides that perhaps GN is not for her.
Beating oneself over the head with a wet kipper might indeed be a more pleasant way of passing the time.
Not a great day in the annals of GN was it?

jura2 Sat 18-Aug-18 14:46:03

Whereas I never had any private correspondance with GN, nor reported any post or anyone. Just simply asked for clarification - and look what happened.

Bridgeit Sat 18-Aug-18 14:24:57

Ahh,thanks so much for posting, janeainsworth,

janeainsworth Sat 18-Aug-18 14:14:45

Bridgeit you weren’t the only one to have those thoughts, or mention it to HQ.

Bridgeit Sat 18-Aug-18 14:04:15

Apologies to HQ if this is not acceptable but I think it needed to be said.

Bridgeit Sat 18-Aug-18 14:02:12

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Jalima1108 Sat 18-Aug-18 11:13:02

Goodness me, jura, I must have missed the accusations and the bile covered witch-hunt.

Surely GNHQ will delete such personal attacks, let's hope so.

Jalima1108 Sat 18-Aug-18 10:42:42

Just make sure not to leave a gap which I have done on more than one occasion

^ like this ^!

jura2 Sat 18-Aug-18 10:40:32

But will just try and do as before and keep away. The accusations made here since I simply asked GN for clarification have been mind-boggling- and truly resembling a bile covered witch-hunt. How can I be responsible for just asking for clarification? It says an awful lot more about certain posters than about me, for sure. Sad indeed.

jura2 Sat 18-Aug-18 10:37:10

^ah, thanks, it works.^

jura2 Sat 18-Aug-18 10:36:40

trying

as said, my keyboard does not have square brackets