Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Starting a profile page

(71 Posts)

GNHQ have commented on this thread. Read here.

BradfordLass72 Fri 18-Jan-19 06:31:49

My welcome email aid I could have my own personal page and upload photos for people to see.. I know how to upload photos when I make a comment on the Forum but have been unable to find anything, even in Setting where I could start a profile page.
Any advice and links would be welcome. Thanks thanks

Jonna Mon 18-Feb-19 14:10:59

If you click on FAQs you'll find this information:

Personalising Gransnet
How do I set up a personal profile page?
Go to your My Gransnet page and log in. Select "Edit your public profile" and then fill in your details. You can then choose using the drop down menu whether to make your profile visible to all Gransnetters or not.
How do I upload photos to my personal profile page?
Go to your My Gransnet page and log in. Select "Photos". You can then create a photo gallery by selecting digital photos on your computer and uploading them. There are more detailed instructions on the upload page.

Perhaps an amendment to FAQs would be in place?

MissAdventure Tue 22-Jan-19 14:57:54

Thank you.
Now if I could just stop being bombarded with Roman blinds whizzing across my screen, all would be well!

Cherrytree59 Tue 22-Jan-19 14:41:39

Glad HQ showed some sense MissA

Just need HQ to show same senses with the ridiculous video ads that are everywhere on GN at the moment. Grr!

ffinnochio Tue 22-Jan-19 14:19:02

Good to hear, MissA.

Cherrytree59 Tue 22-Jan-19 13:27:09

I have asked this several times with no answer from HQ '
why can GN not have 30 day or 90 day thread the same as MN where posts are removed after that time'?
Had MissAdventure posted on a 30 day thread she would know that even though HQ had refused to remove the thread after 30 days it would to quote MNHQ go pouf and be no more.

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 13:25:14

I think that Gransnetters realise that their posts can be seen by anyone, but they are not aware that they can be discussed elsewhere with people sharing and commenting in places where OP never sees the replies.
I think that if you ran a poll asking Gransnetters if they were on social media that many would say that they don’t touch it- not realising that Gransnet is social media where Gransnet hold all the controls and the poster has none, except to keep their posts very bland.
Perhaps at the very least the starter of the thread should be asked if they mind being linked elsewhere - or have a clear warning before starting a thread of - this may be shared on Twitter or Facebook. Or they could email the OP and tell them that they have 67 replies on Facebook.

Glad they had a change of heart MissAdventure.

MissAdventure Tue 22-Jan-19 13:20:03

It was posted on Twitter though, albeit in error.
Again, my fault, but it won't be happening again.

RachellaGransnet (GNHQ) Tue 22-Jan-19 13:02:36

We love our gransnetters. So many of our lovely members come together to offer moral support, advice and a bit of fun.

It's always worth bearing in mind, though, that Gransnet is a public site and all posts can be seen by anyone, regardless of whether they are on social media or not.

So, with this in mind, it's generally a good idea to avoid any kind of identifying detail, especially when talking about personal issues. We have a large membership so when you're posting about sensitive issues take a minute to think: Will I be upset if what I have written is read by a large audience?

MissAdventure Tue 22-Jan-19 12:03:00

The Twitter thread has now been deleted by gransnet. smile

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 10:28:35

I have just - for the first time- found and read the Gransnet privacy policy. I can’t see anywhere that gives me privacy choices.
On Twitter I have my name, photograph and interests, but yet have far more control. If I wanted I could protect my tweets so that only followers could read them and I could vet those followers.

GrannyGravy13 Tue 22-Jan-19 10:20:33

I found out about GN through twitter, I read the threads over several months before I joined.

GNHQ could it not be possible to have a "safe" place so that posters with nowhere/no one to turn to could post secure in the knowledge that it will not be used elsewhere.

For some gransnetters this foru is their only form of contact with the outside world, it would be such a shame if they felt unable to reach out in their times of need!!!

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 09:58:22

No. They are advertising - the purpose of using other social media is to get more people on the Gransnet site. They choose only a few threads each day- ones they think will be sufficiently interesting for people to come over and join in.
The problem being that people can read them, share and comment without doing it on Gransnet. Grandmother age people just having a general chit chat about nothing in particular is not something they think will get more traffic on the site. I never go on Soop’s kitchen - apart from once to see what it was- it is obvious that there are people on there who know each other and have a back history- even if only online.

ninathenana Tue 22-Jan-19 09:54:26

It's not so much a two tier system. More a case of, what will grab FB and Twitter's attention. Soop's kitchen is lovely but too bland to be shared elsewhere.

ffinnochio Tue 22-Jan-19 09:05:10

Ah, yes .... definitely be careful on ALL threads.

ffinnochio Tue 22-Jan-19 09:00:50

Yes, I understand that Blencathra. So are you saying that GNHQ has a two tier rule system which ‘protects’ certain threads from further exposure?

I’d certainly like to have that made clear by GNHQ if that is indeed the case.

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 08:56:54

In all my years on Twitter the general chat threads have never been linked ( to my knowledge) However best to be careful on all- just in case.
Mumsnet are the same. They share. I once started a thread on Mumsnet that I wanted removed - I got the ‘won’t because useful replies’ answer.

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 08:53:14

The answer is simple - if Gransnet want a useful and helpful Forum, where people feel free to post personal experiences, they need to keep it exclusive to Gransnet. They have plenty of articles they can share. If they don’t the forum ceases to be useful when people stick to the bland.
In actual fact what happens is that this will all disappear and new posters will be very candid because they have no idea that their problem is shared.

ffinnochio Tue 22-Jan-19 08:50:49

I think there are a few assumptions there, Blencathra, unless you definitively know that’s the case. I am very wary in all threads, chat or not.

Am astonished MissAdventure that your request to remove the thread you started was denied by*GNHQ*!

#clickbait

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 08:47:02

Exactly Riverwalk. It also means that once you start something and get replies you can’t stop it - the answer always being the one MissAdventure was given.

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 08:43:58

My last 2 posts were in reply to ffinnochio

Riverwalk Tue 22-Jan-19 08:43:52

The lack of an edit button is part of the same problem - people would be able to remove or change their post if they found it shared elsewhere.

And that's the very reason why GN doesn't have an edit button - the threads would make no sense if posters could change or remove what they'd written.

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 08:42:14

1964 thread is quite likely to make a share.

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 08:40:35

They are just general chat. They like a definite title. All they could put is ‘ this is how people chat on Gransnet’ and who would be interested in that? I can more or less see new threads and work out which will be linked.

Blencathra Tue 22-Jan-19 08:38:23

Definitely don’t go MissAdventure - I shall feel dreadful - I just picked you at random as an example. I will stick to naming the thread and not the poster.
The lack of an edit button is part of the same problem - people would be able to remove or change their post if they found it shared elsewhere.
A huge problem is that we have no controls on Gransnet at least Facebook and Twitter have privacy controls.

ffinnochio Tue 22-Jan-19 08:36:32

Apologies for misspelling Blencathra