Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Lengthy 'cut and paste' - acceptable or not?

(141 Posts)

GNHQ have commented on this thread. Read here.

janeainsworth Fri 17-Aug-18 14:42:37

Thanks from me too Lara.

jura2 Fri 17-Aug-18 14:11:00

Thank you Lara @ GN, for clarification.

merlotgran Fri 17-Aug-18 13:55:54

I'm another one who just scrolls past them. Life's too short to read a load of lengthy waffle. Links are far better - I tend to ignore them as well. grin

Chewbacca Fri 17-Aug-18 13:55:53

I just lose interest in long and wordy cut and paste posts and skim over them; I feel like I'm being word bombed. Far better to summarise the main points and post a link so that people can read further if they wish.

M0nica Fri 17-Aug-18 13:55:11

I too do not read long cut and pastes. Give a link and a brief summary of the salient points.

I find it equally irritating when there are links, sometimes several and no indication of what they are about.

Fennel Fri 17-Aug-18 13:52:26

Winterwhite - "Gives the impression of trying to blank out everyone else."
I agree. It has been annoying me, and others, for ages. Glad GNHQ have done something about it.
And thanks Jura for starting the thread.

LaraGransnet (GNHQ) Fri 17-Aug-18 13:46:29

Hello, you'll see we've deleted the 'long cut and paste jobs' so please report any if you see them. On the whole if you do refer to another article or website please put the extract in quotes and attribute where you are getting it from. But most importantly, as many of you have said, this is a conversation so if you're going to refer to another source, it's better to make it part of the conversation and put it into context.

winterwhite Fri 17-Aug-18 13:21:36

Another who dislikes this trend. Gives the impression of trying to blank out everyone else.
And I would prefer brief information on the source quoted in words not just an url.
Thank you for initiating this Jura.

mostlyharmless Fri 17-Aug-18 13:14:24

Some people don’t choose to read links or can’t access them.
So I think it’s a good idea to summarise your point in a paragraph or two, then provide a link if appropriate, so people can choose to read further if they are interested.

Long cut’n’pastes makes the discussion very tedious.

Welshwife Fri 17-Aug-18 13:06:27

I never read long cut and paste either - just find it a nuisance scrolling past them. Like Scribbles I often open links and read them.

Jane10 Fri 17-Aug-18 12:59:49

Yup. If there's a long cut and paste I tend to just move on.

Scribbles Fri 17-Aug-18 12:52:55

I tend not to read great screeds of cut & pasted text. It feels like homework whereas a link and a comment from the OP that this is praiseworthy/deplorable/cruel and what do others think? will probably spark my interest and i'll follow it up.

mcem Fri 17-Aug-18 12:50:06

Links yes. Long cut n paste posts no!

janeainsworth Fri 17-Aug-18 12:43:27

Especially when the person doing the copying & pasting gives no indication of their own thoughts about the subject in hand.

janeainsworth Fri 17-Aug-18 12:42:22

I agree jura
I’m very happy to read other people’s opinions and sincerely held beliefs, but when long screeds are copied and pasted, it does feel as though we are being force-fed political propaganda.

jura2 Fri 17-Aug-18 12:36:17

It would be helpful for GN to make a decision on copy/cut/paste. GN should make a clear decision about whether they are allowed, and put a maximum length.

Personally I think it is much better to post a link- with perhaps the most saillant point/s 'cut and pasted' up to a maximum word length. The recent pages and pages are totally unacceptable imho, from either side or anywhere in between. Thank you.